Tuesday, October 30, 2007

The dual-loyalty/Jew-control meme

The dual-loyalty/Jew-control meme is becoming dangerous enough that CAMERA has actually had to take responsibility for the problem in order to deflect attention from those really responsible.

On the same general topic of the new resistance movement characterized by a recognition of the massive dual loyalty problem (under President Rudary, this will be the single most important problem facing America, and failure to address it will certainly lead to an American tragedy), see ‘The Signs of Resistance to Jewish Supremacism’ (but I note that Conrad Black would be amused to find that he is Jewish;  I’ve been wondering recently whether the Mossad sent their Agent Amiel to seduce him and thus take control of his editorial positions, an operation which eventually destroyed Black).

Sarko the Sayanim

Sarko secretly works for the Mossad, and the French government takes an otherwise inexplicable position on Iranian nuclear program, contradicting the experts at the IAEA.  Coincidence?  Sarko’s right-wing politics comes directly out of the same Zionist roots, the secret campaign to force all politics to the right in order to improve the position of the Israeli empire builders.  This campaign has been a tremendous success.  One would hope that the French left – which, unlike the American left, actually exists (!) – would be able to use the information that Sarko is a foreign agent with a secret anti-French program to parry his attempts to destroy the French social system.

Lantos the diplomat

Holocaust-survivor Tom Lantos (you never see him referred to without ‘Holocaust-survivor’ in front of his name, leading me to think that ‘Holocaust-survivor’ is his real first name, but his friends call him ‘Tom’) has a diplomatic meeting with the Dutch (via Bad Attitudes):

Dutch lawmakers who visited the Guantanamo Bay military prison this week said they were offended by a testy exchange in Washington with a senior congressional Democrat.

The lawmakers said that Tom Lantos, chairman of the House of Representatives' Foreign Affairs Committee, told them that ‘Europe was not as outraged by Auschwitz as by Guantanamo Bay.”


“’You have to help us, because if it was not for us you would now be a province of Nazi Germany,’ Lantos said, according to the Dutch lawmakers.

‘The comments killed the debate,’ said Harry van Bommel, a member of the Socialist Party. ‘It was insulting and counterproductive.’”

From the Lantos point of view, WWIII, Bibi’s ‘War on Terror’ – the war to allow Israel to continue to build an Empire by giving the Americans some reason to continue to take a Likudnik stance – is the precursor to the war Podhoretz is working on, WWIV – the war to build the Israeli Empire –  and the successor to WWII – the war to save the Jews from the Holocaust – a war which was only fought to the extent of saving the Dutch because the gentiles are all anti-Semites.  The reason that Lantos and his fellow dual loyalists can get away with this crap is that his insanity is so profound we simply cannot understand it.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Royal homosex/cocaine/blackmail scandal

There’s a Royal homosex/cocaine/blackmail scandal going on in Britain, and the British press, as per usual, have sealed up the name of the guilty Royal.  Speculation, and a bit of bonus extra conspiracy theory, here.  It would make sense that the victim of the blackmail must have been someone who couldn’t be blackmailed as he didn’t care what was revealed, which would explain police involvement rather than a pay-off.

Proof of Jew-control

The latest from the Jew-controlled American media is that satellite pictures show the Syrians cleaning up the concrete building illegally bombed by the Zionazis, this proving that the Syrians are trying to hide something.  This is just silly.  It remains the case that it is only from the Syrians that we have heard about this incident.  If the Syrians had something to hide, don’t you think that they would have cleaned up before they announced it to the world?  Of course, the Syrians have heard of satellites, and the building has been around for years.  If they were worried about what their factory looked like, they would have buried it underground.  The Syrians are cleaning up the illegally-inflicted damage because they want to rebuild, or because the illegally-dropped bombs make the site dangerous.  The clean-up = nuclear program reasoning is completely circular, and only works if you assume that they had something to clean up.

Anybody who has any trouble about the issue that the American media is Jew-controlled has only to look at the coverage of the attack on Syria to see conclusive proof.  The lies about Syria aren’t the work of the American Establishment, which immediately after the attack was begging Syria to join Middle East peace talks, hardly the position they would have taken if Syria had been caught red-handed with an illegal nuclear program.  The total credulity in the entire American media to what is obviously a Zionazi propaganda program – and not a very good one – has only one possible explanation.

Pseudoscience and the master race

The latest racialist nonsense, that mankind will evolve into a tall and beautiful uber-race, and a second, shorter and uglier, troll-like unter-race, the kind of theory that fits the Weltgeist of people like Watson and those who enjoy the ‘Bell Curve’ pseudoscience (btw, isn’t it curious that these theories are developed or adopted by men who luckily find themselves in the superior group?; the conspiracy angle is the role played by the Pioneer Fund in almost all of this ‘research’; given his sordid intellectual history in so many areas, why do people still give any credibility to Andrew Sullivan on any subject?), was funded by a men’s TV channel, the viewers of which would (naturally) feel themselves to be in the master race while actually being prime suspects as the ancestors of the troll people.  I’ll be interested in seeing the scientific research funded by the Playboy Channel.  A warning to people who believe in pseudoscience:  you’re not in the superior group!

I hope he jumps into the Charles

Norman Finkelstein reports on the research of Shankar Ramamoorthy which proves, yet again, that Alan Dershowitz is stingy with the truth.  I found this via The Heathlander, which also covers the latest semi-secret attack by Dershowitz on Finkelstein’s freedom of expression, this time at the Oxford Union (for more on the intrigue, see here).  The Dershowitz attacks on Finkelstein, now spanning the globe, are starting to have a distinct Les Miserables feel about them.

Friday, October 26, 2007

I'm changing the t-shirt slogan

The shit is really going to hit the fan when the Jew-controlled media is no longer able to block the stunningly obvious fact – Miles is on the way, but is still having trouble digesting it! – that Iraqi oil is going to be controlled by Iran, and is going to be sold to China.  So the war couldn’t have been about oil . . . and as oil is the major commodity, it couldn’t have been about ‘imperial reach’ . . . so that leaves . . . a war for Israel!  Oh oh! 

The funny thing about the ‘vassal’ government in Iraq is that it doesn’t seem to realize that it is a vassal government.  In fact, a real vassal state like Canada can only dream of having the autonomy that Iraq is showing.  Iraq doesn’t like the oil plans prepared by the Americans, so it shreds them.  Iraq and Turkey sanely meet to deal with the challenge posed by the Zionist trick to break up Iraq (and Turkey) by using a Turkish attack against the Kurds (there is a big advantage to knowing what is really going on when you obtain your info from other than the Jew-controlled media!).  Iraq is tired of murderous Blackwater, so the Americans will set Blackwater up with a nice gig policing the Mexican border.  If you thought it was fascist for the U. S. to use a private psycho-paramilitary in Iraq, wait to you see how fascist it will be for the United States to employ a private psycho police force within its own borders.  Talk about ‘blowback’!

I’m changing the t-shirt slogan to: ‘My President is Spending Trillions (and Trillions) on a War for the Jews but all I got was this Lousy T-Shirt and a Domestic Fascist Psycho Police Force’.


Duck and cover

Remember all the fun Americans had at the expense of Tom Ridge when he recommended using plastic and duct (or duck) tape as a defense against terrorism?  At least Home Depot was grateful.  The magic of duck and cover has reached Israel:

“Recommendations include stocking up on canned food, water, radios, batteries, and plastic sheets and tape to cover windows and doors in case of an attack involving chemical weapons . . . ”

The Israeli strategists really are concerned about the effect on civilians of a rocket attack in retaliation for the next illegal Israeli attack on one of its peaceful non-threatening neighbors.  This is obviously part of a propaganda desensitizing campaign being waged against the people of Israel, who are supposed to back up the next attack, safe and secure behind their impregnable fortress of duck tape and plastic sheeting. 

Rockets remain key to understanding what is going on in the Middle East.  Rockets protected Syria from the certain attack this past summer, and I remain convinced that the reason for the cover-up of the September attack on Syria is that it was a failed test of Russian/Syrian rocket emplacements.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Sabbatean conspiracy theory

There’s a conspiracy theory that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually a Jewish revolution against the Russians.  The parallel conspiracy theory for Turkey is that the ‘Young Turks’ were actually crypto-Jews (which explains why Ataturk was so vehemently against the symbols of Islam).  The theory extends to state that the Armenian genocide was actually a Jewish genocide against the Armenians, based on a traditional hatred of the Armenians.  If all this is true, why then does the modern Turkish state, particularly now with a government of Muslims, not acknowledge the fact of the Armenian genocide, and move on.  More particularly, I might expect to see Turkish writers expound on the conspiracy (although they would still have to be careful, as impugning the Young Turks is still considered to be treason).

Judeo-Fascist Awareness Week

The Zionist technique since the Lavon affair is to do something terrible, and then attempt to blame it on your enemies.  The key is to set one side against the other, wait for the destruction, and sneak up through the middle (the current example is here, where Israeli agents have provoked the Turks by using the U. S. Senate, while manipulating the Kurds into attacking Turkey).  This works well until people get hip to it, at which point it starts to backfire.  “Islamo-Fascist Awareness Week”, such as it is, seeking to pit Americans versus Muslims, is so outrageous that it has in fact emphasized to students that the real fascists are the people making the presentations and stirring up the hate.  The Zionazis have in fact created “Judeo-Fascist Awareness Week”, and all decent people owe Horowitz and his colleagues our thanks.

Everybody does it

Its not just the extreme right that uses the standard intelligence agency techniques of deception.  The nominal ‘left’ also enjoys it.  Note the Raw Story headline:  ‘CBS confirms 2006 Raw Story scoop: Plame's job was to keep nukes from Iran’. Of course, the stark truth is that CBS was plugging its show in which CIA agent Plame confirmed the CIA leak which was the original Raw Story ‘scoop’.  Shame!

As I’ve pointed out numerous times, Plame’s status as an outed agent, outed long before Armitage and Novak came along, makes all stories of her WMD-busting heroics just more tall tales from the professional liars at the CIA.

Note the intro to the original ‘scoop’:

“According to current and former intelligence officials . . . ”

who were, needless to day, “speaking under strict confidentiality”.

Pure Judy Miller: an intelligence agency with an agenda spreads its agenda with the help of an entirely credulous ‘journalist’ who shares the agenda, and doesn’t mind relying on uncorroborated anonymous sources with an obvious bias to do so.  Shame!

The semi-secret air wars

The semi-secret air wars (‘semi-secret’ because the information is released and is even reported on, but no American mentions it as a possible moral issue):

“The U.S. military has increased airstrikes in Iraq four-fold this year, reflecting a steep escalation in combat operations aimed at al-Qaeda and other militants.

Coalition forces launched 1,140 airstrikes in the first nine months of this year compared with 229 in all of last year, according to military statistics.

Airstrikes are up in Afghanistan, too. Coalition planes have made 2,764 bombing runs this year, up from 1,770 last year. The figures don't include strikes by helicopter gunships. 

The increasing use of air power also stems from improved accuracy and smaller munitions that allow commanders to launch airstrikes against insurgents who travel in small groups and sometimes hide among civilians.”

Whoever they claim they are trying to hit, it is civilians who are the actual targets (that last paragraph is unintentionally gruesome).  Air Force Maj. Gen. Allen Peck said:  “We are using air power in lieu of putting extensive forces on the ground.”  Exactly right, as they lack the manpower to do the job properly, and they don’t want the American casualty rates to go up.  The real political benefit is that the civilian casualties are increasing hatred of the Americans, the deep point of the exercise, a goal which fortunately, for the Zionists, matches the short-term goals of the Pentagon.

Recognizing the technique

Philip Giraldi, ‘ex’-CIA and therefore not to be trusted, is nevertheless quite good on the technique which we have seen in spades surrounding the Israeli attack on Syria:

“In the intelligence community, a disinformation operation is a calculated attempt to convince an audience that falsehoods about an adversary are true, either to discredit him or, in an extreme case, to justify military action. When such a campaign is properly conducted, information is leaked to numerous outlets over a period of time, creating the impression of a media consensus that the story is true, as each new report validates earlier ones.”

The classic recent example of this is the story about Iraq’s WMD, leaked to various intelligence agencies which then ‘confirmed the story by repeating it.  In the United States, the method is employed by having the same Israeli sources give the same story to different news sources, sometimes using their American employees for additional credibility, with each news source then backing up the same original lies.  All reporters who participate in this crap should be subject to embarrassment.

I note that we still have no official Israeli admission about this, only Bibi’s boasting of how he was ‘in the loop’ on the decision making, a boast for which he was criticized in Israel.  In other words, the only reason we know about this incident is because the Syrians so vociferously complained about it.  Do you think the Syrians would have made a major issue about it if they really had something to hide, particularly something as damaging as a secret nuclear bomb program?

As Giraldi emphasizes, the Israeli pointman on this issue in the United States is none other than John Bolton, a fact which in itself should completely wreck the credibility of the Israeli lies.

What makes me so mad about this is how easily the American media has fallen in line again, after all the supposed soul-searching over being tricked over Iraq’s WMD.  Hopeless idiots, or, as I suspect, complicit liars!


Wednesday, October 24, 2007

The Turks know

I recently pointed out the stunningly obvious fact – so obvious, in fact, you won’t see it mentioned anywhere else – that it wasn’t the ‘powerful Armenian lobby’ motivating the bizarre decision by Tom Lantos to bring up the Armenian genocide at this particularly delicate time.  The Turks know exactly what is going on.  From the JTA:

“ When a U.S. congressional committee approved a resolution recognizing the World War I-era massacre of Armenians by the Ottoman Empire as genocide, Turkey’s reaction was swift and harsh: Blame the Jews.

In an interview with the liberal Islamic Zaman newspaper on the eve of the resolution’s approval Oct. 10 by the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Turkish Foreign Minister Ali Babacan said he told American Jewish leaders that a genocide bill would strengthen the public perception in Turkey that ‘Armenian and Jewish lobbies unite forces against Turks.’

Babacan added, ‘We have told them that we cannot explain it to the public in Turkey if a road accident happens. We have told them that we cannot keep the Jewish people out of this.’”


“An online survey by Zaman’s English-language edition asking why Turks believed the bill succeeded showed at one point that 22 percent of respondents had chosen ‘Jews’ having legitimized the genocide claims’ – second only to ‘Turkey’s negligence.’”

Do you think it is a coincidence that Israel has been training the Kurds and that the Kurds suddenly took the opportunity of  this provocation by Israeli agent Lantos to mount a big attack against the Turks in Turkey?  The Kurds, egged on by the Israelis, want the Turks to attack Iraqi Kurdistan, as they see it as the only way to eventually lead to the breakup of Iraq and the creation of Greater Kurdistan.  Obviously, this also suits the Israelis.  The Turks are completely aware of the trickery, which is why they are attempting to forge an alliance with the Iraqi leaders to find a sane way around this. 

This is a typical Zionist conspiracy, utterly unconcerned with the devastation it will cause as long as there is the tiniest prospect of advancement for the cause of Jewish power.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Mary Louise Ward

There is an interesting posting (and possible thread to come) at the Zodiackiller.com message board on the locked-room murder of Mary Louise Ward in San Francisco in 1969.  She died in a house in a room with a door locked from the inside.  There had been a fire in the room, but she died, of an undetermined cause, before the fire started.  It was guessed that the fire had somehow been caused by a long-smoldering cigarette that had burst into flames after Ward’s death, despite the fact that there was no evidence of cigarettes or cigarette packaging in the room, and the victim abhorred smoking.  This is like something out of Agatha Christie.

Mary Louise Ward had been the secretary of Pat Montandon, and in fact died in Montandon’s house while Montandon was living elsewhere.  Pat Montandon was, amongst other things, a broadcaster, and cohosted a radio show with Marco Spinelli.  She was also briefly married to Melvin Belli.  Marco Spinelli was the ‘Count Marco’ who was the subject of a famous letter (the ‘Red Phantom’ letter), possibly by the Zodiac (or possibly by someone who had guessed who Zodiac was and wanted to direct the police in a particular direction), and Belli was himself the recipient of a famous – and undoubtedly genuine due to the included piece of victim Paul Stine’s bloody shirt – Zodiac letter.  The investigator of the Ward murder was Dave Toschi, who was the most prominent, and notorious, of the San Francisco Zodiac police investigators (Toschi has been accused, and officially cleared, of forging the disputed April 24th 1978 letter, which refers to yet another prominent local, Herb Caen).

All of these people were San Francisco ‘characters’, and conceivably moved in the same circles.  One has to wonder if Zodiac was in the same circles, and whether the many jokes and quips in the Zodiac letters were references to the wit and wisdom of the company he kept.  In fact, the letters might constitute a kind of confession that only somebody who moved in the same crowd might recognize (and the inauthentic letters may be hints from someone familiar with that crowd who has guessed who the Zodiac might be).  Could Mary Louise Ward have been one of his victims?  Is there still somebody out there from that same milieu who might be able to put the pieces together?


Hypocrisy, thy name is Horowitz

David Horowitz, the guy behind the hate crime known as ‘Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week’, attempts to answer some rather good questions on Islamonline.net.  Bizarrely, he portrays himself as some kind of feminist:

“. . . the main theme of our Week is to protest the oppression of Muslim women, including the 130 million Muslim girls who have their genitals sliced off without anesthetic in order to deprive them of sexual pleasure. Why are you defending mutilators of Muslim girls?”

So what seems like a clear case of hate mongering in aid of Israeli colonialism is really just an expression of Horowitz’ deep concern for women’s rights.  If that is so, shouldn’t he be broadening the scope of his campaign, and changing its name, to cover the increasing campaign of oppression of women by Ultra-Orthodox Jews in Israel?  Perhaps he could call it ‘Judeo-Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week’.

There is some indication that Condi Rice, affected by seeing the ‘Old South’ treatment the Palestinians receive from the Israelis, might want to be the Martin Luther King of the Palestinians.  If she stands up for the rights of Israeli women, maybe she could be the Rosa Parks of Israel as well.

Kelly disinformation

Be careful of a clever disinformation campaign being created around the murder of David Kelly.  From The Independent, on Norman Baker’s recent revelations:

“The MP alleges that opponents of Saddam Hussein feared Dr Kelly would ‘discredit’ them by revealing ‘misinformation’ they had planted to bolster the case for British and American intervention in Iraq.”

From the Scotsman:

“WEAPONS scientist Dr David Kelly was assassinated to stop him making further comments about Saddam's nuclear arsenal, according to new claims.

In a book about Kelly's death, Liberal Democrat Norman Baker says the assassins may have been anti-Saddam Iraqis and suggests their crime was covered up by the British establishment.

He says the British security services found out about the plot but were too late to stop it.”

This makes no sense, as Kelly was murdered after the American attack on Iraq.  Iraqi opponents of Saddam had no reason to fear discrediting, as they were not the ones identified with the lying campaign of the British and American governments (and why would they care about discrediting anyway, especially after they got their war?).  The only people who would be directly affected by anything that Kelly might have said would be the parties who crafted the lies used to justify the attack, those two governments.  That’s where the motive for murder lies, and that’s where we should be looking for suspects.  The idea that British security services couldn’t stop the murder in time seems to be a hint of who is behind the latest disinformation cover-up, the kind of over-egging that spreaders of disinformation often seem to be incapable of avoiding.  Baker’s secret informant may be an attempt to undermine his investigation.

Kelly seemed to share his deepest thoughts with Judy Miller.  You have to wonder whether those thoughts were transmitted by Miller to somebody in the Bush Administration who decided it would be wise to neutralize a potential embarrassment.

Saturday, October 20, 2007


The Israelis think that everything they do is divinely ordained, which means they are weak when it comes to plans that fail.  Since failure is impossible, why plan for it?  In fact, planning for failure is almost blasphemy.  Thus their Plan B for their illegal attack on Lebanon was no more than having the Americans come in to help, and when the Americans failed to do so, the Israelis were left with a disaster.  Whatever they were recently up to in Syria didn’t have the desired result, and they had to leave in such a hurry that they had to drop a fuel tank on Turkey, a faux pas which resulted in an embarrassing complaint from the Turks.  Not anticipating failure, and unable to admit to it, they were obviously unprepared with the usual propaganda lies to explain what was going on, and have been scrambling to backfill every since.  Hence, the latest, from “a senior U.S. official”, the current Jew-controlled press code words for one of the Israeli agents who works in the Bush Administration:

“Israeli officials believed that a target their forces bombed inside Syria last month was a nuclear facility, because they had detailed photographs taken by a possible spy inside the complex, ABC News has learned.”

A possible spy?  Do they mean that anyone taking pictures of a Syrian/North Korean nuclear facility in the middle of nowhere might be anything other than a spy?  The Israeli agent also has to explain away the complete lack of radiation produced by the supposed attack:

“There was also a secondary structure and a pump station, with trucks around it. But there was no fissionable material found because the facility was not yet operating.”

The Israeli agent told ABC News, "It was unmistakable what it was going to be. There is no doubt in my mind."  Basically, what they are describing is a concrete building in the desert, which has suddenly blossomed into a full-fledged Syrian/North Korean WMD factory.  Backfilling equals bullshit.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Mistranslation follies

The translator that caused the ruckus in mistranslating the Syrian ambassador’s words to include the word ‘nuclear’, which wasn’t there, is being disciplined (emphasis in red):

“The incident started Tuesday night with a U.N. press summary in English of the disarmament committee's proceedings that paraphrased the Syrian representative as saying, ‘Israel was the fourth largest exporter of weapons of mass destruction and a violator of other nations' airspace, and it had taken action against nuclear facilities, including the 6 July attack in Syria.’

The Syrian representative spoke in Arabic, but Haq said Thursday the problem was not the translation from Arabic. An interpreter who worked from Arabic into French was fairly accurate, he said.

The problem occurred when interpreter translated the statement into English from French, Haq said.

‘Action will be taken against that freelance interpreter to the fullest extent of the U.N. rules and regulations,’ Haq said, refusing to comment further on what that action might be.”

Gee, I hope they don’t make him give the sheqels back.  As you might expect, Elliot Abrams is up to his fangs in this one.



Greenwashing refers to the cloak used by organizations that advertise themselves as environmentally friendly while acting in the opposite way.  It includes setting up a phony movement or advocacy group to make it appear that ordinary people support the corporate agenda.  The Israelis have taken it one step further, and set up a phony ‘peace movement’, replete with dual Israeli-Palestinian ‘peace’ concerts.  The Palestinians weren’t fooled and the trick failed.  See the links at Yayacanada.

All the lies that fit

The New York Times, still dedicated to the relentless promotion of Zionist lies exemplified by their star writer Judy Miller, continues the tradition (emphasis in red; I’m shocked that Michael Gordon didn’t write this!):

“Israel’s air attack on Syria last month was directed against a site that Israeli and American intelligence analysts judged was a partly constructed nuclear reactor, apparently modeled on one North Korea has used to create its stockpile of nuclear weapons fuel, according to American and foreign officials with access to the intelligence reports.

The description of the target addresses one of the central mysteries surrounding the Sept. 6 attack, and suggests that Israel carried out the raid to demonstrate its determination to snuff out even a nascent nuclear project in a neighboring state. The Bush administration was divided at the time about the wisdom of Israel’s strike, American officials said, and some senior policy makers still regard the attack as premature.”


“Many details remain unclear, most notably how much progress the Syrians had made in construction before the Israelis struck, the role of any assistance provided by North Korea, and whether the Syrians could make a plausible case that the reactor was intended to produce electricity. In Washington and Israel, information about the raid has been wrapped in extraordinary secrecy and restricted to just a handful of officials, while the Israeli press has been prohibited from publishing information about the attack.

and (even the NYT feels guilty enough that it has to explain itself):

The target of the Israeli raid and the American debate about the Syrian project were described by government officials and nongovernment experts interviewed in recent weeks in the United States and the Middle East. All insisted on anonymity because of rules that prohibit discussing classified information. The officials who described the target of the attack included some on each side of the debate about whether a partly constructed Syrian nuclear reactor should be seen as an urgent concern, as well as some who described themselves as neutral on the question.

As I’ve been saying all along, there are far too many hints that this is complete horseshit.  The timing and nature of the Israeli admissions are all wrong.  Normally, this kind of propaganda exercise would have been preceded by background about the Syrian ‘nuclear threat’ in the Jew-controlled press, and followed by a huge Israeli-American psych-op, with pictures and videos and images of heroic Israeli soldiers and pilots.  Steven Spielberg would then make a movie about it.  The fact that the information had to be pried out of the Israelis proves that the entire story was fabricated to cover up some unsuccessful Israeli military incursion.  Add to the circumstances of the admission the rather obvious neocon attempt to upset the delicate North Korean negotiations by bringing the North Koreans into it, and I’d say we have a conclusive case for horseshit.  You might also note the trick of using a mistranslation (a common Zionist ploy these days) to implicate the Syrians, and the complete absence of any evidence, even pictures, of a Syrian nuclear establishment.


Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Insanity and sanity

If you ever start feeling sorry for the Israelis, read this article on Arnon Soffer, a geostrategist from the University of Haifa and head of research for the IDF’s National Defense College:

“Ruthie Blum:  In our previous interview, you made many assertions about what could and should be expected to happen following the disengagement from Gaza. You claim now that everything has played out the way you said it would.

Soffer:  Yes. I said, ‘The pressure at the border will be awful. It’s going to be a terrible war. So, if we want to remain alive, we will have to kill and kill and kill.’

That statement caused a huge stir at the time, and it’s amazing to see how many dozens of angry, ignorant responses I continue to receive from leftists in Israel and anti-Semites abroad, who took my words out of context. I didn’t recommend that we kill Palestinians. I said we’ll have to kill them.

I was right about mounting demographic pressures. I am also entitled to defend myself and my country. So today, I would update the headline you gave my last interview and call this one: ‘It’s the demography and anti-Semitism, stupid.’”

Note how Soffer instinctively uses the slur to defend himself against a completely justified criticism for advocating mass killing of Palestinians.  Note how his other line of defense, also predictable (the Zionists are like robots!), is self-defense.  This isn’t some marginal nut:  he’s a key advisor to the Israeli government:

“We are living in a 100-year period of terrorism, and we have another 100 years of terrorism ahead of us. We will forever be forced to live by the sword. We are not wanted in the Middle East, which is why we will have to continue to fight.

The purpose of disengagement was not to put an end to terrorism or Kassam fire. Its purpose was to stop being responsible for a million and a half Arabs who continue to multiply in conditions of poverty and madness. I am thrilled that we are out of there. The Kassams do not constitute a strategic threat, and the Palestinians will get the blow they deserve - though we do have to be cautious, because the situation is complex.”

And, shades of ‘no dogs or niggers’:

“Our government has woken up. The only ones making noise are leftists and so-called human rights lawyers who only care about the well-being of cats, dogs and Palestinians, but never about Jews.”

He continues with a completely clear statement on the purpose of the apartheid wall:

“Thanks to this completely crazy security fence [here he points to another map, and runs his finger along the jagged line delineating it], we have succeeded in reducing the suicide bombings to zero. This by itself is a huge accomplishment. But [former prime minister Ariel] Sharon’s real achievement, which the public doesn’t appreciate, is having included Modi’in, Betar Illit and Ma’aleh Adumim in Israel. In other words, 180,000 Jews remain within greater Jerusalem with American support.

Today there are 270,000 settlers in the territories, and their numbers are increasing, through natural growth and due to Bnei Akiva members moving there. Through Sharon’s cleverness, Jerusalem remains in Israel and 210,000 settlers are within the fence. Only 60,000 remain outside. In other words, 86% of the settlers are at home. This is an unbelievable victory.”

Revelations about a conspiracy involving the American State Department:

“So, now you’re asking me - and rightly so - whether we have to evacuate the rest of the territories. Since our last interview, I have changed my mind about the Jordan Valley. I said then that we were probably going to have to relinquish it. I had been persuaded that there was no longer an eastern-front threat, now that Iraq had become friendly, that Syria was rusty and that our strategic peace with Jordan was sound. But then, suddenly, in November 2005, there was a suicide attack in Amman, which showed that there are al-Qaida cells there.

I also said that we would have to hold on to the Philadelphi Corridor in order to prevent an Egyptian-Gazan connection. Now, if we put our hands to our hearts, we have to admit that the IDF failed to secure Philadelphi - a 200-meter wide and 10-kilometer long area, on one side of which is a terrible country like Egypt, and on the other side of which is Iran. According to reliable sources, Iran was already in Gaza 10 months before disengagement. Why am I bringing this up in connection with the Jordan Valley? [President of the Council on Foreign Relations] Richard Haass, who was director of policy planning for the US State Department at the time, told me personally: ‘We’ll allow Israel to establish a ‘Philadelphi Corridor’ in the Jordan Valley, to guarantee the neutralization and demilitarization of Judea and Samaria.’”

Destroy, destroy and destroy:

“It’s because the IDF failed that we made that deal. That’s why today I think we have to retain control of both the Philadelphi Corridor and the Jordan Valley.

And if we return to Philadelphi, it will no longer be a mere 200 meters. It will have to be widened at the expense of the refugee camps in Rafah, which we will have to destroy, destroy and destroy.”

Israeli thinking on Iran (note that the suggestion would also destroy the world economy):

“I want to tell you: Two missiles on the Iranian islands of Karaj and Siri, and Iran’s entire oil revenue drops from $60 billion to zero. Iran is so weak and vulnerable that it’s unbelievable.”

Soffer sounds like a madman, but he represents mainstream Israeli strategic thinking.  Ran HaCohen visits the ‘peace plan’ of the Israeli right, which is essentially the complete ethnic cleansing of the Occupied Territories together with the formalization of the apartheid process to cover Arabs in Israel proper (so that they may be ethnically cleansed in due course).  As he points out, the craziest ideas of the Israeli right are the ideas of the IDF, and since Israel is a military dictatorship, soon become mainstream Israeli thinking.

Finally, the American Establishment, in a fight to the death with Jew-control in Washington, finally describes a reasonable settlement to the Palestinian problem, following their recent epiphany that such a settlement is necessary for real American interests.  Too bad they didn’t come up with this twenty years ago.

Monday, October 15, 2007

No fingerprints, and an improbable artery

The Daily Mail is reporting that there were no fingerprints on the knife that David Kelly supposedly used to kill himself, and that his death was the only one reported that year in Britain caused by the cutting of that particular artery.  This information comes from the private investigation of Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker. 

The new information is not a surprise for those who know he didn’t commit suicide.  It was Kelly’s own knife, meaning his own fingerprints should have been on it, meaning that the agents who staged the suicide scene didn’t use gloves to handle the knife, and therefore had to wipe it clean of all fingerprints.  This seems to be an indication of lack of professionalism in staging the scene, as does cutting an artery which wouldn’t cause death, but we’ve seen numerous examples where lack of competence doesn’t preclude involvement of intelligence professionals.

Somehow or other a complete judicial inquiry was held with no indication whatsoever that the knife that was supposedly the cause of death lacked the fingerprints that it would have had to have had for Kelly to have wielded the knife himself.  If we didn’t have enough evidence of the joke that was the Hutton inquiry, we do now.  A Freedom of Information request to Thames Valley Police was required to dig up the information on the fingerprints, which presumably the police felt was irrelevant to the inquiry.  After everything, we are still left without a plausible cause of death for David Kelly.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Who's behind the Armenian genocide resolution?

Who's behind the Armenian genocide resolution?  Tom Lantos (D-Tel Aviv) is involved, so you could take a wild guess.  We’re told it has something to do with the strength of the Armenian Lobby!  Juan Cole says its the pro-Kurdish branch of the Israeli Lobby winning out over the pro-Turkish branch of the Israeli Lobby.  He lost me there.  On its face, it looks like a big Lobby loss, as the Lobby protects Israeli ally Turkey, and has its own reasons for downplaying the importance of any holocaust that doesn’t involve the Chosen People.  There’s a sort of holocaust beauty contest going on, and other genocidal mass murders diminish the beauty of the winner.

Who's behind the Armenian genocide resolution?  Its pretty simple, isn’t it?  It is the timing that is odd, so the timing should tell us something.  Why stir up this issue and cause problems with Turkish-American relations at this particular time, when Iraq is a mess and the Kurds are making the Turks very nervous?  The keystone to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East is breaking Iraq into three parts.  The rupture was supposed to occur almost immediately after the American attack.  Since that didn’t happen, the ‘surge’ was created to cause massive additional violence with the idea that the country couldn’t hold together under the strain.  Unfortunately for the Zionists, the ‘surge’ has actually made the Iraqis even more united, as they don’t want to give the Jews the pleasure of seeing Iraq destroyed.  State Department diplomacy is the only thing calming the Turks down enough to keep them from a full-fledged attack on Kurdistan.  The resolution has so enraged the Turks that it is the Zionist hope that the State Department will no longer be able to stop the Turks from attacking.  Putting Kurdistan into play is intended to cause Iraq to fall apart.  The Israelis have decided to instruct their American operatives that breaking Iraq up is so important to Zionist colonialism that Israel is prepared to sell out both its supposed allies, the Turks and the Kurds (not to mention the Americans!).

The resolution has nothing to do with appeasing the powerful (!) Armenian lobby, and does no favors to either the Turks or the Kurds.  The only beneficiaries are Zionists who want to use a Turkish attack on Kurdistan to break up Iraq.


From Mondoweiss (emphasis in red):

I know my people don't control the news media, but in reflecting on the many print reviews of The Israel Lobby (good and bad, but mostly bad), I'm struck by how many of them have been penned by Jews. Michael Lerner, David Remnick, Richard Cohen, Jeffrey Goldberg, Leslie Gelb, Samuel Freedman. Maybe I'm missing some gentile voices, but isn't there some value in diversity here? Could someone have assigned the book to James Baker, Francis Fukuyama, Fritz Hollings or Jimmy Carter?

This is starting to get silly, even tragic.  Of course ‘your people’ control the news media.  I’m going to have to insist on this, as it is vitally important.  Can anyone otherwise explain why the American media reports on both sides of every other issue in the world, including things obviously embarrassing to American elites, but utterly fails to even mention the plight of the Palestinians?  Why every other media in the world reports on this in great detail, but not a word in the American media?  I could, of course, name names, but why bother?  Res ipsa loquitor.  The thing speaks for itself.  Unless you want to follow some bizarre Noamian conspiracy theory that for some unexplained reason Wall Street has a particular hatred of Palestinians, there is no other possible explanation.  In fact, until very recently, when Establishment fury at the neocon Iraq deception has led to a slight glasnost, American coverage of Israel and the Middle East has been nothing less than surreal, and can only be compared to the media in the Soviet Union.

If it wasn’t for the lies and deceptions, I could care less who controls the American media.  Unfortunately, a relatively small handful of people, who are Jewish, and who have a monomania for Israeli colonialism, are deceiving Americans with one purpose in mind.  Its not just the owners, publishers, writers, editors, reporters, producers, directors, etc., but also the businessmen who are prepared to threaten to withdraw advertising if they catch even a hint of coverage that might possibly interfere with Israeli land theft.  It is a whole bunch of one-issue guys, whose issue is Israel, people who are even prepared to take decisions that will cost them money as long as the ScareJew is kept at bay.  It is the general climate of fear, that careers will be ruined if the Likudnik party line isn’t followed to the letter.  Jew-control of the American media is one of the main reasons who the United States has made such horrible decisions concerning the Middle East, and the first step to fixing the problem is shining a light on it.  Anyone who denies the obvious is a lite Zionist, or worse.

It is particularly striking that the Jerusalem Post is crowing about Jew-control at exactly the same time when it is considered anti-Semitic in America to even mention it.  Another Emperor’s New Clothes moment!  It is also striking that Weiss himself, in the same paragraph as the howler, points out that the American media consistently picked members of the Lobby – not just Jews, but those involved in the Lobby lies that led to the attack on Iraq! – to review a book critical of the Lobby, without even mentioning the obvious conflict.  I suppose this is just a coincidence, or a reflection of how hard it is to find a book reviewer these days.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Love in an Airport Bathroom

The joke in Overcompensating/Wigu is that everybody is extremely logical, once you accept the absurd premises, which tend to resemble real life a little too closely.  The tiny writing in red under the cartoons is also worth reading.

Lucy in Annapolis

We’re heading for another in what seems to be the never-ending series of Lucy moments with the Annapolis peace conference.  The propaganda message is being set, expectations are being lowered (based, naturally, on the failings of the Palestinians), all in the context of an extremely weak Israeli government with a Jewish population that is firmly committed to never giving up any of the lands stolen in 1967.  The current charade features rumors of returning parts of Jerusalem to the Palestinians, followed by the predictable chorus of boos from the Israeli right, all as part of the commotion required for Lucy to pull the football away.

The South African leaders saw the writing on the wall and, in the face of consternation from their constituents, decided to make the best deal they could while they could.  I’ve been pointing out that Israeli leaders have a real problem with missiles, one that they are pretending to deal with by erecting a propaganda missile defense system.  The big brains in Israel have to know that this system is only useful for fooling Israeli civilians, and will be relatively useless against real missiles.  Military technology has permanently changed the facts on the ground in the area around Israel, something only brought home with the recent embarrassing defeat of the IDF in Lebanon (not to mention the recent obviously failed mission to Syria).  At what point do Israeli leaders decide to make the best deal they can while they can?  Or are Israeli leaders simply not of the caliber of the white South African leaders? 

There is an additional time pressure being applied with the sudden and remarkable success of the Walt and Mearsheimer book.  At some point, the dam erected by the Jew-controlled media in the United States will break, and the plight of the Palestinians, hitherto completely hidden by the American media, will be all over the news.  The two strong theses – that the disaster of the Iraq war wouldn’t have happened but for the Lobby, and that single-minded support of Likudnik policies is against the real interests of Americans – will suddenly be in debate.  At that point, Israel’s bargaining position suddenly becomes immeasurably weaker.  The question for Israeli leaders is how much longer the Jew-controlled media can continue to lie to Americans.

Thursday, October 11, 2007


Ann Coulter thinks the Jews need to be perfected.  She’s gotten away with saying every offensive thing imaginable;  will this be the first thing she has to apologize for?

Ontario 2; Haters and Enslavers 0

Good news from the Ontario provincial election:  the voters have decisively rejected both:

  1. The sectarian hatred of provincially-funded faith-based schools (a h-u-g-e defeat for Christian Evangelists and Official Jewry); and

  2. The enslavery of a German-style proportional electoral system, sticking with the only true system for the free, first-past-the-post.

More soon.

I guess

Abe Foxman makes an attempt (found via here) at debating John Mearsheimer.  As you might expect, it is not pretty, and Mearsheimer wins easily.  Note the slur strategy in Foxman’s opening words (emphasis in red):

“The deadly lie is the concept that Jews, wherever they are, disproportionately control government means of media in order to promote their interests.

Mearsheimer and Walt in their book basically say that the lobby, which is I guess all those American Jews and some Zionist Christians who support Israel, distort what is America's interest, distort what is in the best interest of the United States, in order to serve the interests of Israel and support of Israel.”

To give Abe credit, he can’t bring himself to state this whopper of a mischaracterization of the Walt/Mearsheimer position without qualifying it by saying ‘I guess’.  Since it is his guess, he psychologically protects himself from the outright lie he has to tell in order to make the slur.  It’s always a two-step process for the Lobby defenders:

  1. Grossly misstate the theses of the Book, especially by saying that Walt/Mearsheimer are talking about all American Jews and not just the Lobby; then

  2. claim that the authors can be dismissed as anti-Semites based on the misstatements.

What I really admire about Walt/Mearsheimer is that they are careful to avoid any possibility of credible slurring, while not chickening out on the strong positions.  Mearsheimer says “one of the principal reasons – not the only reason, but one of the principal reasons – that the United States went to war against Iraq was because of the Israel lobby and Israel itself pushing for it.”  He goes on (emphasis in red):

“Our claim is that the Israel lobby, which is not the Jewish lobby and is not the American-Jewish community, was pushing for the war. With regard to AIPAC, there is hard evidence that AIPAC was pushing for the war.

Howard Kohr, who is the executive director of AIPAC, told the New York Sun in January 2003 that one of his most important accomplishments for the previous year was quietly pushing for the war in Iraq up on Capitol Hill. So there is evidence that AIPAC was in favor of the war.”

He later says (clearly connecting the undeniable Jewish Billionaire Lobby for an Iran attack with the similar efforts for an Iraq attack):

“Well, if you look around the world, there's only one country that is actively pushing the United States to seriously consider military action against Iran, and that country is Israel. Not only its leaders, but its population is in favor of using military force against Iran, if necessary.

Furthermore, if you look at who the voices are inside the United States who are pushing for using military force against Iran, it's essentially the same cast of characters who pushed for war against Iraq. And most of those people, certainly not all of them, but most of them are in the lobby.”

Of course, Walt/Mearsheimer are even more courageous in taking the strongest position – beyond the one that the Lobby influence ought to be debated –  that Lobby influence on the United States has hurt American interests.  My guess is that they might have been content with a safer course had people like Foxman not so misrepresented and slurred them.  Whatever the Jewish Billionaires are paying Foxman, it is far too much.

There are no homosexuals in Israel

Remember when the Jew-controlled media made a big thing about Ahmadinejad’s remarks on homosexuality in Iran?  They needed to suppress the fact that he sounded perfectly reasonable on all other matters, denied threatening Israel or wanting nukes, and said he wasn’t a Holocaust denier but wondered why the Palestinians were the ones who had to pay for the Holocaust.  Since this didn’t in the least fit the Ahmadinejad=Hitler Zionist equation, the only thing the Jew-controlled media could find to say was to play up Bollinger’s amazingly rude introductory remarks as if they were factually true (the National Post, the world’s worst newspaper in part for its previous error of the year work on Iran, actually printed an above-the-fold picture of Ahmadinejad on its first page, together with the worst selected excerpts from Bollinger, as if they were facts about Ahmadinejad!), and make fun of Ahmadinejad for saying there were no homosexuals in Iran.  This part of his presentation always seemed odd to me, as Ahmadinejad is an educated man, not the idiot the Jew-controlled American media likes to depict, and the rendering in English of his words was terrible, making the whole translation suspect.

Now it turns out that the translation was indeed faulty (see also here).  Conspiracy question:  was a bad translator intentionally chosen to make Ahmadinejad look bad and give the Jew-controlled media some ammunition?  Given Bollinger’s unbelievable introduction (the Jewish Billionaires must have had his nuts in the wringer!), we can’t rule it out.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Preemptive anti-slur self-preservation response

American institutions which value their reputations are now preemptively self-censoring any event connected with them that might possibly raise future objections from the Zionist Intellectual Complex, that web of slurrers sponsored by the JBC that stand ever-vigilant, ready to deploy the slur weapon when it is required to protect Zionist colonialism.  This self-censorship is a pattern that can’t be ignored.  Two points:

  1. The slur – which is, after all, just words – remains unbelievably powerful in American public life.  Its power is the product of fifty years of propaganda.

  2. At some point, the slur will break under the weight of all the lies it has to support.  The only question is whether it will break before it results in the utter destruction of the United States, or after.  I’m not exaggerating in the slightest:  if Americans don’t get over their slur-phobia very quickly, they’re going to be unable to muster the intellectual resources to stop themselves from being manipulated into ‘foreign entanglements’ that will wreck American power.  Since the American ‘lifestyle’ depends entirely on American power, the end of American power will end the American ‘way of life’ as Americans know it.

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Get your bulldozer ride while you still can

Richard Dawkins:

“When you think about how fantastically successful the Jewish lobby has been, though, in fact, they are less numerous I am told – religious Jews anyway – than atheists and [yet they] more or less monopolise American foreign policy as far as many people can see. So if atheists could achieve a small fraction of that influence, the world would be a better place.”

Needless to say, Dawkins received an immediate drive-by slurring (see also here, but note that most of the commentators see right through the bullshit).  At the rate things are going, people will soon laugh whenever they hear the slur.

Monday, October 08, 2007

Junk the junkets

As part of the new grassroots program whereby Americans are bypassing the lying chattering classes and slowing starting to reclaim their country from foreign control, the ethics commission in Montgomery County, Maryland has decided that council members are prohibited from traveling at the expense of the local Jewish community, even when the funding is disguised by indirectly providing it from a private foundation.  From The Forward (found via Undernews):

“The decision has such weight because sponsored trips to Israel are widely used by Jewish groups both nationally and locally to build support for Israel among non-Jewish leaders and to cultivate one-to-one relationships between American and Israeli leaders. On a national level, the trips have recently come under scrutiny amid the scandals surrounding Washington lobbyists and their relationships with lawmakers. The Montgomery County decision now brings the dilemma to the local level, as communities face the need to adjust to the changing winds in Washington and growing concerns about the power of lobbyists.”

This is an excellent, and necessary, first step.  It would be nice if Americans could get to the point where taking such a junket renders a politician unelectable.

The Lobby is a racket

One of the most important things to know about the Lobby is that it is so powerful, and so ruthless, that those who have felt its influence are terrified to talk about it.  Thus, the relative shortage of anecdotal evidence about how it operates.  That’s why this posting by wmtriallawyer at Daily Kos is so useful (reprinted here in case it disappears; considering it is at the notoriously censored Daily Kos, it is nothing short of a miracle that it is still there!;  needless to say, wmtriallawyer was immediately slurred; my emphasis throughout in red):

“A little over 10 years ago, I got my ‘formal’ start in politics.  I worked as the field coordinator for Julia Carson during her first run for the House.  It was heady stuff for a wide-eyed kid who loved politics.  Fresh of my experience from working for Jim Hightower, I wanted to get out there and take the House back from two years of Newt Gingrich maddness.

Our race was one of those ‘top 25’ targets Charlie Cook and gang liked to talk about.  And because of it, we got quite a few Washington consultants coming out the campaign to give their advice and support.  It was then I began to notice an alarming trend.

Over and over, we began to hear about how we needed to tap into the ‘Jewish vote.’ Odd, I thought, because in my naivete I never considered the ‘Jewish vote’ to be some sort of voting bloc.  Then, however, the talk of the ‘Jewish vote’ began to morph into the chase for ‘Jewish money.’

This was a real wake-up call to me, because it sounded so insidious and seemed to reinforce a stereotype.  We talked about reaching out to other interest groups for votes: African-Americans, Hispanics, gays and lesbians.  But we never talked about getting ‘African-American money’ or ‘gay and lesbian money.’

Anyway, we were quickly told that the way to tap into the Jewish vote and money was to demonstrate unfettered support for Israel.  So, some of our folks wrote up a few quick talking points, put out a one-pager, and voila! – we support Israel.  That should do it.

I wish it had ended there.”


“I began to see how the ‘game’ was played, that the concern for reelection and keeping power was more important than using power to effectuate change.  And that became starkly clear when AIPAC contacted my boss.

My boss went on an all-expense paid trip to Israel on AIPAC's dime.  It was one of those educational junkets that interest groups paid for.  I was a little concerned about it, but I paid it little mind.  She had a wonderful time and learned a lot.

But as the saying goes, nothing in life comes for free.  A few months later, Congress was voting on that year's foreign aid bill.  As a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Carson opposed the bill, because it contained far few dollars for Africa than needed to be in the bill.  However, there was a substantial amount of money going to Israel.

After her opposition became public, and she voted against it, the calls started coming in from all corners of the U.S.  Members of AIPAC called to say that Rep. Carson was wrong for opposing the bill because it helped Israel.  She tried to explain, but in all honesty, some of the callers were really angry.  Mind you, hardly any of the folks that called were her constituents...they were donors.  And they thought they had a solid vote because of the Israel trip.  And some of them were plenty rude on the phone.

Rep. Carson became frustrated and one day said, ‘I just don't know what they want from me.’

I was silent when I heard this, but I knew what they wanted.  They wanted her vote. And in the back of my head, I was thinking that she shouldn't have taken that trip to Israel.

The points to note:

  1. When anyone talks about getting the ‘Jewish vote’ – odd when there are usually no Jews to vote – they really mean ‘Jewish money’.

  2. It is the donors, i.e., the Jewish Billionaires, who call the shots, not the Jewish voters.

  3. As we know, the Jewish Billionaires are ‘one-issue guys’, and everything turns around fealty to Israel, or at least Likud party policies.

  4. The best way to describe the actions of the Jewish Billionaires is to think of an organized crime gang.  Organized crime will usually leave you alone, unless, for some reason, you incur some kind of obligation to them.  Then, on the twisted logic of the thugs, they feel they can put any and all pressure on you, and exact whatever tribute they desire, even if it is greatly out of proportion to the original obligation.  They feel that they literally own you.  Note the relatively small obligation – the free trip to Israel – followed by the assumption, rudely insisted upon by people who don’t even have the right to insist, that you must comply with all their demands.  Of course, if the extreme pressure tactics fail, they will turn the matter over to the money men, the leg-breakers, who will use their money to ensure you are not reelected.  Since every Washington politician knows the drill, it rarely comes to that, and the pressure almost always works.  Thus, for example, we see a constant stream of the most outrageously pro-Israel/pro-Likudnik resolutions in the U. S. Senate, passed by numbers like 99–1 or 98–2. 

You just have to laugh when the Lobby employees claim that the Lobby has no power.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Fair-minded reviews, and the slur

The reviews by Milton Viorst and Daniel Levy of the Book are both intellectually respectable and fair-minded, albeit both from a lite Zionist perspective (neither is keen on admitting the Zionist role in the attack on Iraq, and there is considerable obfuscation on the connections between the Likud, the neocons, and the Lobby, which are much, much stronger than lite Zionists are prepared to admit).  Contrast these reviews with that of ultra-Zionist Jeffrey Goldberg (see Finkelstein on Goldberg here), where every paragraph is another slight variation on the same theme, that Mearsheimer and Walt are anti-Semites.  That’s the sum total of the review, repeated ad infinitum, ad nauseam (read the review and see how obvious it is; when you have the key, it’s almost funny!).  Goldberg has nothing in the way of real criticism, so he just slurs.  There is something so intellectually shoddy about this that I don’t know how Goldberg gets away with it.  Having Goldberg write a review about a book on the Lobby is like having O. J. review a book on the murder of his wife, except it is even worse, as people would get that joke, while most readers of the Goldberg review wouldn’t realize that he is a part of the Lobby, and hopelessly conflicted.

The slur is an ad hominem argument, one that attacks the person making the argument rather than the merits of the argument.  You can see how it would be popular with the Zionists, who haven’t an intellectual leg to stand on.  Unfortunately, their arguments are even worse than that.  They have absolutely no basis for assuming that Mearsheimer and Walt are anti-Semites (in fact, Walt is married to a half-Jewish woman).  Their position, if you can believe it, is that the argument of rich Jewish political control resembles arguments which have been made in the past by people who have been identified as anti-Semites.  That’s it!  That’s their argument!  It’s not even an ad hominem argument, it’s an ad hominem argument once removed!  In fact, it is not at all clear that the people making these arguments in the past were actually anti-Semites (I think Henry Ford clearly was not).  Even more important, there is a huge difference between the old arguments they refer to and the kind of arguments being made today.

The classic bigoted/racist statement is ‘The X are Y’, where X is an identifiable minority and Y is a disagreeable trait.  This is bigoted because of the generalization.  It is unfair, and necessarily racist, to label all members of a group in that way.  The old arguments referred to by the Zionists all take the form that some unidentified group of Jewish people, plotting in secret, are controlling the government.  This is bigoted as it potentially refers to any Jewish person, and thus unfairly connects membership in an identified group with an allegation which is negative and possibly harmful.  Arguments like those of Mearsheimer and Walt don’t make that mistake.  They clearly identify the culprits.  The fact that most of the culprits are Jewish happens to be connected to their motive.  It is unfortunate for the wider Jewish community that this Likudnik attitude exists amongst a segment of the American Jewish community, but it does, and they have to deal with it.  Identifying the specific culprits makes it logically impossible for the argument to be bigoted.  In fact, the premise of the argument is expressly that the wider American Jewish community is not responsible for the actions of the identified few.  The fact that those identified are either rich or work for organizations funded by the rich is simply a function of power:  the rich have the means to fund the Zionist plans.  The fact that concern for wealth is also a feature of traditional anti-Semitism is just an unfortunate coincidence, something, again, that the wider Jewish community is going to have to deal with.

Of course, there are variations of the slur.  Here is Philip Weiss, who should know better, casting the slur (my emphasis in red):

“A reader responded to my question of yesterday – Why hasn't C-Span aired Walt & Mearsheimer's appearance at Politics and Prose? – saying that the answer may be found in the Board of Directors of C-SPAN. http://www.c-span.org/about/company/index.asp?code=BOARD

The reader noted that the board's executive committee includes Robert Miron, chairman and ceo of Advance/Newhouse Communications, and then included this tidbit:

Miron’s community activities include past president of the Syracuse Jewish Community Center, former vice president of Temple Adath Yeshurun, former board member of the Syracuse Jewish Federation, and member of the Metropolitan Development Association. He was the Temple Adath Citizen of the Year in 2000.

The reader also cited Allen Block, vice chair of the C-Span board, noting that Block's grandfather Paul, the founder of Block Communications, was a poor Jewish immigrant from Poland who had fled persecution there. (As my grandfather did.)

These comments are anti-semitic. I strongly doubt that the presence of these two Jews is why C-Span isn't airing Walt & Mearsheimer. And yet I can't utterly refute the reader.”

I suppose you might think that this is somewhat like racial profiling.  There’s a problem, look for the Jew!  If that were all there was to it, it would be anti-Semitism.  That’s not what we have here:

  1. prominent Jews;

  2. who are rich, and thus fit the profile of those who can say “I'm a one-issue guy and my issue is Israel”;

  3. and in a position of power and control over a particular organization;

  4. which, completely inexplicably, given the fact that this issue directly falls under its broadcasting mandate, have failed to cover the matter.

In other words, this isn’t the case of randomly stopping black guys after a shooting on the dubious and lazy and racist police grounds that black guys commit more crimes.  It is like stopping a black guy running away from the scene of the crime with a smoking gun in his hand.  It can’t be wrong to believe that Miron and Block have questions to answer on this matter.  They may have had nothing to do with the bizarre decision of C-Span to avoid the issue.  But it can’t be anti-Semitic to raise the coincidence of how power and strange decisions seem to go together.  Given the other factors, it is not unfair to consider them suspects.  Confusing matters by misusing the slur is eventually going to make the slur meaningless.

The only possible culprit

Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah, makes the startlingly obvious point that Israel is behind the recent assassinations in Lebanon.  Let’s see:

  1. Assassinations which only benefit Israel (and don’t benefit Syria);

  2. Done in a manner – car bombs – which we know the Mossad has used in Lebanon;

  3. Followed immediately by the Jew-controlled American press screaming ‘Syria did it!’;

  4. And used as part of the propaganda ammunition for the UN Hariri investigation, obviously as part of a campaign to bring down the Syrian government.

Might there be a pattern?


The new American grassroots campaign

This is a pretty good start on the new American grassroots campaign to root the Zionist traitors out of the American government.  The attack on Iraq was warning enough, but the same people are up to the same plans, plans which will lead to tragedies which will make Iraq look like a walk in the park.  The Zionist cult can’t help itself; it will keep destroying until it is stopped.  Americans can’t rely on the American Establishment to protect them forever.  The disease has to be eliminated.  Eventually, it should be considered to be unpatriotic for Americans to buy products made by the Jewish Billionaires.  We know exactly who they are, and a list of their products should be made.  A complete boycott on Hollywood movies might be an idea.

David Wurmser, Israeli agent

David Wurmser makes a surprise reappearance out of the ooze to call for an attack on Syria, but not one on Iraq.  There are two things to remember about Wurmser:

  1. If he could still be even the slightest use to the Likudniks, he’d still be in the Bush Administration.

  2. He’s safe now, and under Zionist President Rudary, but still has to worry about the possibility that, at some point, once the Americans officially accept how punked they were, somebody is going to want to prosecute him for treason.  In fact, both the United States and Israel might very well regard Wurmser as a traitor.

Wurmser is calling for ‘regime change’ in Syria in order to so embarrass the government in Iran that it leads to ‘regime change’ in Iran.  This is obviously silly, and the real plan is to somehow fool Americans into participating in an Israeli attack on Syria.  The joint security agreement between Syria and Iran would then kick in, leading to Iran intervening, providing a direct excuse for an American attack on Iran.  We can see the recent spectacular failure of the Israeli probing operation in Syria as part of this new Likudnik plan (obviously, Agent Wurmser acts on direct orders from Tel Aviv).

Note how Wurmser takes it as a given that it is in American interests to take on Iran, because  “who they are is now defined around provoking a wider clash of civilisations with the West”, conveniently forgetting neocon efforts to suppress the fact that Iran has made peace overtures to the United States, overtures secretly rebuffed by Wurmser and his crew of Israelis in the White House.  An attack on Iran is only in the interests of the Likudniks in Israel, no one else, and certainly is not in American interests.

Wurmser is careful to dismiss the charge that he was behind a plot to force his President into war by having Israel attack Iran.  He’s laying the groundwork for a defense to the future treason charges.  Nevertheless, he still works for Israel, and this new plan, part of his fascination with the domino theory which underlies his Zionist Plan for the Middle East, is just another means to the same end of tricking the Americans into a war that would destroy American power and wealth.  Luckily, as we (should) all know by now (wasn’t the attack on Iran supposed to start in September? for sure this time?!), the adults are back in charge in Washington, and they won’t be fooled again.

Saturday, October 06, 2007


I’ve been deplorably lax in looking after the blogroll, and will try to clean it up a bit.  I’ve added David Irving.  His comments are some of the most interesting you’ll find on the internet, even if you don’t agree with him. 

There has long been this weird superstition about linking, that there are some sites you are just not supposed to link to.  This derives from an assumption, based on pre-internet thinking, that linking implies complete approval of the contents of the site linked to.  Balderdash, but backed up by the technique, ubiquitous amongst the Zionists, of attacking your postings by pointing out your ‘unsavory’ links.  I’m becoming more and more of a militant against illogicality.

I’ve noticed that some sites that used to link to me have dropped the links, I assume because of my increasing attention to the icky issue of the JBC and its malign control over American politics.  Since this is the biggest conspiracy going, I’m not going to cater to the bulldozer drivers and stop, but you can see how the process of deligitimization of truthtellers works.

Thursday, October 04, 2007

Missiles for Israel

Stephen Green writes about one of my current preoccupations, the fact that the next illegal Israeli attack on one of its neighbors will bear a terrible price for Israel, missile retaliation (emphasis in red):

“The problem with the game of offense, however, is that both sides can play it. As  I indicated in ‘Living by the Sword’, published in 1988, some Arab governments have learned that while they may not be able to defend themselves against the Israeli Air Force, they can obtain and deploy weapons against which Israel has virtually no defenses…..such as the Soviet SS-21.

In the late 1970's and early 80's, SS-21s were installed by the Soviets across Eastern Europe, and it gravely concerned the U.S. and its NATO allies. The effective range of the weapon is a little more than Mr. Eisenstadt indicated in his Washington Institute policy paper – about 80-100 miles, in fact, or enough reach all of Israel to points just south of Tel Aviv. 

Unlike the Scuds and the multiple-launch rocket systems which the Soviets sold to many of their client states across the globe in the period, the SS-21 is a tactical ballistic missile that is accurately targetable to within about 50-100 yards, and carries a payload of around one ton. It is not a Scud. At impact, it is traveling at over 2000 MPH. Launch to target times from southern Syria to northern Israel would be 3-5 minutes: Israeli pilots would not even have a chance to get their helmets on. And anti-missile systems, like the Patriot, would be about as effective as they have been to date.

Moreover, Syria has for decades been developing radiological and chemical/biological agents which could be carried in the SS-21 warheads, and these could render Israel's main air bases uninhabitable for many, many years. In the 50 year history of Arab-Israeli conflict, the moments when Israel did not have total air superiority on the battlefield have been so few and so localized as to be not worth mentioning. That's what could change in 3-5 minutes.”

He focuses on an attack on the Israeli military.  The real profound effect will be the psychological one on Israeli civilians.  Thus, the massive amount of lying (!) and spinning (!) over the obviously failed Israeli probe of Syrian/Russian air defenses around northern Syrian missile sites (not to mention all the total BS, now apparently withdrawn in the face of international guffaws, about destruction of the Syrian-North Koran nuclear alliance!).  The Israeli public can’t be allowed to know that Israel has no answer to the Russian missiles.