Monday, January 26, 2009

What is to be done?

The problem with Israel isn't just all the horrible things it has done and is doing, a list that people are now reviewing in the light of the recent slaughter. It isn't just the obvious psychopathic mental illness of the Israeli politicians coupled with a defective political system that makes change impossible. It isn't just that the political spectrum is veering rapidly to the extreme eliminationist right. It isn't just that the slaughter was supported - not just supported, but enjoyed - by the vast, vast majority of Israeli Jews and people who identify themselves as Jews around the world (moral people brought up as Jews are so disgusted by it that they no longer self-identify as Jews, hence the 'problem' of assimilationism; btw, we must stop letting them get away with the lie of distinguishing 'Jews' from 'Israeli Jews' from 'zionists' - they all have the same shared evil psychopathy). We're talking over 95 per cent support. It's outrageous that I claim blood drips from their fangs, not because it slurs them, but because it cannot do justice to the stark evil inherent in today's Judaism. Most of the few Jews who are concerned about the slaughter are 'lite', i. e., they are worried that world disgust at what the Jews are up to might delay the Project of building Greater Israel (note that another taboo, mentioning the Project, has been bravely broken, and the reaction of the fanged ones!).

No, the problem is that it is now crystal clear, to everybody who is not a Jew or a 'progressive' enabler (the 'progressive' enablers are simply covered - covered! - in the blood of Palestinian children), that the slaughter is part of a long, constantly reoccurring pattern of psychopathic violence, and that the psychos are escalating, in the three ways of escalation:
  1. the violence is becoming more and more brutal;
  2. the periods between violent outbursts are decreasing;
  3. the psychos are losing control of their ability to regulate their violent outbursts.

I can predict, without even the tiniest fear of being wrong, that sometime in the near future Israel will do something else horribly violent, probably worse than Gaza or the most recent attack on Lebanon, and will continue to do so until the Jewish state is wiped off the map.

In considering options, we are often asked to compare Israel to South Africa. This is a faulty comparison, in ways that are not flattering to the the Jews. The Boers were evil racist scumbags, but they were sane. When the time came that they could no longer reasonably expect to maintain their hold on power, they sat down and negotiated the best deal they could (and a great deal it was, giving up political power but keeping all their wealth and the control of the economy). Unlike the Jews, they were not emotionally invested in the fact that they were scumbags. They were not psychopaths No reasonable person looking at the escalation of Israeli psychopathic acts can describe Israel as sane. The Jews are a racist eliminationist supremacist group. They cannot help themselves.

Consider the terrible effect that the concept of anti-Semitism has had on the Jews. The South African whites couldn't look at the rest of the world and decide that the attacks on them were solely as a result that the world was entirely filled with 'anti-Boer-ites'. They had to accept that the rest of the world held its disgust at apartheid honestly. Not so the Jews. World Jewry has an automatic excuse for every comment on the actions of Israel: anti-Semitism. Over time, this has created a monster: Jews can literally do no wrong as any third party critic of their behavior must be motivated by this one ulterior motive, hatred of the Jews. Over time, this obsession with anti-Semitism has turned World Jewry into a psychopath, never responsible for its acts as any and all criticism is entirely evidence of the failings of the critics. It is ironic that 'progressive' enablers have played a large role in this - although, to be fair, racist supremacism is built into Judaism (I still need to write about this) - and will ultimately bear moral responsibility for the end of Israel (oh well, at least they'll still feel good about themselves).

My basic mistake in all along supporting a two state solution was thinking that the Israelis, and World Jewry, were sane, and would eventually do the rational thing. They are not sane, something which should be obvious from the pattern of irrational violent behavior (which goes back even before the establishment of the State of Israel), and the escalation. We distinguish criminals, who are responsible for their acts and are punished, from the criminally violent mentally ill, who are not responsible for their acts but still have to be removed from society for the protection of everybody. Removing Israel is not intended to punish the Jews. It is a recognition that World Jewry suffers from a terrible mental illness, and the world needs to be protected from the irrational violence of Israel. Perhaps in time, with treatment, the Jews can regain their sanity.

37 comments:

Rowan Berkeley said...

Xymph, the difference between IL and SA lies in the fact that in the case of SA the global investors on which SA depended - specifically, the gold interests - decided that it would be worth two or three decades of pressure to get them to liberalise their system, at least cosmetically. That has not as yet happened to the investors in IL. Hopefully, since they mostly use dollars rather than gold, they will simply find that their money is worthless anyway, for extraneous reasons to do with the general decline of the US as a world power.

Anonymous said...

I doubt that "...in time, with treatment, the Jews can regain their sanity."

Ashkenazis hail from the same part of the world as gypsies...do you think gypsies will ever overcome their predeliction to roam around the country and commit petty theft for survival?

gc

Anonymous said...

Believe in Christ yet?

lobro said...

a good read, xymph ... btw, South africa was a protozionist state in that it was by and large run by jews, its economy a jewish monopoly, political and military leaders taking marching orders from israel to at least the same degree as today's usa.

lobro said...

(...) the Jews can regain their sanity

you can't regain something you never had in the first place, smacks of holocaust demands ... give us back our sanity! no/ then a couple of trillion plus space death ray platforms while we play pattycake in moral sewers.

Anonymous said...

We are all a bit slow on the draw...Monty had it right awhile ago...Python

Evie

anarchore said...

Xymph must be really lazy doing his site maintenance.

There is blood seeping into your page from the link on the side you promote some Canadian progressive Zionist pig-pen.

Why don't you make an account there, Xymph and tell them about the power of the Isra-l Lobby?

See how long you last!

Aren't you a hypocrite for promoting them?:



http://www.rabble.ca/babble/international-news-and-politics/gaza-israel-hamas-etc-ii

anarchore said...

Oh by the way, excellent rant!

Anonymous said...

God the internet is great!

A SONG FOR GAZA - Michael Heart

Heart

Evie

Greg Bacon said...

Israel likes to say it is our only "friend" in the Middle East. (If a family had a member as fucking crazy as Israel, that person would have been committed to an insane asylum long, long ago)

Funny, but I can't but help to think that before Israel came into existence, the U.S. had NO enemies in the Middle East.

And Israel likes to say it's a peaceful nation.

The only peace Israel wants is: a “piece” of Jordan; a “piece” of Syria; a “piece” of Lebanon; a “piece” of Egypt; a “piece” of Iraq; a “piece” of Saudi Arabia and whatever “pieces” are left after Israel finishes it’s genocidal extermination of the Palestinians.

And if those homicidal maniacs have to kill SIX MILLION Arabs/Muslims to obtain their goal of Ertz Israel, they'll do so without any pangs of conscience.

Those two blue lines on the Star of David?
One represents the River Nile and the other, the River Euphrates.

We've secured the River Euphrates for our masters, now they're herding the Palestinians toward Egypt's Sinai Desert.

If Israel manages to terrorize the Gazans--those they don't butcher--into the Sinai, it won't be long before those Shin Bet launched Qassams appear to be coming from the Palestinian refugee camps there and off Israel will go, killing Palestinians that had escaped that crazy as batshit nation only to find themselves in the crosshairs of the IDF...again.

All those decades of using unlimited power against the Palestinians, along with their superiority complex, the West's inability to say NO and Israel's paranoia has made that nation stark, raving mad, as if they were some feral dog with rabies.

And we all know there's only ONE way to deal with a rabid dog.

Rowan Berkeley said...

Finkelstein debunked the blue stripes myth in his lecture in Edmonton last week, which I have got on Niqnaq - in the Q&A section, which is the second video of the two there.

He says Nasrallah used it in a speech, and that he himself (Finkelstein) sent Nasrallah a message via one of his aides saying it was bullshit. The explanation given by Wikipedia (which I assume is, they come from the prayer shawl, or tallit) is, according to Finkelstein, perfectly satisfactory.

Anonymous said...

Germany under the Nazis was not a Satanic society as Finkelstein suggests unless he would include the United States under Roosevelt or England under Churchill in his definition of 'Satanic'. Finkelstien continues the power structure's myths. He hasn't earned my respect yet.

Evie

Rowan Berkeley said...

well, Evie, I suspect that, at least in private, he would include them. But he is a fairly practical man.

lobro said...

maybe the blue stripes on tallit refer to nile and euphrates ... jews are practical (and practically insane, according to my theory of everything), they'll kosherize a pig if the feasibility study supports it.

5 dancing shlomos said...

the belief system is diseased. to become sane is to leave it.

more slaughter and more wars will come gratus the diseased collective

Ken Hoop said...

http://www.jewishjournal.com/israel_at_60/article/rabbis_work_to_build_ties_of_us_jews_to_israel_20080519/

As Israel celebrates the 60th anniversary of its creation, Americans are measurably less interested in Israel as they once were, especially those younger than 30. A 2007 survey by the American Jewish Congress (AJC), for example, found that only 69 percent of American Jews said "caring about Israel is a very important part of my being a Jew," compared to 74 percent in 2006 and 79 percent in 2005.

American Jewish identification with Israel is trending downward, of course not rapidly or thoroughgoingly enough. I suppose it would not be a stretch to predict Gaza will assist somewhat in this trend, again, not rapidly / thoroughgoingly as desirable.

Greg Bacon said...

Thank God!!! We're all saved from doom by pot smokers, coke heads and heroin junkies. All of those Afghani's and American kids killed fighting that "War on Terror" in Afghanistan?

Died fighting so Wall Street banks could remain profitable!!

Before we invaded Afghanistan, the Taliban had declared the growing of poppies illegal and had almost smashed the opium production coming from Afghanistan.

Since we invaded, poppy fields have multiplied to the point that the amount of opium coming out of Afghanistan is hitting record numbers

UN crime chief says drug money flowed into banks

Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:17am EST

VIENNA, Jan 25 (Reuters) - The United Nations' crime and drug watchdog has indications that money made in illicit drug trade has been used to keep banks afloat in the global financial crisis, its head was quoted as saying on Sunday.

Vienna-based UNODC Executive Director Antonio Maria Costa said in an interview released by Austrian weekly Profil that drug money often became the only available capital when the crisis spiralled out of control last year.

"In many instances, drug money is currently the only liquid investment capital," Costa was quoted as saying by Profil. "In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor."

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime had found evidence that "interbank loans were funded by money that originated from drug trade and other illegal activities," Costa was quoted as saying. There were "signs that some banks were rescued in that way."

Profil said Costa declined to identify countries or banks which may have received drug money and gave no indication how much cash might be involved. He only said Austria was not on top of his list, Profil said. (Reporting by Boris Groendahl; Editing by Charles Dick)


http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSLP65079620090125

As for the Star of David's two blue stripes, someone else also debunked that as a crazy myth.

That was Bennie Netanyahu, Israel's former and future PM who will make Olmert seem almost rational by comparison.

kei&yuri said...

The idea that the blue stripes are a proof of one aspect of a much larger plan is kind of silly. At the time the flag was decided upon, the Nile to Euphrates idea had neither been properly fleshed out nor adopted by large numbers of Zionists; the prayer shawl thing was well known, appropriate as a Jewish symbol and needs no further selling; assuming it is true we would need to explain why they chose to represent two normally unrelated rivers but ignored the various other markers of greater Israel, or for that matter why they included or excluded anything else.

Anonymous said...

I recently used the term "Judeopsychosis" on the Lenin's Tomb comments page, and was roundly dismissed with the canard "antisemitic".

Boston Jewish lawyer living in Israhell: http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2009/01/norwegian-diplomat-uses-discredited.html

and

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks on "National Holocaust Memorial Day" in The Times: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5593142.ece

I rest my case.

PS I don't hate Arabs.

moonkoon said...

Xymphora says,
My basic mistake in all along supporting a two state solution...

I used to think that a 2-state solution was a good idea (I also used to think that Zionism was an admirable concept, you know, kibbutsim and so on -until I found out about the history and ongoing brutality and hostility towards its neighbours).
I have no problem with Jews living in the Holy and (even the non Semitic variety :-) ), nor Muslims, Christians or Calathumpians for that matter.
It holds a central place in the traditions of all these faiths (and others).
Who am I to deny such spiritual comforts to others?
But it is how you do it that counts, and Jews under the Zionist Israel banner have made complete arses of themselves.
To what end, I really have no idea.

There are plenty of theories, I have discussed a few myself in the past, but ultimately they don't make a lot of sense.
This is where the suspicions about psychopathic behaviour start to nag at the psyche.
But crazy or not, it is obvious that the dream has had its day and it is time to look at what administrative solutions would help to discourage continuing the madness.

I think some sort of regional co-operation in economic and defense matters is the way to go.
Not so much a one-state solution but more of a regional union of automonous units including Lebanon, and maybe others would be interested.
But nothing will work if people can't treat each other with a modicum of respect.
People often take their cue from the state, so states, by modifying their behaviour can do a lot to encourage this mutual respect.

At the moment Israel holds most of the cards, so the onus is on it to make the running.
Best it comes up with something better before it is swept aside by the forces of destiny.
For better or for worse we have been thrown together more than at any time in our history so we need to somehow learn to get along.
It would also be a good example to the rest of the world, maybe even "a light unto nations".

All we need is a certain amount of honesty and goodwill.

Gene said...

I don't think this is very helpful to the Palestinian cause. I would even suggest that many Palestinians would find such ideas offensive.

Many Jewish bloggers have condemned Israel's onslaught on Gaza. See, for example, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

Anonymous said...

You are not even allowed to criticise Obama on Lenin's Tomb, Anonymous.

The blog is a joke!

moonkoon said...

I suggested "The Greater Palestine Co-Prosperity Sphere" as a name for the entity but Rowan thought that was a bit of a mouthful, so then I suggested New Phoenicia.

Paul said...

Anon: "Believe in Christ yet?"

No! Why does christianity always think it is the religious spackfiller of choice?

Anonymous said...

Gene 2:45 AM, January 27, 2009 - I looked over your links quickly so I may have missed it, but I don't see any mention of ending aid to Israel, boycotting Israeli businesses, institutions, government, BANKS, in effect making them a pariah in the international community.

When are Jews going to get serious?

Getting upset over Gaza is the very least they can do. Gaza is simply a logical event in the unfolding of Israel's policy since day one. Gaza is a symptom, Israel's policy is the disease.

Evie

Rowan Berkeley said...

jews will winge, but, as the rather unfortunate phrase has it, "we have to hold their feet to the fire."

5ds said...

give the area its rightful name - syria.

crown heights can be renamed israel after reparations are paid, by jews, to the blacks who were forced out.

congress can also be called israel south after jews pay reparations to the american public.

Anonymous said...

It seems to me that from the very beginning by diverting Christianity from Christ's message, that all one was left with was the idea of winning over everybody to Christianity - a Jewish idea under different name! As obama said and we should watch out what he says IN DETAIL - ! I WON! or ! I am a leftie and you've gopt to gfet used to it. " We can already see from photographs that Emanuel in his body language does not like being a servant.....
jocelyn

moonkoon said...

5ds, I prefaced my original remarks with the following quote that I stumbled upon.

'And in his anger his master sent him to the torturers until he could repay all he owed. That is how my heavenly father will deal with you unless you forgive your brothers from your heart.'
Matthew 18:34-35

James Crow said...

"but I don't see any mention of ending aid to Israel, boycotting Israeli businesses, institutions, government, BANKS, in effect making them a pariah in the international community."

Those in power controlling the world stage are not about to give up that power. You can boycott all you want, Israel will be well taken care of. I don't personally agree with their policies, but in the long run, the big picture, nothing I do will change anything on the world stage. I can intellectualize with the best of them should I want to uh, waste that much time checking references and proffering ideas and "solutions" but in my opinion none of it will make any difference or function as a catalyst of change. You can hate evil and psychopathic zionists all you want but what will you change with your efforts...?

Rowan Berkeley said...

They want all sorts of opposition, worldwide, including lethal attacks. This is in order to provide the pretexts necessary to install their eventual, globally enforceable, thought-crime laws. It will be claimed that all free speech is potentially inflammatory and must be vetted.

Anonymous said...

Fine, how long do you suppose people are going to put up with that? Besides, if it isn't one thing that causes thought-crimes laws to be implemented, it will be another. They are hell bent on having their way.

Evie

Rowan Berkeley said...

The way I see it, the peculiar ambiguous position of Israel, as simultaneously a particular geographical state with a systematically provocative pattern of behaviour towards its geographical neighbours, and at the same time the focus of a completely global, Jewish Diasporic agitation based on irrational fantasies and phobias about nazis, is a perfectly crafted pretext for the sort of global thought-crime regime I suggest - but only if it is loyal to the reigning military hegemon of the planet, which at least until recently seemed to be the USA.

Ken Hoop said...

Berkeley

I guarantee an increase of effective "militant Islam" attacks on interests America-Zion Empire will represent continued victories for all who wish to restore America the nation,dismantling the Empire.

Ken Hoop said...

Berkeley

I guarantee an increase of effective "militant Islam" attacks on interests America-Zion Empire will represent continued victories for all who wish to restore America the nation,dismantling the Empire.

Ken Hoop said...

Berkeley

I guarantee an increase of effective "militant Islam" attacks on interests of America-Zion Empire will represent continued victories for all who wish to restore America the nation,dismantling the Empire.

Ken Hoop said...

sorry re the reposts.