"One aim of the American invasion here was to establish a moderate center of Shiite Islam, democratically inclined and oriented to the West, that would be a counterbalance to Iran’s system of clerical rule. However, something like the reverse seems to have happened. As Iran has used its political connections to hold great sway over Iraq’s leadership class, and has backed militias responsible for assassinations and attacks on American bases, it has been less successful wielding other mechanisms of power at a grass-roots level."This is the 8th/9th step of the Zionist plan for the Middle East. It is odd to read it in so many words in the New York Times, which consistently suppresses such information (it sounds ridiculous as an American goal when you consider how much money Americans spent on it). Of course, the Times spent a considerable amount of time
Also odd from the NYT: "Scientists’ Analysis Disputes F.B.I. Closing of Anthrax Case". Now, if Ivins didn't do it (and could not possibly have done it), and Steven Hatfill didn't do it, and Ayaad Assaad didn't do it, it was almost certainly an operation by the Camel Club (the two damning facts: the letter accusing Assaad was written before the story was public but after the anthrax letters were mailed, and a member of the Camel Club was let into the Ft. Detrick lab at as time he had no business being there), a Zionist false flag attack intended to simultaneously threaten Democratic Senators into passing the Patriot Act (the cornerstone of that War For The Jews known as the 'War on Terror'), while making it seem that it was another attack by Islamists. Needless to say, this real terrorist attack - as opposed to those manufactured by the FBI - will never be honestly investigated, as it is simply politically impossible to reveal a Zionist false flag attack on the American government and people.