Of course, we can always get lucky.

"How Bibi Messed Up His Bomb Chart"  It appears that Bibi is suffering from some sort of medical problem.  Tertiary syphilis?  It is so bad that the American Jew-controlled media has started to consider censoring his worst blunders from the American public.

"US Military Classifies Wikileaks As 'Enemy Of The United States'"

"Scientology's Secret Intelligence Service"

""Other duties related to security" in Libya"

"Top Syria official leaving the State Department'  Assad is going to outlast them all.

"Taking the Conspiracy Genre Up a Notch With the Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics"

"Israel lobbyist hints that ‘Pearl Harbor’ may be needed to get US into war with Iran"  Ledeen (1990) - ". . .  of course, we can always get lucky. . .  . "

"Antisemitism among friends: It's not acceptable to let it slide"

MEK

The MEK is a private army used by the CIA and the Mossad to fight a covert terrorist war against Iran.  Its position on the American official list of terrorist organizations was an annoyance to MEK leaders, but has had no effect on the MEK's ability to commit violence against innocent Iranians.

The Official Story accepted by both Right and Left in Washington is that the MEK was able to buy its way off the list by hiring expensive lobbyists.  Expensive lobbyists were indeed hired, a collection of the vilest players hanging around American politics.  How do you think the poor MEK managed to pay these many millions of dollars?  No doubt money from the CIA and/or State Department. 

The Official Story of expensive lobbyists was a ruse, a cover story to make the decision seem to fit within the parameters of acceptable Washington graft.  The attacks on Iran are part of a War For The Jews (there is no possible American interest in pretending to stop a weapons program the Americans know doesn't exist, and a close reading of Obama's utterly mendacious UN speech makes it clear that he will do everything required to stop a program which everybody in the room knew was a Jewish fantasy that won't ever need to be stopped:  ". . . the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon").  The Jewish Billionaires have agreed to allow Obama to deal with Iran the way he wants, without a full-fledged War For The Jews, but he has to keep up the covert attacks and the Sanctions For The Jews (which, I repeat, are leading to steps taken by the rest of the world which are actually going to wreck - utterly destroy - the American economic system).  This understanding has allowed Obama to set up an election-friendly distance between him and Bibi so Bibi can continue to distract from the Palestinians (hardly necessary as the predictable collaborator-in-chief has once again taken the money and sold out his people).  As crazy as Bibi seems, his Romney-friendly moves may actually be intended to help Obama.

Making more of a joke of the American list of terrorist organizations for the purposes of facilitating a covert attack on Iranian citizens which is no more than an annoyance to the Iranian government is just part of the theater that  has to play out in Washington so Obama can continue to enjoy the support of the Jewish Billionaires while avoiding actually starting what he  knows would be the final war of the dying American Empire.  It is still possible, of course, that Obama is playing a trick on the Jewish Billionaires, and will settle up with Iran as soon as he no longer needs Jewish Billionaire money.

The biggest joke of all is that the MEK hates the American government only slightly less than it hates the Iranian government, and will doubtless start attacking Americans again as soon as it is convenient.

November surprise?

"What Might Netanyahu Do if Romney’s Defeat Becomes Inevitable?":

"So to my headline question: What might Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu do when his American sponsors tell him, possibly in the coming few days, that Romney isn’t going to win?

In my view the question is worth asking because Netanyahu already knows there is no way the America of a second-term Obama is going to become engaged in a war with Iran. Netanyahu may also know that though they are now on hold until after the American election, secret talks between the Obama administration through a third party and Iran have made significant progress. According to my source with access to these talks, the clear implication is that early in his second term Obama will bring the nuclear crisis with Iran to an end by politics and diplomacy.

  "Iran makes a move, oil slides":

"A more likely reason for the price move than these Saudi Jedi mind games is now emerging. On Tuesday, Catherine Ashton, lead negotiator for the the 5+1 (the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council plus Germany) involved in talks with Iran over its nuclear policy, met Iran's Foreign Minister Saeed Jalili for "informal" discussions, which were said to be constructive, and in respect of which Lady Ashton will be reporting to her colleagues next week in New York.

What was not widely reported was firstly, the short notice of this meeting, and secondly, the fact - very significant in diplomatic terms - that for the most part it took place in the Iranian consulate, which is legally Iranian territory.

In my view, the policy deadlock in Iran has now been broken, and a pragmatic decision has been made to make nuclear concessions."

Note the implication that there is a massive tax payed by everybody, one which falls disproportionately on the poor and one Europe thinks it can no longer afford, caused by the Sanctions For The Jews. It is a very expensive luxury having Jews tell your government what to do.

Going too far

"Bibi's Blunder"  Pernicious, mendacious nonsense.  Note how he conflates the Lobby with Jewish voting patterns.

"Obama Has More Hollywood Fundraising Events Planned for Fall"  'Hollywood' is the standard euphemism.

Meanwhile, the Sanctions For The Jews - you know, the ones that are creating an entirely new financial world order, one that will no longer allow Americans to print dollars at will without severe inflationary consequences - carry on, undisturbed:  "Iran finds ways around sanctions targeting oil sales"

Americans are willing to live as Jewslaves as long as nobody embarrasses them over it.  Bibi stepped over the line by rubbing their noses in it - bossing around the President of the United States! - which has lead to a slight widening of the scope of permitted truth-telling in an odd kind of glasnost:  "Neocons Slither Back"  But mind yourself:  "Happy New Year, Puppet Masters"  "Maureen Dowd accused of anti-Semitism"

Meanwhile, Iran has nothing to do with it:  "Binyamin Netanyahu's Iran strategy erases the Palestinian problem"

"Why we should welcome Mitt Romney’s Middle East straight talk"  Two parties, one policy.

"An Offer I Could Refuse"  Fake horns are hardly necessary for a man responsible for the deaths of over a million people, and counting (if he gets his way on Iran)

"What they talk about in Boca Raton"  Corn, who should know, picks his spot.

"What if Romney were Jewish?" As long as American campaign financing laws are as fucked as they are, there is really no need for a Jewish candidate.

"Who are the real players behind anti-Muslim film? - updated 9/18"  It was Sadek who really started this  "Pro-Israel Copt’s Phone Call Provoked Anti-American Outrage"

"German Ritual-Circumcision Ruling Ignites Feud"  You would think that the torture and mutilation of infants would be a human rights issue.  The old terror of being labeled an 'anti-Semite' is loosening due to the ongoing cumulative sins of the Jews, thus allowing natural human sentiments to emerge from beneath the fear.

"Holocaust Amnesia"

"UK Student Charged For 'Grossly Offensive' Facebook Post"

The Coptic give-away

"Whose Innocence?: Thoughts on Copts, Muslims, and a World Gone (Temporally) Mad" by Anthony Shenoda"

"When I first watched the "film," or the trailer, or whatever it is, I had little doubt that Copts, or someone quite familiar with Coptic historical meta-narratives, were behind it. Many of the slanderous comments against Islam and the Prophet Muhammad in the film are made by all manner of right-wing Christians and Jews, but the Coptic give-away in that 13 minute clip was the bit about the Egyptians believing in one god some five thousand years ago. This is a typical modern move on the part of many Copts and the nineteenth century Orientalist scholarship of things Coptic from which these narratives have frequently drawn authority. If, once upon a time, Egyptian Christians were engaged in the destruction of a pagan Egypt, now they are concerned to show how Christianity in Egypt was the natural evolution of an Egyptian religiosity that already hinted at a triune godhead, resurrection of the dead, and eternal life. This largely has to do with a desire on the part of many Copts to secure their national and Egyptian territorial belonging. Other scenes in the available clip also supported my thinking that Copts might be involved: The scene in which the doctor is educating his daughters (?) on the ways of Muslims shows an image of Jesus that is extremely popular among Copts, an image that I have not seen popularly among other Christians. And the Syrian monk, Bahaira, who makes a later appearance, is an indication that whoever made this “film” 1) has a pretty good sense of contemporary Coptic monastic garb and 2) is aware of the very commonly held view among Copts (but also the Ethiopian Orthodox Christians that I have met) that the Quran was written by a (fallen) Christian monk. People who are aware of Islamic history know that Muhammad had met a Syrian monk called Bahaira. Many Copts hold that this monk is the “true” author of the Quran."

The Mossad-did-it theories are worse than useless. There is absolutely no evidence that the Mossad was involved. The Mossad thesis is connected to the idea that the Muslim unrest is supposed to hurt Obama's reelection. On the contrary, Obama will be able to have all the electoral advantages of having a war - Americans love wars, and love to vote for Presidents waging them - without actually having to wage a war. He just needs to drone kill some Libyans and then announce he's killed more American enemies, just like he killed Osama. Instant hero. Of course, once that happens the usual suspects will announce that this proves that the Mossad was behind the film, as they were really trying to help Obama get reelected!

"Producer Of Anti-Islam Film Was Fed Snitch"

"In remarks stressing that the U.S. government had “absolutely nothing to do with” the anti-Islam film that has touched off violence in the Middle East, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton yesterday sought to quash Arab concerns that the “disgusting and reprehensible” movie was somehow produced or condoned by American officials.

However, Clinton’s attempt to distance the U.S. from “Innocence of Muslims”--and, by extension, its felonious producer--may be complicated by the revelation that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula became a government informant after his 2009 arrest for bank fraud, The Smoking Gun has learned."

and

"In return for Nakoula’s cooperation, prosecutors provided Snyder with a letter noting that his substantial assistance to authorities warranted a sentence reduction.
Along with citing the government missive--known as a 5K1 letter--Henderson told Snyder that Nakoula’s kin would suffer financially during his imprisonment since he was he family’s sole breadwinner. Henderson also reported that Nakoula suffered from various maladies, including Hepatitis C, a “serious diabetes problem,” and “prostate issues” for which he had undergone surgery. “He is on ten medications at this point,” added Henderson.
Nakoula’s involvement in the fraud, Henderson stated, was caused by his need to support his family, including his elderly father. “At the time he did this, he was out of work in the gas station industry, which is what he's really familiar in this country,” said Henderson, adding, “and he was working swap meets for a few dollars every weekend trying to support his family.”
Snyder eventually ordered Nakoula to serve 21 months in prison to be followed by six months in a federal halfway house. The sentence was about a year less than the punishment sought in separate submissions by probation officials and federal prosecutors."

What would this gas station operator, beholden to the American government, know about producing a movie?

Cooperation

It was a:

1.  full-fledged military attack, 
2. long in the planning (no spontaneous demonstration, although the demonstration helped disguise the attack, and perhaps fooled the Americans into underestimating the situation), 
3. by a paramilitary group associated with the government just installed by NATO/American violence (not to mention closely associated with the fighters against the Syrian government being sponsored by the American government), although they have done a better-than-usual job at hiding the connections,
4. and with the assistance of at least some of the Libyan government security service, who helped deliver the Ambassador into the hands of the attackers, where he appears to have received some very rough justice, but justice nonetheless (I wonder if it included the special treatment given to Gadaffi), 
5. and the response is yet more American violence, pretending to send drones and troops to Libya which are already there and haven't stopped operating,
6. all for the purpose of drone-slaughtering some al-Qaeda leader so Obama can appear to be strong and manly and re-electable,
7. which is highly ironic given that the original cause of the attack was the drone-slaughtering in Afghanistan of an al-Qaeda leader from Libya.

Meanwhile, the infamous movie - if it exists -  that has sparked protests elsewhere appears to have been produced by a man named Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, who pleaded guilty to felony bank fraud:

"A variety of documents filed in the U.S. District Court case were sealed at the request of prosecutors and Nakoula’s lawyer. The sealed records--from the transcript of Nakoula’s change-of-plea hearing to sentencing memoranda--appear to indicate that his plea agreement with the government included some form of cooperation."

As soon as he was released he started to work on the movie.  It may be he is just a con man who took a sizable amount to make a movie and just produced a cheap trailer.  Was this part of his 'cooperation'?  Who is really behind the movie?  Who financed it?

Cryptic Coptic

Why would a Coptic Christian make a movie which is guaranteed to get fellow Coptic Christians in Egypt killed?  Once this gets back to Egypt, there will be violent retaliation.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

"Cargill and Others Behind anti-Organic "Stanford Study""  It is funny how when we see the term 'scientific study' our brains freeze and we accept everything as gospel truth.

"We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say"  If the middle class was allowed to happen because the plutocrats feared commie revolution, and they've now decided they didn't really need a middle class after all as the masses are too exhausted/brainwashed/co-opted to do anything about their plight, we're left with revolutions by groups who are literally starving to death (another reason why Obama is better than Romney for the plutocrats).

A few months ago the right-wingers were all crowing about how Hugo Chavez was sure to be defeated in the upcoming election.  Not so much now.  The Americans have resorted to alternative methods of campaigning:  "The Sabotage Theory of the Explosion in Venezuela’s Amuay Refinery" and "Venezuela’s Oil Refinery Blaze: Seven Good Reasons to Suspect Sabotage".

"Is Facebook’s Ad Model a Scam?"  Zuckerberg's bots?

"Washington’s Double-Dip Scam and War with Iran"

"Trouble in Timbuktu"  "Crimes Against Civilization in the Hejaz"  The consequences of the NATO attack on Libya (itself in a civil war, though you would never know it from the Western media).

"A friendly Turanic people"  "Anti-Semitic Hungarian Lawmaker Shocked to Learn His Grandparents Are Jewish Holocaust Survivors"  Pledges an expiating visit to Auschwitz!

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Nationalization!:  "Behind Bolivia’s nationalization of Canadian mine"

Jubilees!: "Private Debt Kills the Economy"

Racial supremacism!:  "Israeli author to warn Ottawa Jews against apathy"  Note that the arguments made for Israel by this respected fine upstanding Rabbi are exactly the same - exactly! - as those made by racist hillbilly Southern white supremacists.

Voting!:  "What Voting Can Look Like"  With the big proviso at the end that Quebec recently suffered one of the biggest vote fraud scandals in the history of North America, an outrage for which nobody was punished (vote fraud, wherever it occurs, seems to be a crime without punishment).

Extradition (of people not named Julian)!:  "Bolivia: Evo Morales denounces the United States as a "paradise of impunity" and "refuge for criminals" after Washington refuses to extradite Goni"

Lawlessness!:  "“Code is law” Once More"

Meritlessness!:  "Tyranny of Merit"  Back in the day, when you got something because of your family connections, at least you didn't think you were all that for getting it.  "World's richest woman says those who are jealous of her wealth should 'stop drinking, stop smoking and work harder'"

Capitalism!:  ABOLISH RESTAURANTS

Sunday, September 9, 2012

"Climate Change Will Starve the Poor Even More Than Previously Thought"

"Maldives are rubbish" (via The Sideshow)

"5 Countries the U.S. Is Royally Screwing Over" by Alex Kane"  The sheer volume of appalling American behavior actually helps hide some of it as there is too much to keep up with.

There's no app for that:  "Apple Says No Thanks to App that Tracks Deaths from U.S. Drones"

The better to receive marching orders:  "NYPD Opens Branch in Israel"  "NYPD: Muslim Spying Led To No Leads, Terror Cases"  "In leaked e-mail exchange, FBI official says NYPD intelligence activities are ‘felonious’"

The hold the Jews have over the American government is so insane that many people have trouble comprehending how it can even be possible.  Why would an utterly powerful nation completely wreck itself - and, sadly, that is what we are talking about here - at the instance of a pipsqueak country?  There is only one historical precedent:  "Israel: America = Serbia: Czarist Russia?"

When the Democratic Platform Vote was being videoed, the director had the camera directed at people clearly identified as 'Arab American' (with a sign, for those Americans who can read!) as if it was this minority of 'Islamofascists' who opposed the platform.  Actually, it was clearly voted down by the majority of the delegates.  Note the subtleties, and ubiquity, of the media control of our perceptions. I have a little less trouble with the teleprompter, as, well, that's how teleprompters work.

"Scientology Leader David Miscavige's Disappeared Wife Shelly: What We Know"

"Cops Shooting People"

Slouching towards Jerusalem: a conspiracy

"Why did Jerusalem reference disappear from the Democratic Party platform?"

AIPAC was consulted when the original platform was drafted (amazing, it itself, when you think about it), but made no complaint.

Then the shit hit the fan, and Obama was forced to endorse the Likudnik position, as planned.

"Chaos During Dems Platform Vote"  Note how desperate the Democrats were to have this passed.  They clearly did not get the support of half the delegates, let alone two-thirds!

"All this talk of war is bullshit"

"Analysis: Chastised Israel seeks way forward with U.S. over Iran":

""All this talk of war is bullshit. If they could do it, then they would have already done it long ago," a senior European diplomat in Israel said."

In case the truth is too bracing, here's the opposite of the truth, the purest bullshit possible: "Answers to All Your Questions About Iran, Israel, Bibi and Obama!"

In some places there is weeping

"Democratic platform: The tide of war is receding":

"The 2012 Democratic National Platform, released Monday night ahead of the Democratic National Convention, argues that the United States is on the rise in terms of power and influence around the world due to President Barack Obama's foreign policy and that the decade of war that followed 9/11 is now coming to a close."

I'm sure this isn't actually true, but it sends a message that the United States isn't just an unlimited fountain of free organized violence a certain group can call on whenever its own failings require another war.

It is hilarious that the Democrats say that al-Qaeda is 'on the path to defeat' (p 56 of the pdf), while the CIA, under Barry's express orders, is simultaneously funding and arming it against the people of Syria.

Various hilarious

Various hilarious:

1. "Humvee accidents cause of one-third of military fatalities, Hopkins analysis finds"  Solution?:  driving lessons and fewer drugs.
2. "Rabbi Yoshiyahu Yosef Pinto's Porn Connection"
3. "Two Cheers for Clint Eastwood"  Old-fashioned Republicans don't have much use for either party.  Read the two links of shared policies (everything that is important).
4. "DAVE BARRY: My all-purpose Republican National Convention speech"
5. "Why Does Canada Have a Strategic Maple Syrup Reserve?"

Funny thing to say

"Biden says Romney ready for war with Syria, Iran"  Isn't that a funny thing to say if Obama has any intention whatsoever - either now or after the election - of escalating the Wars For The Jews against Syria and Iran?

"Obama Denies Deal With Iran: Won’t Back Israeli Strike if Iran Steers Clear of US Assets in Persian Gulf" (who writes these incompetent contradictory headlines?).  The secret message is startling:  the United States will look after its national interests rather than those of the Jews!!!

Just say 'NO!"

"Why Americans Must End America’s Self-Generating Wars" by Peter Dale Scott.  Lots of facts, but essentially nonsense, as it fails even once to mention the real underlying problem, a common fault of 'progressives' who don't want to be slurred.  People like Scott have to realize that it is the delicacy that is the root cause of the fact that the necessary change in American politics is impossible.

Any hope comes, not from 'progressives', but from the paleocons:  "Did America Say NO to Israel?"  This is also a message to Bibi from Barry for Bibi to stop messing with Barry's reelection by continuing to spout off about Iran.  It is no doubt a message, as the original announcement of the exercises was made with such fanfare and expressly directed at Iran.

"Israeli Official: Obama ‘Will Make Netanyahu Pay’ If Reelected"  Barry could send a clear message by failing to interfere with this month's Palestinian efforts at the UN.

"J'lem puzzled by Dempsey comment on Iran strike":

"A senior government official on Saturday characterized as “strange” a recent statement by US military chief Gen. Martin Dempsey that he would not want to be “complicit” in an Israeli attack on Iran.
“Dempsey’s comments are strange in that they would seem to contradict the continual statements from the White House that the security and defense cooperation between Israel and the US has never been as close,” the senior official said."

Pure comedy gold.

"Dempsey: ‘I Don’t Want to Be Complicit’ in Israeli Strike on Iran"

The concentration camp guard has a sad (and aching fangs), not to mention a real talent for writing a completely misleading headline:  "Was Gen. Dempsey Goading Israel to Attack Iran?"  And yes, 'complicit' is the word you use when discussing war crimes, which is indeed what we are discussing when we contemplate a Zionist attack on Iran.

"What about Israel’s nuclear weapons?" by Patrick B. Pexton (who will probably die in a mysterious boating accident):

"Among the less benign reasons U.S. sources don’t leak is that it can hurt your career. Said Perkovich: “It’s like all things having to do with Israel and the United States. If you want to get ahead, you don’t talk about it; you don’t criticize Israel, you protect Israel. You don’t talk about illegal settlements on the West Bank even though everyone knows they are there.” "

"Hungarian government stops payments to needy Holocaust survivors; demands return of funds"