- "New York Times Puts Launch Point of Chem Weapons Rockets Inside Rebel Contested Area";
- "INSIGHT - military intervention in Syria, post withdrawal status of forces" ("They dont believe air intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a massacre, like the Ghadafi move against Benghazi. They think the US would have a high tolerance for killings as long as it doesn't reach that very public stage."); and
- "Britain’s Daily Mail: U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria”" ("It is our understanding that the Daily Mail report was removed following a libel suit launched by Britam Defense and Intelligence against the Daily Mail") and "Deleted Daily Mail Online Article: “US Backed Plan for Chemical Weapon Attack in Syria to Be Blamed on Assad”"
After the WaPost’s Latest Shot, It’s Time to Call ‘Fake News’ By Its Real Name ‘Weaponized Journalism’ - By Claire Bernish | The Free Thought Project | January 16, 2017 Defying any sense of journalistic integrity and loyalty to the truth, the Washington Post d...
8 minutes ago