Saturday, February 13, 2016


"Will D.C. Madam’s Infamous “Little Black Book” Emerge?"

"The Kissinger friendship: Clinton called ‘Henry’ to intercede with ‘Bibi’"  "The Clintons Earned Over $3.5 Million in Paid Addresses to Pro-Israel Organizations"  "Lightning Rod Pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC Is Mostly Backed by Jewish Donors"  "Zio-whore Hillary & Her Seven Sleazy Zionist Top Campaign Donors"

"Why Are The Neocons so Desperate to Rescue Al-Qaeda in Syria?"

"Should Argentina Now Pay the Ransom to Its Hostage-Takers?"

"Litvinenko and the Demise of British Justice" (footnotes removed):
"Before he died, however, Litvinenko did nominate his killer and I am not referring to the manifestly false allegation referred to above. The man he pointed to was Mario Scaramella, a convicted felon who also happened to be an expert in nuclear waste.
Litvinenko had lunch with Scaramella at a sushi bar before his evening meeting with Lugovoi and Kovtun at the Pine Bar. Scaramella apparently did not eat or drink anything at that lunch, but he did require hospital treatment shortly thereafter for a mild case of polonium poisoning.
Disregarding the wildly improbable, the logical possibilities therefore seem to be:

  • Litvinenko was himself carrying the plutonium, which was shown to Scaramella thereby causing Scaramella’s later symptoms.  This does not explain why Litvinenko would ingest the substance voluntarily.  Recall also Litvinenko pointing the finger at Scaramella as the source of his illness and there seems no other plausible explanation for that accusation.
  • Litvinenko was already infected when he met Scaramella.  This would be consistent with the twin “spikes” of polonium poisoning said to have been found in Litvinenko’s body.
  • Litvinenko deliberately ingested the polonium himself.  This seems the least likely hypothesis.
  • Litvinenko was known to be trading in nuclear materials (but ignored by the media) accidentally poisoned himself.  This was the hypothesis most favoured by Epstein in his 2008 article and it still best fits the known facts.
  • Scaramella poisoned Litvinenko at some stage through the course of the sushi lunch (which he himself did not partake of).  Scaramella’s abstinence from food or drink is odd to say the least.
This is not to accuse Scaramella of doing the deed, but it is a logical possibility that the Judge did not seem to consider despite the supporting evidence, including Scaramella’s own illness that is otherwise difficult to explain."
blog comments powered by Disqus