Sunday, October 09, 2016

Blood lust

"A Real Life "House of Cards" - The Most Striking WikiLeaks Revelations From The "Podesta Files"".

"Podesta Emails Reveal Illegal Coordination With David Brock Super PAC".

"Emails show Clinton crafted BDS letter for pro-Israel donors, as counter to her support for Iran deal".

"Billy Bush Says He’s Ashamed by Lewd Talk With Donald Trump":
"The tape of Mr. Bush and Mr. Trump published on Friday was unearthed this week by “Access Hollywood” producers, who were reviewing archives for past interviews with Mr. Trump. NBC News, a corporate cousin of “Access Hollywood,” also became aware of the tape, and both news outlets began to prepare stories.

But The Washington Post also obtained a copy."
Notice how vague this is ('also became aware' and 'also obtained a copy' as if it fell from the sky into the claws of the (((media)))). It is a small world when a member of the Bush Royal Family can help out a member of the Clinton Royal Family.  I'd be very surprised if Bush didn't tell somebody that he had some excellent material to hide the upcoming really serious revelations about Clinton, and the (((media))) conspiracy went looking for it.  The lockstep retraction of endorsements by Republicans is also part of the conspiracy.  We'll see if this obvious (((media))) manipulation causes a reaction from voters similar to many recent elections and referenda.

Tweet (WikiLeaks):
"@johnpodesta Submit to WikiLeaks another copy of all your emails. We'll compare the two identical archives for you."

Tweet (WikiLeaks):
"Robby Mook: "it's a little troubling" that meeting of Clinton Foundation was held at Goldman Sachs HQ …"

"Liz Sly and various Western propaganda on Aleppo: so how many hospitals are there in East Aleppo? Let us do a count".

"Kerry’s sorrows are unspeakable".

"A Desperate Obama Administration Resorts To Lying And Maybe More".  But Barry's precious shekels?

"Who’s Calling, Whose Bluff In Syria? Moscow, Washington and the Art of Deception" by  Andrew Korybko.  On the diplomatic nuances of the difference between protecting Russian troops and protecting Syrian territorial integrity.  The good thing is that protecting Syrian territorial integrity is necessary for Russia to block the existential threat of terrorist attacks against Russian territory (remember an explicit threat of this specific kind of attack has been made by the US State Department, emphasizing the fact that 'terrorists' are all just part of a large American proxy army that can be deployed anywhere).

"Confused about Syria, other wars? Remove all confusion/propaganda by knowing War Law: US/UK/Israel armed attacks are illegal unless under attack by another nation’s government. Demand US/UK/Israel .01% arrests, or suffer Wars of Aggression forever".  Funny how American Exceptionalists never consider that any American action in Syria is utterly illegal.

"Afghanistan---Fool's War" (Margolis).

"Syria: American Un-exceptionalism Laid Bare":
"Like the terrorist that sends an anonymous threat, the US current psyop against the Syrian anti-terrorism campaign has utilized anonymous sources to report that Washington is considering “limited” attacks on Syrian and Russian forces to encourage them to break off their driving the Western backed terrorists out of Aleppo. You just can’t make this stuff up.

Because such attacks would be an illegal without a UN resolution, something impossible with Russian and Chinese vetoes, that speed bump would be overcome by using “covert” airstrikes. A quick VeteransToday survey of retired Intel pros showed a consensus that this was one of the dumbest ideas by a US government since the Bush(43) gangsters went into Iraq to get Saddam’s nukes and chemical weapons, which he did not have.

The Pentagon-CIA pitch was that such strikes would drive Assad to the negotiation table. We call this the language of lunatics, who want to start a war because they feel impervious to being labeled the wanton aggressor. They are lunatic supremacists, a term I just invented.

We have been watching the war of words built up to these overt threats over the past two weeks. The US ended all pretense of seeking a Syrian war resolution by announcing it would discontinue joint efforts with Russia in Geneva. To embarrass the country even more, US officials once again attempted to blame the failure on Russia by claiming it was violating the ceasefire with its bombing missions to support ending the terror siege in East Aleppo.

These officials ignored the simple fact that the ceasefire expired after the first week, so the Syrian coalition could not have broken it by acts taken afterwards. I would not have used the harsh term un-exceptionalism if the ceasefire had simply failed. It did not. It was strangled by those that wanted to kill it – by the Jihadis, their Gulf State supporters, the Pentagon, and how much by Obama and Kerry we can’t be sure at this point.

When Obama did not ask for someone’s head from the Pentagon for the Deir Ezzor bombing of the Syrian troops there, he effectively put his seal of approval on the act, adding another unexceptional stain to his record. He allowed his administration to instantly blame the Syrian coalition for the nighttime attack on the aid convoy on the testimony only of the pro-insurgent White Hat relief group, when his own Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff told Congress that he had no evidence of Russian involvement.

General Dunford lied by omission because he knew that the Syrian Airforce was not equipped for night strikes, and that, with the US total battlefield surveillance, he knew exactly where every Russian plane flew, and would have shared the radar plot of alleged Russian involvement, which he did not. That again was very unexceptional.

John Kerry did not miss getting on this bandwagon either. He made the mistake of having a frank talk with an insurgent group on the sidelines of the UN conference in New York, where it was taped.

“We don’t have a basis (to intervene), our lawyers tell us, unless we have a UN Security Council Resolution which the Russians can veto or unless we are under attack from folks or unless we are invited in. Russia is invited in by the legitimate regime,” said Kerry. Oops!"
"Why Palestinians are not obligated to vote for Hillary Clinton".

"Needed Now: a Peace Movement Against the Clinton Wars to Come".  Hopeless.  The blood frenzy of the (((media))) for WWIII after her inauguration will be unstoppable.  All you need to know is that WWIII is thought to be 'good for the Jews'.

"Key Neocon Calls on US to Oust Putin".  (((Carl Gershman))).  We're witnessing a panicked frenzy of blood lust by the (((Traditional Enemies Of Peace))).

"What should Tony Blair name his new political party? [POLL]"
blog comments powered by Disqus