Sunday, April 29, 2018

No one really knows

Standard (((media))) operating procedure:  "Western Press Descend into Insanity as Syria Narrative Collapses" (Kit):
"Yesterday the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) confirmed what many of us had already deduced – there were no chemical weapons present at the sites targeted by the US/UK/French missiles.

That’s not been reported in the Western press, at all. Exemplified by the eternally on-message Guardian, who haven’t had a headline regarding Syria in over a week. The Royal Baby and ABBA’s new song and a stuffed anteater, all apparently too important to be bumped from the front page."
"The west closes its ears to Douma testimony" (Cook):
"The first strange thing to note is that the US, UK and France boycotted the meeting, denouncing Russia for producing the witnesses and calling the event an “obscene masquerade” and “theatre”. It suggests that this trio, behaving like the proverbial three monkeys, think the testimony will disappear if they simply ignore it. They have no interest in hearing from witnesses unless they confirm the western narrative used to justify the air strikes on Syria.

Testimony from witnesses is surely a crucial part of determining what actually happened. The US, UK and France are surely obligated to listen to the witnesses first, and then seek to discredit the testimony afterwards if they think it implausible or coerced. The evidence cannot be tested and rebutted if it is not even considered.

The second is that the media are echoing this misplaced scorn for evidence. They too seem to have prejudged whether the witnesses are credible before listening to what they have to say (similar to their treatment of Fisk). Tellingly, the Guardian described these witnesses as “supposed witnesses”, not a formulation that suggests any degree of impartiality in its coverage.

Notice that when the Guardian refers to witnesses who support the UK-UK-French line, often those living under the rule of violent jihadist groups, the paper does not designate them “supposed witnesses” or assume their testimony is coerced. Why for the Guardian are some witnesses only professing to be witnesses, while others really are witnesses? The answer appears to depend on whether the testimony accords with the official western narrative. There is a word for that, and it is not “journalism”."
Mackey can be all over the place in quality, but he is usually one of the most embarrassing 'journalists' working:  "Twitterati challenge journalist who bemoaned Douma testimony as ‘bizarre & underwhelming’".

"Ignore, deny, downplay: Accounts of Syrians from Douma have no place in Western narrative".  All 'journalist' hands are on deck in this code-red emergency, an illegal attack based on conclusively proven lies.  What the hell are we going to do to start wars once the false-flag concept becomes the standard normie understanding?

Macron's big swinging dick had ED:  "France Had Some Big Problems Firing Missiles at Syria". "Syrie : après les ratés de l'armée française, "il y a une crise de crédibilité"".  Macrons's 90-year-old wife says:  'don't worry baby, it can happen to anyone'.

"The Silence Of The Skripals - Government Blocks Press Reports - Media Change The Record" (Moon).  A D-notice, a perfect silencer, as it is illegal to mention its very existence, might explain some oddities in the coverage, and is certainly evidence of guilt by the British government.  If it is just to protect Miller's status as an under-cover operator, which would be an understandable 'national security' request, it is a little late!

It is still unclear - perhaps intentionally so - but it appears the California police may have not been acting on a specific tip, but just threw their EAR-ONS DNA evidence into the privately-held database, looking for hits or familial hits, and then compared last names to their own list of possible suspects.  When they got a possible familial match, they then dumpster dove his beer cans until they got a DNA sample which conclusively matched.  Really good police work, but why didn't they do it sooner?  A possible answer is that until recently there just wasn't a big enough database to cover enough of the population using familial matches.  To me it seems a lot more of an invasion if they do this kind of mass search, rather than using the database to confirm an individual tip, though both raise big privacy issues which won't be addressed as the authoritarians so love to catch the 'bad guys'.  See:  "Cops hunting the Golden State Killer got the WRONG MAN by using a free genealogy site and ordered innocent sickly 73-year-old to give DNA to clear himself - then his daughter helped nail 'real killer'" (GEDmatch is a sort of social media site where you can share your DNA results from DNA testing sites, with a view, I guess, to find relatives you didn't know you had):
"To track down DeAngelo, investigators used GEDmatch, which has around a million users and is based in Florida.

The site, a no strings attached operation which has never advertised, allows users who have obtained DNA profiles from companies such as Ancestry.com to upload them to expand their search for relatives.

Investigators uploaded the crime scene DNA profile to GEDmatch using a fake profile and pseudonym. They then found a distant relative of DeAngelo before narrowing this down to the grandfather himself, reported CBS.

It is unclear exactly how cops managed to do this but it was most likely through traditional detective methods. 

Paul Holes, the lead investigator on the case, said his team did not need a court order to do this and was making use of information people had chosen to share publicly.

GEDmatch insisted it was not aware its database had been used during the investigation and said it does not 'hand out data'."
If you look at him in court, DeAngelo seems to be pulling a 'billcosby' (how could that decrepit old man have done all those horrible things?).  Some serial killers display considerable charm, and are almost likeable, but EAR-ONS was a total asshole throughout.

Joy Reid's admission/confession, after her insane hacking conspiracy theory falls apart, is described as 'powerful'!!!: "Joy Reid Offers A Heart-Felt Apology To LGBT Community" (Madrak).  These scoundrels are all in the same virtue-signaling identity politics grift where they take money from the 1% to pass off words (and even pronouns) in lieu of concrete material benefits, so they have to stick together.  "I'm not getting into the details of what Joy Reid allegedly did, because no one really knows"!!!  Some of the commenters grasp the levels of bullshit flying here.  One thing that nobody is permitted to notice is that Reid's father is African and her mother British Guyanese, and her opinions, while totally out of line with White - well, Jewish - Official Thinking, are very much in line with normal views from, say, the Caribbean.  It is a shame she can't say that out loud.  "Joy Reid will stay on air at MSNBC amid outcry over alleged anti-gay posts".

I never knew Merton was assassinated, but you can see why they would want to shut him up:  "Speaking the Unspeakable: The Assassination and Martyrdom of Thomas Merton" (Curtin):
"Merton died on the afternoon of December 10, 1968 when those sinister special interests snuck up on him. He had just given a talk, had lunch, and returned to his cottage shortly before 2 P.M., accompanied by Fr. Francois de Grunne, O.S.B. (Order of Saint Benedict) from Belgium, who shared the cottage with Merton and two others, Fr. Celestine Say, O.S.B. from the Philippines, whose room was across from Merton’s on the first floor, and John Moffit, a journalist editor whose room was directly over Merton’s on the second floor adjacent to de Grunne’s.

The walk from the dining hall to the cottage took 10-15 minutes. Say and Moffit were walking a good distance behind Merton and de Grunne and arrived at the cottage about 5-7 minutes after them. When they entered the unlocked building, they did not see Merton and de Grunne and presumed they had gone to their respective rooms.

Shortly after de Grunne and Merton entered the cottage, Merton was killed. The actions of de Grunne, a mysterious figure who, according to the authors, “seems to have fallen off the face of the earth” and whose “abbey will not even respond to our questions about him,” clearly make him a prime suspect in the crime. His actions and story are not believable and are contradicted by the most reliable witness, Fr. Say, whose statements have been absolutely consistent.

Beyond speculation, however, are the facts gathered by the authors that clearly prove that from the start there was a concerted effort to make a crime look like an accident.

These efforts were initiated by de Grunne, who was the first to call it an “accident,” but ably assisted by many others, including the Thai police or their surrogates, whose police report was released by the U.S. Embassy seven months after Merton’s death and has no title, author, date, photographs, laboratory reports, or investigators’ memos, and omits the testimony of the first two witnesses on the scene, Fr. Say and Fr. Egbert Donovan, who viewed Merton lying in a position and dressed in shorts totally inconsistent with the accidental death scenario."
"The JFK Cover-Up Continues" (Hornberger).  Trump punts.  It is funny that Trump is similarly regarded by the IC as a threat to 'national security'.

No need for new documents, an examination of the autopsy:  "JFK Assassination: The Tell-Tale Brain" (Cranor).

"EXCLUSIVE: Cabal Of Wealthy Donors Financing $50 Million Trump-Russia Investigation" (Ross).  Using Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS!

Yes, jumping with both feet right into the 'dialectic'!: "Chomsky Among “Progressives” Calling for US Military Involvement in Syria " (Webb).  'Progressives' for Yinon!  You just have to laugh!

"Are Jews Turning Against the SPLC?" (Sol) (the 'dialectic' meets 'friendly fire'):
"Ok, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what’s going on with Tablet mag’s criticisms here.

Basically, the SPLC has gone off the reservation. They forgot their mission and just started randomly enforcing SJW ethics on society, with no thought of how it affected the Jews and their agenda.

In other words, the SPLC’s current behavior pattern is no longer good for the Jews

Presumably, the Jews expect that the SPLC will get this message and correct course. I’m not sure this is possible anymore, though. These organizations all had to hire brown people and SJW millenials, who are “true believers” in these stupid ideas.  So I’m not at all certain that this kind of human material could be disciplined to serve the Jews efficiently.

There’s a good chance that this conflict could end with the SPLC losing a lot of its funding and media support. Good."
You know, goyim, we 'progressives' - 'fellow white people' - need to fight against American militarism and violent colonialism, but Assad isn't quite right for the job, so every Syrian needs to be under the rule of head loppers and human organ eaters:  "Syria and Chemical Weapons: Debating the Regime-Change War in Syria" (Annis).

"The Balfour Declaration Was Written by Arthur Balfour" (Stehling).  Shouldn't there be a 'not' in that title?  Added:  after I posted, they've added the 'not'.

"I hereby accuse the Israeli occupation government" (Angry Arab).  When is the Angry Arab going to realize that you won't receive any special advantages for playing by the Khazar rules?  If they are going to censor everybody anyway, why not tell the whole truth?
blog comments powered by Disqus