Thursday, April 18, 2019

Dead ducks

"CIA Director Used Fake Skripal Incident Photos To Manipulate Trump" (Moon).

"Trump in Dumps as Spook Picks Sick Kids’n’Dead Duck Trick Pics" (Slane).

"New York Times Accidentally Unravels UK Government's Official Skripal Narrative" (Klarenberg). [Also from Klarenberg, early (2015) Integrity Initiative plans drawn up for the general attack on Russia, including mass expulsion of diplomats, plans which presumably would have to involve some reason based on alleged activity of Russia which had not yet occurred, and which could not be counted on, unless they made it up themselves, e.g., the attack on the Skripals.]

The Brits might have sent fake pictures to Bloody Gina, but that seems highly unlikely.  More likely is that she saw how fake photos of dead children from Syria tricked him into agreeing to the attack on Syria, and decided to pull the same stunt again.  The Trump White House is out of control.  Various officials see that he is completely out of it, and are taking advantage (God knows what Bolton is telling him!).  If things were working properly Bloody would be fired on the spot, but there is no indication that any semblance of real intelligence is getting through to Trump, so how will he even figure out what is going on?

The other aspect of this is noted in the PS to the Slane piece, the fact that 'journalists' know what is going on but retype the PR without comment (Klarenberg points out similar lying crap from Sky News Foreign Affairs Editor Deborah Haynes):
"PS. An aside. The Independent, which is apparently a publisher of news, has picked up on this storyhere. In their piece, they basically repeat what was said in the New York Times about how Gina Haspel persuaded Mr Trump using the dead ducks and sick children pics. But here’s the thing. Whilst it doesn’t surprise me that writers in the likes of the Washington Post or New York Times might not know too many details regarding the Salisbury case, the Independent knows full well that there were no dead ducks and no sick children. And so since they are writing about it, they must know that either the CIA director or the British Government, or both, knowingly misled the US President. Yet they say nothing about this in their piece. Why? Simply because they are not journalists, but stenographers, and they have no intention of informing their readers of what is true and what is real. I’m not sure how they live with themselves, but somehow they manage."
If Trump is this cognitively impaired now, just wait and see how he'll be at the end of his (now inevitable, given the mess that is the Democrat nomination race) second term.
blog comments powered by Disqus