Monday, September 30, 2019

Worse than I had thought

"The Biden Affair in the Ukraine" (Shamir):
"The subject of the server makes many people in the Clintonite camp extremely nervous. They already marked it with “conspiracy” marker, meaning you may not touch it. In another “conspiracy debunking” item they created a straw man, saying “the notion that there is some missing “server,” and that the server might exist somewhere—like in Ukraine—has no basis in reality. The DNC’s network consisted of many servers and computers”. However, the server Trump asked about is not the DNC server, but the server allegedly used to hack DNC server. It had left some Russian-language traces, and it was presented as a proof of Russian involvement. But Alperovich’s hackers in the Ukraine also use Russian as their working language, and this allowed the Russia-hating Jew an opportunity to create the whole chain of “proofs” of Russian hackers’ activity with fancy names. Recovery of the server would put paid to the whole myth of Russian hacking, and would make the Clintonite case untenable."
Maybe, but I still think it more likely that the server Trump is referring to is the Clinton email server, which somebody has told Trump - perhaps as an excuse for not looking at it - was physically in Ukraine, whether or not that is true.

"For Dems, Ukraine Is Perfect Extension Of Russian Narrative" (Tracey).  I still find it remarkable that the crime Trump is accused of doing - the extraction of 'favors' involving personal, or political, benefit as a quid pro quo to some actual or implied removal of threat of the use of US power against the vassal state - didn't actually happen (whether through luck or because Trump is savvier than he is given credit for), but Biden did that very thing and boasted about it.  The impeachment thing looks more like an attack on Biden's chances as nominee, as the Democrat ((('donors'))) prefer Trump to any possible Democrat.  Democrats are not 'good for the Jews' or for the Zionist Empire right now, despite the kowtowing of Biden and Warren to the worst abuses of Israel, as there is an underlying Khazar skepticism rising in the party due to the sheer outrageousness of the Khazar Evildoing.

I would have said the exact opposite of this, that MbS remains as leader only so long as the King is alive and in place:  "Saudi Arabia - Another Defeat In Yemen - King's Bodyguard Killed" (Moon).  MbS's position - and life, due to the fact he has infuriated many with the kidnappings, torturing and shakedowns  - depends entirely on the respect the very conservative Royals have for the King and the hierarchy itself.

Tweet (Ben Norton) (Graham's tweets are essentially a meter on what the Mega Group has on him and the severity of the threats to release this material):
"After 8 years of a failed criminal proxy war that created ISIS, devastated Syria, and killed hundreds of thousands, neocon Lindsey Graham wants Trump to assassinate Bashar al-Assad (bombing his house like how Reagan bombed Qadhafi's, killing his daughter)"
Along with the most recent Pompeo gas lie, it appears the imminent end of the war in Syria - leaving aside the land Turkey is trying to steal - is causing the 'American' Khazar billionaires to blow a gasket, which fury is reflected in the goofy statements of their bribees/blackmailees.

"Mike Pompeo on the U.S. Victory in Afghanistan" (Leupp).

""Nasr min Allah! Nasr min Allah!" (a victory from God Almighty) Somebody show this to Trump!" (Lang). The Houthis have a sense of PR, releasing this when they think they have MbS on the ropes.

Tweet (Anya Parampil):
"Tho sadly, Iranian Foreign Minister @JZarif cannot visit his friend of 40 years, who is in a hospital a few blocks away from him, due to ABSURD restrictions the US has placed on Zarif‘s movement in NYC The US abuses it’s privilege of hosting the UN to wage war on diplomats"
Way past time to move the UN, as the Assholians can't live up to even the most basic standards of diplomacy or even decency: "It’s Past Time to Move the United Nations to Switzerland " (Madsen).

"Girls, Groupies, and Grim Reapers: The Religious Politics of Mass Response" (Forte).  He didn't need to venture into climate change denial to note that we're being had by another 'little girl' PR stunt, as the goal isn't to hide a scientific scam (denial is no longer working, and is probably backfiring as it is so ridiculous and obvious), but to prevent anything being done about it that might harm the financial interests of the 1%.

Sisi has been taking a somewhat independent foreign policy lately, and we can't have that:  "Egypt is being Targeted Again" (Kulikov).

"Freud, Sexual Abuse, and B'nai B'rith" (Guyénot) (see also:  "The Jonas Salk Polio Vaccine Lie"):
"It could easily be argued that, in matters of psychology, every sensible thing that Freud said had been said before him, and that almost everything he said that hadn’t been said before has been proven wrong.
So why did Freud become so famous? The long answer is that Freud benefitted from the same kind of communication networking that produced many other Jewish intellectual “geniuses”, and made French novelist André Gide comment in 1914 (in his diary) about “this tendency to constantly emphasize the Jew, … this predisposition to recognizing in him talent, even genius”[19] The shorter answer to the question above is: B’nai B’rith. I will not suggest that the B’nai B’rith supported Freud’s Oedipus theory because they saw its potential for the moral corruption of the West. Nor do I suggest that the B’nai B’rith and Freud conspired to ruin Western civilization with the pestilential idea of infantile sexuality. But I do suggest that, had Freud maintained his earlier conviction in the reality of the abuses suffered by his Jewish patients, he would not have received as much support.
To clarify this point, it is appropriate to recall a memorable demonstration of power by the B’nai B’rith, which has an obvious relevance to Freud’s intellectual biography. In 1913, the B’nai B’rith created the Anti-Defamation League to save the life and the reputation of Leo Frank, the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, who was convicted of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old girl working in his pencil factory. The evidence for Frank’s guilt was overwhelming, but tremendous financial resources were deployed for his legal defense—including false testimonies—and an intense publicity was orchestrated in the news media, with the New York Times devoting enormous coverage to the case. I quote from Ron Unz’s article:
“For almost two years, the nearly limitless funds deployed by Frank’s supporters covered the costs of thirteen separate appeals on the state and federal levels, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, while the national media was used to endlessly vilify Georgia’s system of justice in the harshest possible terms. Naturally, this soon generated a local reaction, and during this period outraged Georgians began denouncing the wealthy Jews who were spending such enormous sums to subvert the local criminal justice system. … All appeals were ultimately rejected and Frank’s execution date for the rape and murder of the young girl finally drew near. But just days before he was scheduled to leave office, Georgia’s outgoing governor commuted Frank’s sentence, provoking an enormous storm of popular protest, especially since he was the legal partner of Frank’s chief defense lawyer, an obvious conflict of interest. … A few weeks later, a group of Georgia citizens stormed Frank’s prison farm, abducting and hanging him, with Frank becoming the first and only Jew lynched in American history.”
Thanks to the mobilization of the Jewish power elite—“as one man”—, Leo Frank has been turned from a convicted pedophile and child murderer into a martyr of anti-Semitism. We don’t know what Freud thought of the case, but there is an obvious resonance between his “assault on truth” and the B’nai B’rith’s. If young Mary Phagan had visited a Freudian psychoanalyst before her atrocious death, and complained of her boss’ sexual overtures, she probably would have been told about her own “penis envy”; had she protested, she would have been told that her protest proved her sexual repression—exactly as happened to Freud’s patient Dora, Ida Bauer by her real name, an eighteen-year-old girl suffering from hysterical symptoms.[20]"
"In The Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud describes “religion”—meaning essentially Christianity—as a “universal obsessional neurosis” which has for believers the merit that “their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing a personal one.”[31] With a similar approach, Judaism can be described as a “collective sociopathy.” This does not mean that “the Jews” are sociopaths, but rather that, in proportion to the degree of their identification as Jews, they are victims of a sociopathic mindset patterned from the Tanakh, “marked in their flesh” (impressed traumatically in their subconscious) by circumcision, and fuel by their elites with the paranoia of anti-Semitism. The difference between collective sociopathy and individual sociopathy is the same as between collective neurosis and individual neurosis according to Freud: participation in a collective sociopathic mentality allows members of the community to channel sociopathic tendencies toward the outside of the community, and to maintain inside a high degree of sociability."

Tweet and responses (AlytaDeLeon):
"Elizabeth Warren says her parents had to elope because she was part Cherokee and part Delaware. This entire situation is worse than I had thought."
blog comments powered by Disqus