Tuesday, December 24, 2019

Alphaghetti

"What India’s Prime Minister Modi can teach us about Zionism" (Cobban).  "Why Hindutva is a pariah in world opinion" (Bhadrakumar):
"The BJP leaders do not realise that flaunting Montblanc pens or wallets, keeping silk handkerchiefs in their coat pockets or wearing Patek Philippe wrist watches do not make them ‘modern’. Modernity is a matter of the mind and intellect. Modi cannot drag India back into a primitive epoch resembling the religious wars in medieval Europe and at the same time claim to represent the aspirations of modernity among Indians.
Simply put, Hindutva as an ideology is not contemporaneous with the 21st century. It isolates India in the world opinion. This is the lesson out of the present-day churning."
They looked at the West and saw the extreme success of Zionism, the Pure Evil of a primitive people, and assumed that this was considered by the rest of the world to be acceptable behavior, not realizing that the whole thing is sustained solely by blackmail and bribery of politicians, and has no actual support at all except among the minorities of the Khazars themselves, and the Christian Zionists, both of whom, as groups, are righteously held in utter contempt by everybody else.

(((They))) are trying to cover up what is going on in France as it constitutes the largest and most sustained protest in the world today against globo-homo-Rothschild-o - literally against a Rothschild puppet - and the sheer horror of living in a Khazarocracy.  "French strikers oppose “Christmas truce” called by Macron and trade unions" (Gnana/Lantier).  "Postcard From Paris" (Graham).  "A news chronology of France in 2019: The year of Yellow Vest rebellion" (Mazaheri).  They have somehow managed to avoid the usual, which is to have the Khazars capture the movement and completely emasculate it (e.g., BDS and various lite Zionist stunts).

Tweets by Agnes Callamard (UN Special Rapporteur on Extra-Judicial Executions) on the MbS decision to 'fix' his Khashoggi problem by executing the lowest level henchmen, with strikingly explicit criticism - for a UN official! - of MbS himself.

Tweet (Joe Catron):
"If we agree on nothing else about the Iranian state, all leftists should thank it for supporting the resistance in Palestine, Lebanon, and Yemen. Those who criticize it ― for the single best thing it, or any other state, does! ― put themselves outside and against the left."
Tweet (Steven Salaita):
"You can figure out the cartography of US imperialism simply by observing which Muslim populations around the world corporate media pretend to care about."
The most obvious example may be American support for the Muslim government in Bosnia, something which only happened as Serbia is considered by the Assholes to be a Russian proxy, so Islamophobia lost out to the Cold Warriors.

"Immigrants as a Weapon: Global Nationalism and American Power" (Levine).

You know how in many countries being elected provides protection from criminal prosecution, and thus many gangsters in places like Ukraine end up in the legislature for that very reason?  Well, there's a theory out there that Joe Biden didn't run because he wanted to be President, but solely to protect himself from Trump Administration investigation of the extreme criminal behavior of him and his son.  It has worked very well so far, up to and including impeachment.

"Hunter Biden Accused Of $156M Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme In Court Filing" (Durden).  Comment by SoDamnMad:
"Think about this. Joseph Cofer Black, former CIA counter intelligence specialist, joined the Burisma board on Feb 2016 with no energy or gas experience.  Could the CIA be laundering Afghan drug money into Burisma as "investments" then remove it through Burisma's Cyprus headquarters location into say the Baltic bank, Danske, in Estonia and from there to JP Morgan or other US banks or even offshore accounts?"
"Italian Prosecutors Believe Joseph Mifsud - The Man Who Started RussiaGate - "Is Dead"" (Carter) (see here). George begs to differ!  Looks like the Italians are helping the Assholes by establishing a narrative to explain why nobody in Washington appears to have the slightest interest in finding and interviewing the key conspirator in Russiagate.  Next we'll be hearing that Ghislaine died in a tragic accident trying to climb Mount Everest.

There's a good section in Lee Smith's book listing all the known associates of Mifsud - all American hegemon/British intelligence/NATO figures - and how completely ridiculous it is to suggest - and it is a principle platform of Russiagate, without which the whole thing falls apart - that Mifsud is a Kremlin asset.

Tweet (Dimitri Lascaris):
"Shame on the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission for rescinding a well-deserved award which it had conferred upon human rights activist Rana Zaman. By succumbing to the smears to which Rana has been subjected, @NSHumanRights
has betrayed its mission to protect #humanrights."
By the logic of shekels, the only human beings are Khazars, with everybody else being just farm animals, so, goyim, 'human rights' are just a tool to protect the right of the (((chosen))) to kill people and steal their land.  Stop criticizing the worthy members of the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, who have as much right as anybody to take the shekels!

Are you sure they made a mistake?

Tweets by Ahmad Barclay containing a spreadsheet on the Guardian's enthusiastic participation in (((slurring))) Labour.  The lying about Assange:  "groon scum" (Niqnaq).

"Boris Johnson: An Unlikely Jacobin, Challenging Today’s Paradigm" (Crooke). I like Crooke, but taking Boris at his word is a step too far.  Even if he meant what he said, the example of Trump and MAGA shows that deep change isn't going to happen.  Except for Brexit, everything about Boris is going to be awful gouging of the 99%.

On the other hand, superb Shamir:  "From Corbyn to Stalin to Rothschild":
"Jewish logic is astounding! The Jews fought Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour tooth and claw. Their newspapers claimed he is a new Hitler. Their Chief Rabbi issued a fatwa against Corbyn. Israel’s Foreign Minister said he hopes Corbyn will lose British election. And Labour had been soundly trashed in the British elections. Jews could congratulate themselves with this result: they’ve got what they wished. But such a response would be too simple-minded for Jews.

When the results of the elections became known, immediately, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz responded with: “The blaming of the Jews for this historic defeat has already begun. It will only get louder.” Well, this is the nature of elections. If you actively support one, winning side, you’d be congratulated by the winners and blamed by the losers. This is just, this is right. But it is not good enough for the Jews. The smart people want a better deal: to be congratulated by the winners, while the losers should just regret they haven’t had you on their side. They can’t blame you for it will be antisemitic act.

This is the great Jewish trick: they always win, and they never lose. When their side loses, they say they didn’t act qua Jews. Even if they pull the Jewish solidarity card, and say that as Jews they have to be for unlimited immigration everywhere but in Israel; or as Jews they want Corbyn to lose; you are not allowed to “blame” them for the result. The Jews are always blameless. You may congratulate them with the result, never blame.

Jonathan Freedland, the Guardian journalist who had worked overtime blowing Corbyn antisemitism hoax into flame, twitted “I predicted Labour would be defeated”. He was corrected: “it was not predicted, it was manufactured by you!” And the Jews responded with “How do you dare to blame a Jew?”

And now, if you are unhappy with Corbyn’s defeat, should you blame the Jews? Yes and no. No, because whatever Jews say, it is Brits that vote. No, so they won’t think that Jews decide everything. And still, yes. They contributed their energy to his defeat. The Jewish onslaught on Corbyn had one immediate unfortunate consequence: Corbyn have tried to accommodate the attackers and sought a compromise with wealthy Remainers at the expense of the workers. And a politician who accommodates Jews is likely to be defeated twice: once, by a politician who is totally, without reservations, on the Jewish side; and the second time, by your supporters who would leave you. This is what happened to Corbyn. He went towards Jews, away from the British working class; while on the Jewish territory, he was easily defeated by Johnson, the eager friend of Israel.

Corbyn had a chance: if he would unleash a Night of the Long Knives on Blairites after his victory in the party, if he would allow the party members to deselect the pro-Remain Blairite Jewish MPs, if he would drop silly pseudo-left notions of climate change, green economy, gender discourse, migrants, if he were to stick to the hard left class line, he would surely win. People are sick of fence sitters.

Instead of being horrified by Jewish fatwa, he could make it his banner. Instead of blessing Jews with the Hanukkah and getting “Go f*ck yourself” in return from Stephen Pollard, editor of the Jewish Chronicle, he could bless the British people with coming Christmas. But then, he won’t be Corbyn."
and (on globo-homo-Rothschild-o, Omidyar, Greenwald; my emphasis in red - I thought Shamir hated Blumenthal):
"– “Jewishness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only anti-Semites dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron’s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jewish community.” – told me a knowledgeable Jewish person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jewish community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I’ll call him JT. (My regular readers have met him in my preceding essay, and now he has his own Twitter account and a blog).
I almost hung up on him. When I see ‘Rothschild’, my hand reaches for the click-out button. I do not wait for ‘reptilians’ or ‘Rockefellers’ of another boring rant against bankers-and-Jews. What could one add to this over-researched (since 18th century) topic! However, JT added to our knowledge in this long piece.
He says that while Rothschilds are not as big as many other giant banks, and they have fewer assets, they have unique influence in politics, based on hundreds of years of experience. Joining Rothschilds is “considered a kind of rite of passage for executive appointments in the government”. That’s why Macron joined them looking for a political career. A short list of Rothschild alumni in the world’s largest corporations gives us Shell, De Beers, the Guardian – the newspaper that smeared Jeremy Corbyn as antisemite, the Economist, etc. They have hidden and secret contacts with other groups and persons of importance. And yes, they are often Jewish.
“As with the rest of the Jewish community the Rothschilds use their Jewishness to intimidate journalists into disinterest, and the Holocaust to prevent any appeal for transparency. Everyone who is anyone uses Jewishness for political purposes, and statesmen flock to this media-unfriendly brand.”
Their specialty is hiding wealth, and crooks running decrepit countries such as the Ukraine (Peter Poroshenko) hide and manage their stolen loot with the bank.
With offshore comes secrecy, influence, and tax avoidance. It is a considerably sought-after service, especially when laundered through the “Rothschild” brand.
JT makes an interesting observation. There were so many leaks of offshore banking – Panama leaks, Luxembourg Leaks, Bahamas Leaks, Paradise Paper Leaks – but none of them had revealed Rothschild’s offshores. There is a system to this madness: all the leaks are connected with the International Consortium for Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) financed and controlled by George Soros’s Open Society foundation and by Pierre Omidyar. They are the people who are promoted as a new Wikileaks, and their Glenn Greenwald as a new Assange.
But observe the difference. Julian Assange and his Wikileaks had made all the secret stuff available for you and me. We all can read the State Department cables. And Julian is locked up in the high security prison.
Glenn Greenwald has got the treasure trove of Snowden Files, gigabytes lifted from the NSA and CIA computers, likely to reveal the 9/11 conspiracy, planning of Middle Eastern wars, their spying on the American people – and he sits tight on it. We shall never see any of it. Not surprisingly, Greenwald prospers, eats well and sleeps well at his home with his boyfriend.
The brave researcher, Max Blumenthal wrote in a long and extensive piece about Omidyar’s activities:
Greenwald pledged in 2014 to build a secure “reading room” where outside journalists could review files at the publication’s New York City office. That room has not materialized. In October 2017, he published a cable from Snowden files that revealed Saudi Prince Salman bin Sultan explicitly directing a faction of Syrian insurgents to “light up” Damascus and “flatten” its civilian airport on March 18, 2013. The cable also revealed that Saudi Arabia had supplied 120 tons of explosives to the armed opposition, resulting in attacks on the Syrian presidential palace and locations across Damascus. That cable had been in the possession of The Intercept’s founders for over four years, but it was inexplicably held. Had it been released when they got it, people would learn that the so-called “moderate rebels” were, in fact, waging a campaign of terror on behalf of foreign sponsors – and perhaps, the Syrian war would be over sooner.
I wonder what was the reason of Snowden’s escape to Moscow? Why did he have to run away at all? Why did he have to steal the stuff nobody ever saw excepting Greenwald and his boss Omydiar? I really do not care that the greedy Feds intend to pocket Snowden’s royalties for the book he published. Let Omidyar compensate him.
Omidyar had bought Greenwald to assure that nothing of substance contained in Snowden’s files ever became public, and Greenwald sold the files and his own soul, provided he had it in the first place. The leaks that he publishes are those that fit into his schemes like Trump’s links to Putin.
And now sit tight for a surprise. Omidyar is the main backer behind the efforts of the infamous Anti-Defamation League (ADL) to run internet censorship by tech giants, reported Whitney Webb. Omidyar provided the capital to launch the ADL’s “new Silicon Valley center to fight intolerance” and to team up with Facebook, Twitter, Google and Microsoft — to create a Cyberhate Problem-Solving Lab for ultimate censorship.
Glenn Greenwald pretended for years to be a Palestine supporter, a harsh critic of Israeli apartheid. How come, Glenn, that now you play in the ADL team that brands Palestinian activists as hatemongers and antisemites? You pretended to be for peace and against US wars. How come that your team fights against Tulsi Gabbard, the only anti-war contender for the US presidency? Is that the voice of blood or the voice of blood money you earned? When you agree to accommodate a mysterious money-man, you end up in the embraces of ADL, apparently.
JT says that of all the countless mentions of Rothschild in the ICIJ databases, even relating to Jeffrey Epstein material, only two files are accessible, and they come from auditors, not ICIJ or their privatised leaks. The rest remains inaccessible. The ICIJ might even be described as “leak catchers,” a term corroborated by Mintpress’expose of Omydiar’s activities. And Rothschilds and their clients remain safe and protected."
Greenwald's good work in a number of areas seems to be a way to camouflage his part in the 'leak catching'.

"The Rothschilds, A Unique Family" ('JT') - lots of details.

"Reuters Shields OAS over False Claims that Sparked Bolivia Coup" (Emersberger). Who could imagine the Rothschilds would lie to the farm animals?

"Russia checks its internet can work if cut off from worldwide web" (Rothschilds).  With all the Khazar censorship in the once free west, Russia and China may be the only places with actual freedom of speech.

"In the U.K. -- Do Subjects Deserve Their Rulers?" (Vltchek):
"But seriously, could anyone in his or her sane state of mind vote for BoJo?

Just put Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn next to each other, and listen to each of them for ten minutes, and it would appear that anyone who would vote for the leader of the Conservative Party should be ripe for the mental asylum.

Unless… Unless! Yes, precisely: Unless he or she actually openly or secretly longs for those neo-liberal, deeply conservative “values”, which were introduced to the “Western world” by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, after some wild and extremist theories that were floated behind the walls of the Chicago School of Economics by market fundamentalists such as Friedman and Von Hayek. And after entire nations, such as Indonesia and Chile (both of them now lying in ruins), were raped, tied up and then used as guinea pigs.

Unless the British voters really admire Western imperialism, and that notorious, legendary, sadistic hand of the English teacher holding a ruler over the fingers of a petrified pupil, roaring threateningly: “Shall I?” Unless they truly like this kind of arrangement of the world.

I often wonder: What if they do? Perhaps they do. They most likely do, at least many of them. The voters, I mean…"
De-terrorizing news:  "SAA at the gates of Ma’arat Al-Nu’man - TTG".

Tweet (Susan of Texas):
"This is what your party leaders do: they hold climate talks while accelerating climate change. They tell you to call your representative to beg for healthcare while taking bribes to prevent you from getting healthcare."
A big part of The Clarification is that it has become obvious that Barry, Ol' Kil', Crooked Joe, and Pelosi, amongst many others, are all pure pieces of shit.

"The Ghost of FISA warrants past visits Judge Collyer" (Lang). The 'judges' were, of course, all in on the FBI's scamming and lying.  It was all a wink and a nod until it became politically convenient to pretend to be outraged by it.

"U.S. Media Bias Creates False Pictures Of Russia" (Moon). General attempts to make Russia seem inconsequential, and thus non-threatening, thus safely allowing massive Assholian provocations.

"Nord Stream 2: Washington to "Free" Europe From Freedom to Decide for Itself" (Cartalucci):
"The alleged spectre of a malign Russia preying on Europe serves as - and has served for decades as the foundation of the US-led NATO alliance, the US military presence in Europe and the billions upon billions of dollars of weapon sales, contracts, and all the political influence that constitutes both.

Europe and Russia building a significant pipeline and cooperating over something as key to Europe's economic security and survival as energy demand obviously and completely undermines NATO's pretense to exist - and thus threatens the immense racket that constitutes NATO's continued existence. This not only threatens Washington's grip on Europe, but all the other wars NATO is used as a vehicle to carry both the American nation and its Western allies into across the globe.
"
 "PEPE ESCOBAR: You Say You Want a (Russian) Revolution?":
"All across the Global South, scores of nations are very much aware that the U.S. economic “order” – rather disorder – is on the brink of collapse. In contrast, a cooperative, connected, rule-based, foreign relations between sovereign nations model is being advanced in Eurasia – symbolized by the merging of the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU), the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), the Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the NDB (the BRICS bank).

The key guarantors of the new model are Russia and China. And Beijing and Moscow harbor no illusion whatsoever about the toxic dynamics in Washington. My recent conversations with top analysts in Kazakhstan last month and in Moscow last week once again stressed the futility of negotiating with people described – with  overlapping shades of sarcasm – as exceptionalist fanatics. Russia, China and many corners of Eurasia have figured out there are no possible, meaningful deals with a nation bent on breaking every deal."
Grim litany of the 'narrative enforcers', aka 'journalists':  "Mainstream Media on OPCW Leaks – The Good, Bad and Downright Ugly" (Coombes).

"Former IDF intelligence personnel likely tied to UAE spy app, report says".

"An Anti-Semite’s Guide to Hanukkah" (Frei).

"Trumpian Rhetoric: The Case of His Letter to Pelosi (and Foreshadowing 2020)." (Strether). Trump has a strangely large number - for a sitting President - of rallies, in which he focus groups his lines ('lock her up' took off at the rallies).  Hillary also uses focus groups - 'deplorables' was run up the flag pole at ritzy parties in the Hamptons and on Martha's Vineyard, where the Khazar billionaires laughed and laughed, and the rest is history.

Tweet (Ben Norton):
"Venezuelan soldiers who betrayed their country and joined Trump's far-right coup attempt then fled to the US after the coup failed Now they are being detained by ICE in hellish conditions Lesson: Never ally with the US empire; it will always betray you"
"After Haftar Seizes Turkish Vessel, Erdogan Deepens Military Role In Libya, Angering Russia" (Durden).  Looks like an intentional provocation by Haftar the CIA. 

"Jeffrey Epstein's Brother Fears For His Life" (Durden) (note the McAfee tweet at the end, which suggests Epstein wasn't alone in his cell, as we've been told).  Alphaghetti.
blog comments powered by Disqus