Thursday, November 29, 2012

It would not surprise me in the least if Abbas, the Collaborator-in-Chief, after he gets his statehood vote, claims he had to make side-deals to get the votes, side-deals which prevent the Palestinians from having access to the International Criminal Court.  Access to legal sanctions against Israel is what World Jewry really fears, and would enable the Palestinians to fight using the lawfare which the Jews invented and perfected.  Expected collaboration would explain why Israel has stopped whining, and why Cameron floated the side-deal idea.

"'New Berkeley chancellor must renounce divestment position!'"  Note how he has to explain what his wife did ten years ago!  'Ferociously independent person'.  I think the Jews ought to set up reeducation camps where 'anti-Semites' can spend a decade or so in hard manual labor until they become sufficiently evil for reintroduction to society.

"Palestinians under occupation should demand voting rights (Goldberg’s latest variation)"  Weird on so many levels.

Ray Charles passes up Sun City:  "Stevie Wonder Saw The Light After All … Pulls Out Of IDF Support Concert"  This was odd from the beginning.  Almost all the musicians who perform Zionist-supporting concerts, whether in Israel or elsewhere, are losers who are desperate for the gig. 

Grotesque caricatures

"Syria: "The menagerie of 'rebel' has not been able to hold ANY ground at all against government forces when they wish to retake it""  Despite what you may read in the Jew-controlled media, this hasn't changed since the beginnings of the foreign intervention.

"Minor victory for the antisemitism card":

"There have been many grotesque caricatures of Jews in the past and, of course, more recently.  One recurring theme is the power of Jews to manipulate apparently powerful politicians.  But what do we do when reality resembles these antisemitic caricatures?"

"Brayer: The Absolute Right of Palestinian Resistance" Never forget it. The only restraint on the Palestinians is effectiveness.  All the moral fault lies on the oppressors.

Atzmon:  "Paul Larudee: BDS, Arab Land and the Custodian of Absentee Property"  I'm sick and tired of all the 'tactics' (which are almost always a cover for some form of lite Zionism).  The goal is to permanently remove any Jew-controlled political entity from the Middle East.  It will be then up to the Palestinians what role Jews will play in their state.  BDS is one of the tools to cause a legitimacy crisis in the Jewish state, and that is why it is so feared by lite Zionists and why they are constantly messing with it.

"Britain and the Palestinian vote at the UN"  You didn't think they were going to do the right thing, did you?  Note what the Jews are really afraid of.

"The Way of the World"  The entire scam that is the stock market is based on what is supposed to be illegal, insider trading.

Monday, November 26, 2012

All this talk that the Gaza attack was really about Iran might as well come straight out of Bibi's office (and if you keep reading the same sort of 'Iran talk' from the same source, you might want to consider who is funding that source).  From the Angry Arab:

"Western media, or experts cited in Western media, are often so ignorant of the realities in the Middle East.  They have been railing about Iranian role in the war on Gaza in the last few weeks.  Most analysts cited did not even know that there has been conflict between Iran and Hamas over the last several months.  Khaild Mish`al relations with Iran has deteriorated as he has been receiving more cash support from GCC countries--not only Qatar."

Weiss is forthcoming on his censorship in discussing the surprisingly brave, and surprisingly still employed, Patrick Pexton:

"Pexton raises a delicate and important issue. By identifying the religion of complaint-writers (on what basis I can only surmise; hey, I also guess at last names), he is saying that American Jews support Israel overwhelmingly. Well, it is on this basis that some have blamed the American Jewish collective for Israel's behavior, and said that any American Jewish organization is responsible for the human rights atrocities Israel is committing. I am saying that Pexton's generalization could foster anti-Semitism, as more and more Americans are disgusted by Israel's actions and look around for who to blame for Israel's impunity from accountability.
Which leads to my challenge. Isn't it time that American media organizations and American Jewish groups began pulling apart the issue of To what extent the American Jewish community is married to Israel? I.e., When did Zionism (Jewish nationalism) ravish the Jewish community, and why? How many American Jews are no longer drinking that potion? I think the answer is, Many object to Israel's conduct. And it's time we heard from them. Because their argument is persuasive, and because an open fight among American Jews over Israel's conduct will help everyone. More later.
(P.S. In fairness, once sharing Pexton's generalization, I used to do posts saying that there are too many Jews on the Israel beat in our newspapers and too many Jews at the Council on Foreign Relations. I dropped that line because it was imprecise and because I came to believe, based on all the anti-Zionists I was meeting, that there is actual diversity inside the Jewish community. The media ought to foster that diversity by reporting on it.)"

Weiss perceives his job as protecting American Jews from the consequences of their Zionism.  Of course, in so doing he provides them space to continue to do the evil that they do.

"Obama 'drone-warfare rulebook' condemned by human rights groups"  We must never forget that 'Hollywood', i.e., rich liberal Jews, are behind this, as the drones are substitutes for the boots on the ground in fighting the Wars For The Jews.  Just another example of the destruction of international law by Zionism.

Pilger:  "As Gaza is savaged again, BBC’s role is exposed":

"This is notably true in the Middle East, where the Israeli state has successfully intimidated the BBC into presenting the theft of Palestinian land and the caging, torturing and killing of its people as an intractable “conflict” between equals. Standing in the rubble from an Israeli attack, one BBC journalist went further and referred to “Gaza’s strong culture of martyrdom”. So great is the distortion that young viewers of BBC news have told Glasgow University researchers they are left with the impression that Palestinians are the illegal colonisers of their own country. The current BBC “coverage” of Gaza’s genocidal misery reinforces this."

"NYC Haredim Voted Overwhelmingly For Romney"

"Dotcom: We've hit the jackpot" The FBI is an organized crime organization, and, in this case, is working for 'Hollywood'.

"Canned hunt"

Host Management: A Guide For Parasites

I keep reading how clever Bibi is, and how the attack on Gaza was part of a larger brilliant strategy against Egypt, Syria, or Iran.  I think it is time we put the 'smart Jew' meme to bed.  Israel hasn't done anything smart in decades, and the latest Gaza mass murder is just another in a sad list of hopeless stupidities.  What exactly did Bibi think was going to happen?

I return to the idea that there are two types of Jewish billionaires, the Jews who support Obama and the Obama Doctrine (these Jews we could call 'Hollywood'), and the Jews like Sheldon who won't accept anything less than full boots-on-the-ground Wars For The Jews.

It is primarily a difference in opinion on how to properly manage a host from the point of view of the parasite.  World Jewry and its Zionist Empire is a parasite on the United States.  The problem for all parasites is how to extract the most resources from the host before it dies.  Parasites generally have an alternative host to move to, but no other powerful country is stupid enough, or corrupt enough in the proper way, to fall into that trap.  Once the American Empire is dead, the Jews have no more options.  Sheldon believes he can still extract more boots-on-the-ground Wars For The Jews before the United States is just a hollowed-out shell; 'Hollywood' accepts Obama's assertion that the Obama Doctrine is the best he can do, and that maximum value from what is left of the American Empire can only be obtained in a more limited way.

Bibi threw his lot in with Romney and Sheldon, and almost certainly can't even contact Obama directly to get a feel for the American position.  Obama has 'Hollywood' backing to protect the interests of the American Empire, at least as far as keeping it alive long enough to maximize Jewish parasitic value extraction.  Bibi's lack of access and information, together with the bifurcation in American Jewish billionaire positions, is a recipe for Israeli disaster.  The only reason Bibi is still around is that the generals who really run Israel are as stupid as he is.

Innocence

The deep and easy innocence of a group supremacist:

1. "Gazans are ‘ho-hum’ about the deaths of relatives — NYT’s Rudoren";
2. "NYT’s Jodi Rudoren responds to criticism of Facebook comments"

Note the amusing 180 degree turn after someone informed her that Weiss is an integral part of the Zionist project, reinforcing the idea that there can be a 'good Jew' who allows superficial criticism of Zionism - just don't mention Jewish 'culture'! - while concealing the time wasting strategy - while slowly killing people and stealing their land - that is the essence of modern Zionism.

This general idea that the outsiders are of a much lower status, and so can't suffer like real human beings do while the supremacist group takes their lives and property, is a constant in group supremacist writing.    Remember the more 'liberal' Rudoren was supposed to be an improvement over Bronner, a man whose Zionist conflicts of interest were so extreme that they (eventually) forced the New York Times to replace him.

Clarification

These periodic bouts of Jewish ritual slaughter of gentiles are . . . clarifying.  For example, it is simply not possible for anyone to watch or read any snippet of Gaza coverage from the mainstream media and miss the fact that the Jews own and control the media, and that they manipulate the coverage for the purposes of advancing the cause of violent Jewish group supremacism.

Similarly, the public reaction of the American government, both executive branch and legislative branch, makes clear the cost of Jewish billionaire financing of American political candidates.  Meanwhile, the American government is furiously working behind the scenes to try to mitigate some of the horrible damage done to the United States by this pandering to the Jewish billionaires.

In a nutshell, the Obama Doctrine - the deal between Barry and the Jewish billionaires - is that the United States will publicly back any bouts of Jewish ritual slaughter of gentiles while maintaining the right to try to reel in the Israeli government quietly and behind the scenes.  At the same time, the Americans do not need to put boots on the ground, or take any precipitous steps that might lead to the Americans having to put boots on the ground, in any future Wars For The Jews, as long as they fight any and all Wars For The Jews required of them using:

1. drone warfare, and
2. economic sanctions, and,
3. proxy armies like the MEK or 'al Qaeda'.

Hoist with their own petard

Cryptome on Petraeus/Broadwell.  Oddly naive.  Both Petraeus and Broadwell were part of the Intelligence Industrial Complex, and would have reasonably expected that:

1. all their communications would be monitored by some bored NSA boffin; and
2. there would be absolutely no negative consequences to either of them, affair or no affair.

The Intelligence Industrial Complex is part of the War On Terror, which is itself just a tool of the institutional Islamophobia intended to assist Jews in killing people and stealing their land to build a Zionist Empire across the Middle East.  The War On Terror does not apply to upper middle class white people.  In fact, it almost never applies to white people of any class.  If it did, political pressure would instantly put a stop to the whole thing.

I've already reviewed the series of extremely unlikely things that had to have happened for Petraeus, Broadwell and Allen to have been caught.  There is an enjoyable irony - Schadenfreude - in watching these people who lived and prospered off the evil of Islamophobia get hoist with their own petard.

If the old white architect who publishes Cryptome were black, or, heaven forbid, Muslim, he'd be in jail right now.

This posting may be dangerous to your health

"Kurtz Rips Murdoch for 'Atrocious' Tweet Suggesting 'Jewish' Press Have Hidden Agenda"

Some blog postings should come with a health warning.  Seriously, you could laugh so hard that you might do yourself life-threatening harm.  Don't read the following quote from Howard Kurtz unless you are sure that you have full health insurance:

"And beyond that, this media mogul who isn't shy about interfering in his own newsrooms is suggesting that Jewish Americans have a hidden agenda in which their religion trumps their commitment to journalism.  That is atrocious and it is beneath Rupert Murdoch."

The "Jewish owned press"

"Born again Christian Zionist Rupert Murdoch berates "Jewish owned press""

This is funny on so many levels, particularly coming through the very touchy lite Zionists at Jews sans frontieres.  It is always a lite Zionist festival of self-congratulation whenever the ongoing Jewish violence gets too obvious (see also Finkelstein, Mondoweiss, etc).  Much celebration of Jewish violence accompanied by tut-tut-tutting.

The Angry Arab has been documenting all the ridiculously slanted overage of the mainstream media. I notice the New York Times is - under overwhelming provocation - now included amongst the 'Zionist media', though I assume the more telling 'Jew-controlled media' is still treif.  'Zionist media' is completely meaningless as, per Noam, Zionism is just a branch of American imperialism (an easy mistake to make these days, with the Jew-controlled Obama and the Jew-controlled Congress enabling the Jewish violence in every possible way).

There is no way to hide the massive disproportionality of the Jewish violence, so the main media theme is that somehow the Jews are constantly reacting to Palestinian violence, an outright Jewish lie:

1. "Time line of attacks and responses between Hamas and Israel plus analysis."
2. "How Israel shattered Gaza truce leading to escalating death and tragedy: a timeline"
3. "Gaza: Timeline, Fineline and Endgame"

 Bonus fun, this time through the concentration camp guard.

Added:  More laughs:  "Worried about Zionist pets: for the Jerusalem Post"

Showing off the new dome

There have been a number of theories why Bibi decided to go apeshit at this particular time.  Of course, the massive weight of evidence, including the gloating, is that Jews just enjoy watching gentiles die cruel deaths.  There is also a formula in Bibi's office which shows him how many additional votes he gets with every slaughtered Palestinian child.

But I'm thinking Lebanon, particularly the planned Jewish theft of the waters of the Litani River.  The problem is the retaliatory rockets fired by Hezbollah in self-defense, and the fear of such retaliation in the Jewish population.  The Iron Dome is a PR exercise in order to make the upcoming illegal attack seem safe for Jewish Israelis.

It has been a dismal failure, but it is being spun as an incredible success.  Its targets are homemade, very slow rockets fired by amateur collaborators of the Israelis - thus giving the Israelis a pretty good idea of the trajectories - and the vast majority of rockets are getting through.  Hezbollah, with professional rockets and professional rocket technicians, will do much, much better.

Iron Dome as a military device - abject failure.  Iron Dome as a PR device to fool Israelis - overwhelming success.  I'm not complaining.  This is the sure road to the end of the Jewish state.

If it wasn't for bad luck, the generals would have no luck at all

Calculating the series of really unlikely events that had to occur for General Petraeus and General Allen to get in such trouble:

1. Jill Kelley had to overreact to Paula Broadwell's innocuous emails;
2. Jill Kelley had to be really connected to the FBI, enough to have them to take an interest in, and waste a shitload of money on, a completely non-criminal issue;
3. an FBI employee had to be a total freak willing to risk his career to politicize this non-issue;
4. the tale had to make its way to Eric Cantor, with his peculiar Jewish and personal interest in going after Petraeus;
5. the investigation had to uncover a totally different massive email correspondence between Kelley and General Allen, the risk of discovery of which apparently didn't disturb Kelley.

Of course, number 5 may not be an unlikely event but the real intent of the exercise.

Had any of these unlikely events not occurred, General Petraeus would still be leading the CIA and General Allen would be well on his way to being named Supreme Allied Commander Europe.

Another way of looking at it

Good link from MarxMarvelous in the comments:  "Are the Twins Operatives for a Foreign Intelligence Agency?"  I'm struggling to see that Paula Broadwell actually did anything wrong (they're going to hang her on her research, which seems to be more the fault of Petraeus than her).  In fact, is it possible that her efforts were an attempt at getting a potential national security threat away from Petraeus?  I know we're supposed to see her as the crazy woman scorned, but, absent some strange and possibly criminal actions by a bizarro FBI, she might have been able to stop a mini coup d'etat.

Enemy of the Jews

Israel assassinated a Hamas commander not because he threatened Israel's security, but because he threatened Israel's 'insecurity' through his work on a truce.  You'll never see a hint of that in the American Jew-controlled media.

Thurdsay, November 15, 2012

"Wow, Small World"

"Meet the Lebanese characters in the Petraeus affair: on the "persecution" of Catholics in Lebanon"

Fashionable in certain circles:  "Lockheed Martin exec resigns after affair"

"Jonathan Langdale":

"Dude, Petraeus went to Tripoli himself right after Broadwell's keynote in late October, when & where he conducted a personal investigation into Benghazi.

I think Petraeus confirmed that politically motivated agents disobeyed orders and made the attack than it would have been.  Then it comes down to who disobeyed orders.  If that person doesn't like Petraeus and doesn't like Obama, that person probably played the affair card.  So Petraeus called their bluff and resigned (the affair is a manufactured excuse, or a convenient one).

GOP knew about this to some degree, but it was classified and they couldn't be caught leaking it before the election.  The best they could do was the FOX story on the 26th, also before Petraeus' trip.

This has Benghazi written all over it.  The scandal is what FOX reported, except it's worse."

"Knuckle-draggers"

The concentration camp guard's latest job is to convince Americans how wonderful and non-threatening the Syrian rebels are.

"Is Israel Escalating War on Gaza to Foil US-Iran Deal?"  No, as Hamas has broken with Syria-Iran so its leaders can be free to accept the Qatari graft payments.

"Did a CIA Drone Really Level Two Homes in Indianapolis?"  Sorcha Faal, so reader beware, but something like this will happen soon enough in the United States.

I've always liked Emo, but prefer the crazier, younger version, which I guess was too creepy as he became older:  "Well Then"

Backgrounds

Those investigative journalists at Stormfront spent pages and pages trying to prove Paula Broadbent was Jewish, and only came up with a family photo with one family member wearing as sweater with a Christmas tree on it in a house decorated with pointsettias.  She comes from Bismarck, N.D. and is extremely athletic and extremely military.

It appears someone has altered her biography to add the words:  "Born to A Jewish family which relocated to Bismark, North Dakota".

On the other hand, Jill Kelley is of Maronite Christian background (note the typical completely backasswards spin).

Like a wedding party hit by a drone

"Levin: Number of e-mails between Kelley and Allen ‘astounding’"  Between 20,000 and 30,000 pages of e-mails.  I wonder if General John Allen, the guy who runs the War For The Jews - Afghanistan Division, is the real target of all this, and Petraeus is just collateral damage, like a wedding party hit by a drone.  Or maybe it is a two-for-one special.

"Paula Broadwell's Father: 'This Is About Something Else Entirely, And The Truth Will Come Out'"

"Paula Broadwell’s Driver’s License Discovered in D.C. Park As Things Just Keep Getting Crazier"

My emphasis in red:  "The revelation threatens to fell another of the U.S. military’s biggest names after Petraeus’ surprise resignation last week. It also complicates President Barack Obama’s efforts to wind down the war in Afghanistan and reorganize his national security team following his re-election."

Angry Arab:  "By the way, this has not been known in the US press. But Jill Kelley who was the one who alerted the FBI to the harassing emails from Paula Broadwell is a Lebanese woman.  Her name is Jill Khawwam."

Note the comment by MichaelX to this 'flowchart':

"I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I'm convinced Jill Kelley is a spook. The sudden shift of reports from "she works for the State Department" to "wait no, she's an 'unpaid social planner.'" The seemingly overreaching step of triggering an FBI probe when she started getting emails about Petraeus. The swift hiring of a team of Washington power lawyers and crisis management experts. I mean, if it's true, she's clearly not that great at keeping a low profile, but still.. "

Added: "Jill Kelley, Woman Who Sparked Petraeus Scandal, Ran Questionable Charity"

Cantor 2016

The scandal, which is really getting out of hand, does have a Jewish conspiracy angle, as it was Eric Cantor who really set the end of Petraeus in motion.  To put it bluntly, if Cantor had not intervened, nothing would have come of this 'scandal', and Petraeus would have been running the CIA until Presidential politics called.  Why would Cantor want to do this?;

1. Petraeus' candor about Israel made him not 'good for the Jews';
2. Petraeus' testimony on Benghazi would not be good for the ongoing series of Wars For The Jews; and
3. if Cantor should want to be the first Jewish President Petraeus might well be his biggest obstacle to getting the Republican nomination.

Buchanan: "Petraeus and Benghazi: A Time for Truth":

"There are four basic questions.

Why were repeated warnings from Benghazi about terrorist activity in the area ignored and more security not provided, despite urgent pleas from Stevens and others at the consulate?

Why was the U.S. military unable to come to the rescue of our people begging for help, when the battle in Benghazi lasted on and off for seven hours?

Who, if anyone, gave an order for forces to “stand down” and not go to the rescue of the consulate compound or the safe house? A week before Petraeus’ resignation, the CIA issued a flat denial that any order to stand down ever came from anyone in the agency.

Fourth, when the CIA knew it was a terrorist attack, why did Jay Carney on Sept. 13, David Petraeus to Congress on Sept. 14, U.N. Amb. Susan Rice on Sept 16 on five TV shows, and Obama before the U.N. two weeks after 9/11 all keep pushing what the CIA knew was a false and phony story: That it had all come out of a spontaneous protest of an anti-Islamic video made by some clown in California?

There was no protest. Was the video-protest line a cover story to conceal a horrible lapse of security before the attack and a failure to respond during the attack — resulting in the slaughter?"

The biggest issue is the only issue in American politics, how Obama retained his Jewish Billionaire funding. He managed to convince the Jews that America could simply no longer fight the expected Wars For The Jews with boots on the ground and full-fledged wars.  What it can do is fight the Wars For The Jews using new, smarter means - sanctions, proxy armies, and drones.  The sane-ish Jewish Billionaires - i.e., not Sheldon - accepted this as the best possible violence the gentiles could provide under all the circumstances.

So the private CIA purporting to secure the CIA field office in Benghazi did a deal with the proxy fighters in Libya, Sunni Islamist militants who hate America and are generally called 'al-Qaeda', that there would be a spectacular attack on the compound which would increase business for the private CIA and liberate a few imprisoned 'al-Qaeda' fighters held by the Americans.  The real CIA either didn't know about it or agreed to look the other way (as many in the CIA look to retire to lucrative jobs with the private CIA).  The scandals of allowing this to happen and using 'al-Qaeda' to fight Wars For The Jews were so important that Obama officials lied and blamed everything on the movie.  There still is no evidence that there actually was an affair - though Petraeus gave a star-struck biographer w-a-y too much access - but Petraeus got caught in an enormous amount of American-Zionist crossfire.

Bunny boiler theory to the rescue

"FBI Scrutinized on Petraeus"

"A Petraeus Puzzle: Were Politics Involved?"

"Timeline of events surrounding CIA Director Petraeus' resignation"

The newest Official Story that the other woman was a bit of a bunny boiler puts to rest the possibility that she was part of an espionage action against Petraeus, as she'd hardly go out of her way in attacking the possible other other woman if it would wreck the operation.  This relieves some embarrassment at the CIA.

The FBI employee improperly going to the Republicans is funny as Petraeus is a Republican and was a possible Presidential candidate, and God knows the Republicans are in desperate need of a Presidential candidate who isn't a complete joke.

The newest Official Story has it that Petraeus didn't fall on his sword as an honorable man, but waited until he had no choice except resigning.

Added:  the Jews-did-it theory, always an excellent guess, but a bit strained here:  "A Covert Affair:  Petraeus Caught in the Honeypot?"

The Benghazi affair

"The Convenient Resignation of General Petraeus"  Careful neocon sniping contains a little truth:  ". . . . . barring a subpoena, the primary witness to who ordered the CIA to stand down in Benghazi has been removed."

"CIA director Petraeus resigns citing extramarital affair, will not testify on Benghazi attack in Libya"

Agony aunt conspiracy:  "Did Paula Broadwell’s Cuckolded Husband Write a Letter to Chuck Klosterman in the The New York Times?"  Unlikely as part of the wider conspiracy as the letter was written before the attack on Benghazi.

The 'fan fiction':  "The Legend of David Petraeus"  Petraeus is w-a-y too careful in building his carefully constructed legend to make this kind of mistake.  By the way, the biography written by the alleged adulteress is called - wait for it - "All In".

Slate (my emphasis in red):

"It had long been rumored that something was going on between Petraeus and Broadwell. Her book, co-written with Vernon Loeb, is widely regarded as a valentine to the general. When she was embedded with him in Afghanistan, they went on frequent 5-mile runs together. But Petraeus went on 5-mile runs with many reporters, and few people who knew him took the rumors seriously. In his personal life, he’s always been seen as a straight shooter, a square. Few could have imagined that his end would come as the result of a morals scandal."

The two political issues around Benghazi - issues which never come up in the discussion as they embarrass both parties - are:

1. the American use/misuse of radical Sunni Islamists to conduct proxy wars, and
2. the foolish use of a 'private CIA' whose motives are exactly the opposite of the motives of the American government and who may have been involved in a conspiracy to allow the attack on Benghazi to succeed.

Now everything can be swept under the carpet.

Painting yourself into the hate corner

Finally!:  "Did The Republican Party’s Vilification Of Muslim Americans Just Cost It The Presidency?" linking to "The GOP And Me."

"National Exit Poll: Asians vote 74-25 for Obama"  Probably a lot of Muslims in this group.

On blacks doing poorly under Obama and voting for him anyway . . . it is not illogical when you consider that Romney is effectively a high priest in a religion that still thinks - though they play it down - that blacks are literally devils.

Insulting and viciously attacking everybody who isn't a white male has caused so many problems for the Republicans that some paleocons are urging a disassociation from the Christian Evangelicals.  The only problem is that Christian Evangelicals are most of their current voters.

Carrying on Kahane

Can you imagine what would happen if a prominent and (unfortunately) influential columnist at an important American magazine admitted to having been a member of the KKK?:  "The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg Was a Follower of Jewish Rightwing Terrorist Meir " (via Silverstein).

The Drone King

I almost fell off my chair when I looked at the picture:

"Senior Obama Adviser Leads Secret Talks With Iran"

How can this be?

"A long war in the shadows"  Summary:  the US must use 'al Qaeda' as proxies to fight its wars, while simultaneously killing 'al Qaeda' members.

"The Permanent Militarization of America"

"British Have Invaded Nine Out of Ten Countries"  America just follows the master.

"Nicholas Levene, City financier, jailed for fraud"  A mini-Madoff, with the obligatory 'home in Israel'.

"Carleton University and the silencing of dissent"  Imagine the amount of effort expended by the Jews in almost every university in the Western world.

"The Long Con: Mail-order conservatism"  Right-wing political nonsense free with every order of snake oil.

"The Wrong Side Absolutely Must Not Win"  Reflect as you vote for the Blessed Barry, the Drone King.

Motive, means, and opportunity, and the only mofos around

Ever since I read the comments to this Moon of Alabama posting, with all the varying conjectures and inconsistencies in the Official Story, I've been thinking that there was only one interested party who really benefited from the Benghazi attack.  Even 'al Qaeda' failed to benefit, as Christopher Stevens was on their side, in the middle of provisioning their cousins fighting in Syria.  No, the single, solitary beneficiary of the attack was the private security company hired to make sure it didn't happen.  As a general rule, if one party:

1. was the sole beneficiary of an event; and
2. was supposed to prevent that event, but didn't

you would probably want to take a good, hard look at their possible culpability.

Stratfor: "they know shit about nothing"

"Behind the Sources (I): The One-Stop Shop"  Great detective work in discovering yet another player in the Hezbollah-disparagement industry (the analysis of the payment trail seems fairly conclusive, and the last line of the article is my title).  This is just a small part of the greater propaganda program being conducted by World Jewry, with Stratfor playing a key role throughout.

"Could The US Have Saved Tens Of Thousands Of Jews From The Holocaust? Maybe Not"  I really, really enjoy the underlying Jewish supremacist assumption that the United States was under a moral imperative to risk the lives of its own citizens - not to mention imperiling the war effort, possibly risking the United States itself, and thus leading to the death of more Jews in the process -  to take an unlikely flyer on possibly stopping something it really didn't know was happening.

It is like watching hyenas eat:  "Discredited Nazi-Looted Art Hunter Loses Suit":

"A federal judge rebuffed a disbarred lawyer's second attempt to stake a claim against Nazi-looted art in Czech galleries on behalf of Holocaust survivors.
     Before his ouster, Edward Fagan successfully represented thousands of Holocaust survivors and their descendents in restitution lawsuits over bank accounts and property confiscated from Nazi victims during Hitler's occupation of Europe. Fagan's reputation and business, however, began to decline after former clients accused him of negligence and fraud.
     Fagan was dismissed from the New York and New Jersey Bars in 2008, after a federal judge found no trace of a Holocaust survivor group Fagan purported to represent and imposed sanctions that Fagan could not pay."

"Average White Wealth = 22 x Average Black Wealth":

"In fact, blacks are worse off than they were four years ago. The wealth gap between blacks and whites has doubled, with whites now having 22 times the average wealth of blacks. The education gap has increased. While the national unemployment rate has remained fairly steady under the Obama administration, black unemployment has gone up 11%.

One can argue about the cause of those changes and the degree to which Obama bears any responsibility for either creating them or fixing them. But one cannot argue about the fact of them: the ascent of America’s first black president has coincided with the one of the steepest descents of the economic fortunes of black Americans since the second world war both in real terms and relative to whites.

This situation stands in stark contrast to the devotion of black voters to the president’s election. Both four years ago and now Obama can count on 90% of the vote from the African-American community, though as one community leader told Younge, that’s 90% of those motivated enough to go vote. Yet the fact remains that the group most loyal to Obama has benefited least from his tenure. Still, very few members of that group have questioned the president's approach or policies, at least publicly."

"Hard-hit by sanctions, Iran suspends 20-percent uranium enrichment"  "Iran denies suspending uranium enrichment":

"This article was corrected on 4 November 2012. An earlier version of this story ran with the headline "Iran suspends uranium enrichment" based on Asafari's quotes as reported by al-Arabiya."

"Remembering Abu Jihad and why, really, the Israelis killed him"

"British millionaire pleads guilty in Iran missile scheme"

I also enjoy reading 'Langley' on Langley:  "Republicans Tip world off to covert CIA Role in Libya"  The desperate Republicans think they have a political issue in Benghazi, and they do, except for the small problem that they can't discuss what the real problem is.  "Obama’s New Libyan Defense Chief: Bush’s Paul Wolfowitz, on Benghazi"  The photo looks 'shopped to morph George Bush in there somehow.

"Campaign to Establish a Canadian Department of Peace"

She can see right through you

Niqnaq quotes Glick (I like how she adds the casino, for Sheldon no reason).  You see how it works?  You can try your hardest to be 'progressive' and politically correct, but Glick sees right through you.  Your feeble attempts at euphemism just prove how obsessed you are in your Jew-hatred.  Goddammit, the Jews have a right to run the banks, the courts, the universities, the governments and the wars, and who are you to question any of it?

Consistent devotion to truthfulness is the only talisman against Evil.

Timing

"Israel 'admits' killing Arafat's deputy"

"Khalil al-Wazir Death: Israel Admits To Assassination Of Abu Jihad, Arafat Deputy In 1988"

So why is the violet supremacist Jewish collective announcing this now?  Could it be a warning to the Palestinian leadership about the current UN statehood bid?  The Jews have a long and sordid history of using legal trickery by their lawyers - I think the technical term is 'shysters' - to 'legitimize' their murdering and thieving,  Thugs like Dershowitz and Cotler spend all their days scheming up new tricks, and the massive Jewish legal sniping against Iran is just a small example of this.  The violet supremacist Jewish collective is terrified that any kind of recognition will allow the Palestinians access to the World Court.