Tuesday, July 31, 2018


You should probably just read this:  "American Pravda: The Nature of Anti-Semitism" (Unz).  After evaluating some of the numerous debunkings of the famous lies which have evoked the 'anti-Semite' slur (I have to note again that 99% of those involved in the racket aren't even remotely 'Semites', making the whole thing even more bizarre), towards the end he examines how they get away with such a series of cons:
"Observers have noticed that even fairly small Jewish minorities may often have a major impact upon the far larger societies that host them. But on the other hand, in my experience at least, a large majority of individual Jews do not seem all that different in their personalities or behavior than their non-Jewish counterparts. So how does a community whose individual mean is not so unusual generate what seems to be such a striking difference in collective behavior? I think the answer may involve the existence of information choke-points, and the ability of relatively small numbers of particularly zealous and agitated Jews in influencing and controlling these.

We live our lives constantly immersed in media narratives, and these allow us to decide the rights and wrongs of a situation. The vast majority of people, Jew and Gentile alike, are far more likely to take strong action if they are convinced that their cause is a just one. This is obviously the basis for war-time propaganda.

Now suppose that a relatively small number of zealous Jewish partisans are known to always attack and denounce journalists or authors who accurately describe Jewish misbehavior. Over time, this ongoing campaign of intimidation may cause many important facts to be left on the cutting-room floor, or even gradually expel from mainstream respectability those writers who refuse to conform to such pressures. Meanwhile, similar small numbers of Jewish partisans frequently exaggerate the misdeeds committed against Jews, sometimes piling their exaggerations upon past exaggerations already produced by a previous round of such zealots.

Eventually, these two combined trends may take a complex and possibly very mixed historical record and transform it into a simple morality-play, with innocent Jews tremendously injured by vicious Jew-haters. And as this morality-play becomes established it deepens the subsequent intensity of other Jewish-activists, who redouble their demands that the media “stop vilifying Jews” and covering up the supposed evils inflicted upon them. An unfortunate circle of distortion following exaggeration following distortion can eventually produce a widely accepted historical account that bears little resemblance to the reality of what actually happened.

So as a result, the vast majority of quite ordinary Jews, who would normally behave in quite ordinary ways, are misled by this largely fictional history, and rather understandably become greatly outraged at all the horrible things that had been done to their suffering people, some of which are true and some of which are not, while remaining completely ignorant of the other side of the ledger.

Furthermore, this situation is exacerbated by the common tendency of Jews to “cluster” together, perhaps respresenting just one or two percent of the total population, but often constituting 20% or 40% or 60% of their immediate peer-group, especially in certain professions. Under such conditions, the ideas or emotional agitation of some Jews probably permeates others around them, often provoking additional waves of indignation.

As a rough analogy, a small quantity of uranium is relatively inert and harmless, and entirely so if distributed within low-density ore. But if a significant quantity of weapons-grade uranium is sufficiently compressed, then the neutrons released by fissioning atoms will quickly cause additional atoms to undergo fission, with the ultimate result of that critical chain-reaction being a nuclear explosion. In similar fashion, even a highly agitated Jew may have no negative impact, but if the collection of such agitated Jews becomes too numerous and clusters together too closely, they may work each other into a terrible frenzy, perhaps with disastrous consequences both for themselves and for their larger society. This is especially true if those agitated Jews begin to dominate certain key nodes of top-level control, such as the central political or media organs of a society.

Whereas most living organizations exist solely in physical reality, human beings also occupy an ideational space, with the interaction of human consciousness and perceived reality playing a major role in shaping behavior. Just as the pheromones released by mammals or insects can drastically affect the reactions of their family members or nest-mates, the ideas secreted by individuals or the media-emitters of a society can have an enormous impact upon their fellows.

A cohesive, organized group generally possesses huge advantages over a teeming mass of atomized individuals, just as a Macedonian Phalanx could easily defeat a vastly larger body of disorganized infantry. Many years ago, on some website somewhere I came across a very insightful comment regarding the obvious connection between “anti-Semitism” and “racism,” which our mainstream media organs identify as two of the world’s greatest evils. Under this analysis, “anti-Semitism” represents the tendency to criticize or resist Jewish social cohesion, while “racism” represents the attempt of white Gentiles to maintain a similar social cohesion of their own. To the extent that the ideological emanations from our centralized media organs serve to strengthen and protect Jewish cohesion while attacking and dissolving any similar cohesion on the part of their Gentile counterparts, the former will obviously gain enormous advantages in resource-competition against the latter."

Monday, July 30, 2018

Precedented nefariousness

"What do they know? Mystery as Russia LIQUIDATED almost ALL of its holdings in US Treasury securities during run up to Helsinki summit, in move labeled 'unprecedented' by experts".  "Trump's goal to keep China from using 'nuclear option' of dumping US debt – Max Keiser".

"I traced missile casings in Syria back to their original sellers, so it’s time for the west to reveal who they sell arms to" (Fisk).  "Robert Fisk: "I Traced Al-Qaeda Missile Casings In Syria Back To Their Original Sellers"" (Durden).  "Islamic State Drone Program Study Reveals NATO Ratlines" (Gunnar).

"British Assassination Campaign Targeting Russian Exiles?" (Cunningham):  ""Such a nefarious British program is by no means unprecedented".

"Three Good Reasons to Liquidate Our Empire" (Johnson).  But what about Khazaria?  What about the shekels?

"This great liberal switch from skepticism to sanctimony about the most powerful arms of the Establishment is matched by a viral fear of Russia that reminds me of the John Birch Society pamphlets I’d come across now and then when I was young. Somehow, instinct told me then that they were crazy, exaggerating the cunning of the enemy, the depravity of the collaborators, and the vulnerability of America. The liberal comedians who lampooned such claims on shows such as Laugh-In were my idols. They dared to speak the most radical truth of all in a time of panic and paranoia: the sneakiest adversary is the mind. The Cold War was real, of course, and deadly serious, as are the tensions with Putin’s Russia, but my liberal heroes of the Seventies discerned other dangers that were closer to home. Rigidity. Stridency. Shrillness. Self-righteousness. One way they answered the period’s harsh conservatism was to hang loose, not get uptight. Love, not war. Remember?"

"20 Things to Remember About Russia’s Takeover of the USA…" (Fikre).

"La santé publique de Montréal réclame à son tour la décriminalisation de toutes les drogues".  Curious, as Montreal is the base for most multinational drug companies in Canada, and their lobbyists, who are of course vehemently opposed to the competition posed by legalization.  "TOWHEY: Toronto’s Medical Officer doctors up support for legal drugs" (from the comical tabloid, The Sun).  "Is Canada on the Verge of Decriminalizing Drugs?" (Vember)  There is a fear that marijuana legalization is going to have terrible effect on the oxy market, a holocaust for Sackler profits.

"Palestinians celebrate release of Ahed Tamimi".

Sunday, July 29, 2018

Murky details

"Britain’s Jewish Press are Revolting" (Greenhalgh).  "Coordinated Amplified In-Your-Face Jewing" (Tanstaafl). On Hodge:  "Labour’s Gas-Chamber Blues: Pink Berets vs “F***ing Anti-Semites”" (Langson).  "Bogus anti-Semitism campaign against Corbyn and the “left” escalates" (Shaoul/Marsden).  Given the blatant ridiculousness of the attack, and the highly coordinated nature of the PR, it is impossible to maintain the usual Weissian line that this doesn't represent the views of the wider Jewish community.

Just in terms of pure political tactics, these Khazar attacks on Corbyn are difficult to understand.  Why do they think they'll succeed now when they've failed on so many other attempts?  Corbyn is immune to the usual financial blandishments, and refuses to kowtow to the 'donor' model, so they lack their usual weapons.  He's strengthened with each wave of attacks, and they can't expect any sympathy when he is Prime Minister.  Their failure to give up is a sign of pure desperation

(((Somebody))) is up to the usual trick, trying to have something happen by setting it up as a fait accompli:  "US Preparing To Bomb Iran's Nuclear Capabilities As Soon As Next Month: Report" (Durden).  Mattis walked it back immediately, demonstrating that even the hint of such talk is damaging to the Powers That Be.

"Russia Swats Away Israeli Bluster on Syria" (Bhadrakumar):
"Damascus is now turning attention to the liberation of the northwestern province of Idlib. It will be a major confrontation due to the presence of a large number of foreign terrorists in Northwestern Syria. The Iranian media reported that a Russian flag ship Ro-Ro Sparta was spotted crossing the Bosporus en route to Syria’s Tartus, carrying military cargo mostly ammunition, shells and missiles and that the reinforcements are meant for the Syrian Army’s “upcoming assault” on Idlib province."
Particularly clownish effort by Margolis, decimated by its first comment by bob sykes:  "The Looming War Against Iran".  The Iranians are fully aware of what another Assholian carpet bombing campaign could do to them, and thus have pre-planned extensive Revolutionary Guard operations all along the coast of the Straits.  These will continue even if there is no functioning government in Tehran, and there is no practical way to stop them.  All they have to do is sink one oil tanker, doable in a very low tech operation.  I've been saying for years in the face of 'Iran Talk' that a war on Iran is impossible, and it is still impossible, no matter how many shekels rain down on American politicians.  The Deep State would immediately assassinate any American politician who took the shekels and effectively decided to ruin that much wealth all at once.

"Painting a false picture" (Such) (review of "The Wrong Story: Palestine, Israel and the Media" by Greg Shupak).  "Israel’s Crimes Against Humanity, Videos they Don’t want you to see".  I note that most of this stuff is within the bounds of 'controlled opposition' (e.g., Noam!), and they don't mind our seeing it at all (much of it on the heavily policed YouTube, which should tell you a lot!).

"Saudi Arabia Teams Up with the UK to Kill Off Al Jazeera" (Dorsey) (like the Fox link of the other day, and a new trend, is that you may not be able to click on the link and have it open as a hyperlink, but may have to copy and paste the url in a new window).  It seems this was a main reason behind the Saudi/UAE attack on Qatar.  The other reason was a doctrinal issue of whether the Muslim Brotherhood and its operations should be supported - the Qataris said yes, but the Saudis really fear that it is a MB uprising which will end with the princely heads on pikes.

"A Look at Saudi Arabia: Barometer of World Evil" (Butler).

"The Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA Are in Charge" (Hornberger).

What makes Assholians proud!: tweet (Murad Gazdiev):
"Imagine if the Russian military posted something like this."
"China Days Away From Test-Firing Russian S-400 Missile Defense System: Tass" (Durden).

Odd:  "NSA has yet to fix security holes that helped Snowden leaks".

"'Western' Press Dislikes Imran Khan's Win In Pakistan's Election" (Moon).  Best endorsement you can get!

"The social and political background to the forest fire disaster in Greece" (Selin):
"While no statements have been made about the motives and causes of arson, many observers suspect land speculation. In Greek regions that promise lucrative profits through the sale of real estate, fires are started time and again, to later build illegally on the burnt-out former forestland. This criminal practice has been possible for years because politicians and the authorities take no action against it, but, on the contrary, retrospectively legalize the repurposing of forestland as building land. The fact that Greece has no national forestry register and the ownership of the land is often not clear plays into the hands of the real estate mafia. The Syriza government has also not changed these conditions. The business with fire makes room for the many private investors—which Syriza woos at every opportunity.

. . .

This also affects the fire department. Before the onset of the economic crisis in 2009, the Greek fire service had an annual budget of 452 million euros. By 2017, this had been cut by more than 20 percent to 354 million. The media report a lack of protective clothing, faulty breathing apparatus and outdated and often unusable fire trucks and fire fighting planes."

Blatant deception:  "Twitter Disavows Shadow Banning, But Facts Say Otherwise".  Caught red-handed on your secret program - well, naturally, you lie about it.

More questions that won't be answered:  "The Salisbury Poisonings: 10 Questions for the Authorities to Answer About Their Handling of This Case" (Slane).

"Carter Page Pressed on CIA Links and Says a Jew Invited Him to Speak in Russia" (Rogers).  Shlomo, no less:
"So long story short, Page was hastily and curiously invited to speak at a high profile event in Russia by a Jew who spent a significant part of his life in Israel. Page’s speaking engagement was then referenced within the #pissgate dossier. The speech allowed Steele to claim that Page had met with various Russian government officials while he was in Moscow. And this was a big part of what the FBI used to request the warrant to spy on Page and by proxy the Trump campaign as a whole.

I would say that all of this makes the theories about Page being a CIA asset planted inside the Trump campaign even more credible. It certainly helps explain why he hasn’t been arrested and why he keeps talking to the media. And of course, it also shows more Jewish involvement in this Trump-Russia hoax circus."
Unlikely hero news, part of a series from The Clarification:  "Liberals Leap to Defend Neo-Con Henchman McFaul" (Cartalucci).

"Judge Forces Fusion GPS To Disclose Murky Details Behind Steele Dossier" (Durden).  This could end up being quite important.

After much unnecessary death, the Syrian Kurds are slowly coming to their senses:  "Kurdish delegation in Damascus for peace talks" and "Kurds reach deal with Damascus to end Syria conflict" and "US-backed Syrian Kurds agree to 'roadmap' with Assad government".  Neither the Americans nor Israelis can help them in the stark choice between being slaughtered by the Turks and seeking some protection within the Syrian state.  This is important as these 'militants' have been working for the Americans on Yinonization of Syria.

"Vanessa Beeley: White Helmets are Israel’s terrorist organs" (Alexis).

The Great Shiksa Pogrom continues (with thanks to Farrow for his usual excellent work):  "The New Yorker Piece On Les Moonves Came Out, Wife Julie Chen Is Defending Him" (Harvey).

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Something wicked this way comes

"The West’s Fury and Bitterness About Russia’s Successes" (Cloughley).  "Bill Maher Leads Attack on Larry Wilkerson over Trump Meeting with Putin".  If somebody had told me ten years ago that the American 'left' would be freaking out over peace summits with Russia based on wild unproven conspiracy theories promulgated by Ukrainian intelligence, I'd have told them they were crazy.

Related warmongering by the (((media))):  "How the Media Wove a Narrative of North Korean Nuclear Deception" (Porter).

"The Jewish Ethnic Nexus of Bill Browder’ Financial Operations" (MacDonald) (see also the on-point amazing Shamir article which lists the Jewish matrix in which Browder and his ilk operate; note how Browder's business partners all end up dead in mysterious circumstances).  Tweet (Kevin MacDonald):
"What makes Browder so powerful? He invests in politicians. This is probably a uniquely Jewish quality: Jews outspend everybody in contributions to political figures."
"Guardians of the Magnitsky Myth" (Parry, from the archives):
". . . we’re fed a steady diet of the frothy myth whipped up by hedge-fund investor William Browder and sold to the U.S. and European governments as the basis for sanctioning Russian officials. For years now, Browder has been given a free hand to spin his dog-ate-my-homework explanation about how some of his firms got involved a $230 million tax fraud in Russia.
Browder insists that some “corrupt” Russian police officers stole his companies’ corporate seals and masterminded a convoluted conspiracy. But why anyone would trust a hedge-fund operator who got rich exploiting Russia’s loose business standards is hard to comprehend.
The answer is that Browder has used his money and political influence to scare off and silence anyone who dares point to the glaring contradictions and logical gaps in his elaborate confection.
So, the hedge-fund guy who renounced his U.S. citizenship in favor of a British passport gets the royal treatment whenever he runs to Congress. His narrative just fits so neatly into the demonization of Russia and the frenzy over stopping “Russian propaganda and disinformation” by whatever means necessary.
This summer, Browder testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee and argued that people involved in arranging the one-time showing of Nekrasov’s documentary should be prosecuted for violating the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which carries a five-year prison term.
Meanwhile, the U.S. mainstream media helps reinforce Browder’s dubious tale by smearing anyone who dares question it as a “Moscow stooge” or a “useful idiot.”
The Magnitsky controversy now has merged with the Russia-gate affair because Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who traveled to America to challenge Browder’s account, arranged a meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and other Trump campaign advisers in June 2016 to present this other side of the story.
Though nothing apparently came from that meeting, The New York Times, which always treats Browder’s account as flat fact, led its Saturday editions with a breathless story entitled, “A Kremlin Link to a Memo Taken to Trump Tower,” citing similarities between Veselnitskaya’s memo on the Magnitsky case and an account prepared by “one of Russia’s most powerful officials, the prosecutor general Yuri Y. Chaika.” Cue the spooky music as the Times challenges Veselnitskaya’s honesty.
Yet, the Times article bows to Browder as the ultimate truth-teller, including repetition of his assertion that Sergei Magnitsky was a whistleblowing “tax lawyer,” rather than one of Browder’s accountants implicated in the tax fraud.
While Magnitsky’s profession may seem like a small detail, it gets to the heart of the mainstream media’s acceptance of Browder’s depiction of Magnitsky – as a crusading lawyer who died of medical neglect in a Russian prison – despite overwhelming evidence that Magnitsky was really a clever accountant caught up in the scheme.
The “lawyer” falsehood – so eagerly swallowed by the Times and other mainstream outlets – also bears on Browder’s overall credibility: If he is lying about Magnitsky’s profession, why should anyone believe his other self-serving claims?"
The utter moral and journalistic decline of Who.What.Why.:  "Putin’s Indecent Proposal" (Schechtman).  'Journalism' in the United States now is interviewing gangsters and taking all their already disproved self-serving allegations as fact, with nary a question.  Shameful!

"Important insight into Assholian regime change operations: "U.S. government plays games with top Venezuelan officials" (Ordoñez):
"The decision not to sanction Cabello for more than a year while others around him suffered penalites mystified officials in Washington and Venezuela. And some began to wonder whether Cabello was talking to the United States, or even acting as a CIA agent."
They are quite proud of themselves over how clever they are, but the bottom line is that their trickery didn't work.

"Can Iran Circumvent U.S. Sanctions?" (Meliksetian).  A rather pointed shift in China to replace American oil with Iranian.

The classic Khazar (((media))) technique of announcing what it wants to happen as a fait accompli, then using news reports to attempt to change the facts on the ground:  "Syria - For The Third Time Israel Falsely Claims Iran Pull-Back Deal With Russia" (Moon).  "Assad: “Israel Has exhausted Our Patience and Iran Will Stay in Syria as Long as Is Needed”" (Magnier).  "Breaking: The Hunt for Assad Begins, as Israel Presses War Crime Charges".

"Syria: The White Helmets' Final Performance" (Cartalucci).  Having Israel exfiltrate them is a little too on point, don't you think?  "White Helmets coming ‘home’: West & Israel provide ‘exceptional’ rescue strategy for NATO's ghosts" (Beeley).  "White Helmets: Something wicked is coming our way" (Stilwater).  I can't wait for the first human organ restaurant to open in the suburbs of Toronto.

"Why Russia Wouldn’t Offer Iran to Israel & the US" (Sheikh).  Russia, a country which has recently suffered a serious terrorist war on its own territory and which is still subject to numerous terrorist attacks, regards terrorism as an existential threat, and ISIS as the point of that threat, and, unlike the Americans, who use terrorists as proxy armies, takes the War On Terror seriously, and not just a cover for Zionist machinations.

The underlying assumptions are all Zionist:  "The World According to Ben Rhodes: Hypocrisy in Obama’s Foreign Policy" (Angry Arab).

"Why the poet Dareen Tatour was convicted of incitement" (Haifawi).  This would be an amazing tale of the War On Poetry if it were anywhere else than Khazaria, where it's just another day.

"After military failure, Saudi ant allies resort to diplomacy on Yemen’s Hudaydah".  They were supposed to have just rolled into Yemen and taken over, but those Houthis can really fight.  "Houthi fighters attack Saudi ship off Yemen's coast" (history repeats).  The 'liberal' American 'news'!:  "ACTION ALERT: It’s Been Over a Year Since MSNBC Has Mentioned US War in Yemen" (Johnson):
"What seems most likely is MSNBC has found that attacking Russia from the right on matters of foreign policy is the most elegant way to preserve its “progressive” image while still serving traditional centers of power—namely, the Democratic Party establishment, corporate sponsors, and their own revolving door of ex-spook and military contractor-funded talking heads (3/26/18). After all, Obama backed the war on Yemen—though not nearly as aggressively as Trump has—and it’s difficult to make a coherent left-wing, anti-war criticism when the current Republican in office is simply carrying out your guy’s policy, but on steroids."
"Washington Post Jewess Ruth Marcus Confirms That the Daily Stormer is “Big Time” Media" (Rogers).

Friday, July 27, 2018


"Still Don’t Believe in Russian Collusion? Let Me Give You a Few Facts, Friendo." (Anglin).  The Clintonista narrative ship constantly almost runs aground on the shoals of real evidence of real political interference, and the skillful (((media))) pilots deal with this by changing the subject and moving on to the latest exciting allegations.

Also, useful compendium of evidence of falls, fits, doubles, etc.:  "HILLARY CLINTON: “Help, I’ve Fallen And I Can’t Get Up!”" (Riviera).

Just kidding

By popular demand, the new trend in 'jokes' from a particular group:
  1. "Sarah Silverman latest star answering for old child molestation jokes";
  2. "Director James Gunn Fired from Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 Over Pedo Tweets" (Sol);
  3. "David Cole On James Gunn" (Sailer) - unusually, there were repercussions in this case, possibly because he isn't purebred Khazar;
  4. "Hollywood Jew Seth Green Accused of Pedophilia by Hollywood Jew Isaac Kappy" (Sol);
  5. "Is the Unfunny Jewish Comedian Michael Ian Black a Homosexual Pedophile?" (Anglin);
  6. "Blind Item #14" (CDaN; guesses are Dan Harmon); and
  7. "Roseanne, Dan Harmon and the End of Hollywood’s Twitter Era (Column)" (D'Addario) - the problem is posed as too much publicity for private thoughts, with the solution  to stop posting them on social media.
It understand the concept that comedians get laughs out of being edgy and breaking taboos, but almost none of these attempts at jokes are even remotely funny.  To be fair to them, to some extent this seems to be the kind of dark humor one needs to cope when immersed in the world of pedophilia that is 'Hollywood'.

Thursday, July 26, 2018


"The plot thins: How gel became a liquid and the whole Novichok affair began to smell to high heaven" (Galloway):
 "I myself spoke to a senior British Army officer at a black-tie event in London last week. There were hundreds of them there, so I'm not giving his identity away. He asked me, who did I really think was responsible for the 'Novichok' affair?

"Russian criminals," I answered.

"Not the Russian state then?" he pressed.

"They are the least likely suspects,"
I said.

At which point this heavily decorated soldier leant over and whispered in my ear, "It was Ukraine."

He offered no evidence, I should say, and – but for his rank and position – I wouldn't even bother relaying it. But that is what he said."
"The Silence of the Whores" (Murray):
"What Rowley does say in the interview is that the box was still sealed in its cellophane. Presumably it was the cellophane he slit open with a knife.

So how can this fit in to the official government account? Presumably the claim is that Russian agents secretly visited the Skripal house, sprayed novichok on the door handle from this perfume bottle, and then, at an unknown location, disassembled the nozzle from the bottle (Mr Rowley said he had to insert it), then repackaged and re-cellophaned the bottle prior to simply leaving it to be discovered somewhere – presumably somewhere indoors as it still looked new – by Mr Rowley four months later. However it had not been found by anyone else in the interim four months of police, military and security service search."
I guess you've been reading about Syrian/Russian atrocities in the de-terrorization operations in the south of Syria.  "Syrian City Rocked By Deadliest Terror Attack In The Last Two Years" (Durden).  "Monitor: Recent US-Led Airstrikes Kill at Least 73 Syrian Civilians" (Wilkins).

"#BreakingSyria: Mass Graves in Raqqa".  Note that this story is from the Atlantic Council (HRW is, naturally, also in on this scam), presumably in aid of a neocon argument that American troops have to remain in Syria to fight the evil ISIS.  Of course, they don't mention that the Americans flattened Raqqa, ostensibly fighting ISIS! The 'technical constraints in the city' are that it is a pile of rubble.

"High Crimes and Misdemeanors – Not by Trump but Obama and Democrats" (Baraka).

"Mike Krieger Asks "Are Establishment Democrats Trying to Lose?"" They are not trying to lose, they just don't care if they win or lose as long as the money keeps flowing in.  Note that it isn't the policies of Sanders that bothers them, it is his disruption of the 'donor' model (he finances entirely from small donations from human beings, the horror!), and the loss of those sweet, sweet shekels.  You might wonder why the 'donors' keep throwing money into a losing cause?  The answer is that the result of the election is irrelevant to them as long as their 'one issue' is addressed in a satisfactory way, so the entire American electoral system can be run as a distraction to cover for the fact that they only care about the 'one issue'.

A reminder that techdirt is fundamentally with the bad guys, as it constantly slips in obvious Deep State PR while ostensibly working to promote freedom of speech and other good things:  "Wikileaks Refused To Publish Manafort Family Texts, So Someone Else Did". The documents were already on the internet and were from Manafort's daughter, so this is just a pot shot at Assange at a vulnerable time.  They should be ashamed of themselves.  Don't ever trust these people!!!

"Which Is More Occupied, Crimea or Afghanistan?" (Swanson).

"Entering a 1984 World, Trump-Style" (Klare):
". . . it’s a mistake to assume that Trump lacks a coherent foreign-policy blueprint. In fact, an examination of his campaign speeches and his actions since entering the Oval Office — including his appearance with Putin — reflect his adherence to a core strategic concept: the urge to establish a tripolar world order, one that was, curiously enough, first envisioned by Russian and Chinese leaders in 1997 and one that they have relentlessly pursued ever since.

Such a tripolar order — in which Russia, China, and the U.S. would each assume responsibility for maintaining stability within their own respective spheres of influence while cooperating to resolve disputes wherever those spheres overlap — breaks radically with the end-of-the-Cold-War paradigm. During those heady years, the United States was the dominant world power and lorded it over most of the rest of the planet with the aid of its loyal NATO allies.

For Russian and Chinese leaders, such a “unipolar” system was considered anathema. After all, it granted the United States a hegemonic role in world affairs while denying them what they considered their rightful place as America’s equals. Not surprisingly, destroying such a system and replacing it with a tripolar one has been their strategic objective since the late 1990s — and now an American president has zealously embraced that disruptive project as his own."
"The big question in all this, of course, is: Why? Why would an American president seek to demolish a global order in which the United States was the dominant player and enjoyed the support of so many loyal and wealthy allies? Why would he want to replace it with one in which it would be but one of three regional heavyweights?

Undoubtedly, historians will debate this question for decades. The obvious answer, offered by so many pundits, is that he doesn’t actually know what he’s doing, that it’s all thoughtless and impulsive. But there’s another possible answer: that he intuits in the Sino-Russian template a model that the United States could emulate to its benefit.

In the Trumpian mindset, this country had become weak and overextended because of its uncritical adherence to the governing precepts of the liberal international order, which called for the U.S. to assume the task of policing the world while granting its allies economic and trade advantages in return for their loyalty. Such an assessment, whether accurate or not, certainly jibes well with the narrative of victimization that so transfixed his core constituency in rustbelt areas of Middle America. It also suggests that an inherited burden could now be discarded, allowing for the emergence of a less-encumbered, stronger America — much as a stronger Russia has emerged in this century from the wreckage of the Soviet Union and a stronger China from the wreckage of Maoism. This reinvigorated country would still, of course, have to compete with those other two powers, but from a far stronger position, being able to devote all its resources to economic growth and self-protection without the obligation of defending half of the rest of the world."
The **Khough** (((media))) senses the danger to their precious Wars For The Jews - Helsinki summit editorial cartoons from the US.

"Maria Butina" (West). She seems to be unlucky enough to be caught up in Mueller's dog and pony show in aid of proving he is actually doing something, but is there more to the story than the need for a demonstration scape-goat?  West raises some wild bigger conspiracy issues (Doug Coe!!! - I love the old-school stuff!), putting this move in the contexts of both the Never-Trump, and Russian anti-Putin neoliberal, movements.

"Escobar: "Tweet Of Mass Destruction" Ratchets Up Tension On Iran":
"It’s always possible that Trump’s all-caps spectacular may be a ruse to distract Americans from the Helsinki “treason” scandal. That gets traction when associated to the looming mid-term elections and Trump’s absolute need to sound tough and keep the Republicans in line. Call it a brilliant Trump strategic maneuver. Or was it Putin’s?
Back to reality, the stark options would come down to either Iran becoming a US satellite or closing the Strait of Hormuz – something that for all practical purposes would collapse the global economy.
I have been assured that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has the technological means to block the Strait and would not flinch to go for it rather than yield, if the going gets tough. President Rouhani cannot resist the IRGC. The Trump administration has, in fact, forced Rouhani to show his cards. All branches of the Iranian government are now united.
War hysteria, already on, is extremely irresponsible. In the worst Strait of Hormuz scenario, the US Navy would be impotent, as Russian-made SS-N-22 Sunburn missiles could wreak havoc. Washington could only bomb from Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar or Incirlik in Turkey. Neither Qatar nor Turkey is inclined to antagonize Iran.
The Pentagon would have to bomb coastal missile sites on Iran’s Persian Gulf shoreline. But these are heavily camouflaged; missiles are portable, and there’s no reliable on the ground intel. Iran only needs to fire one missile at a time. No oil tanker would possibly try to get through.
Things don’t even need to degrade towards a shooting war. All Tehran needs to do is to make the threat credible. Insurance companies would stop insuring oil carriers. No oil carrier will navigate without insurance."
"Twitter Responds To Conservative Outrage As VICE Confirms "Shadow Ban" Reports" (Durden).  "PayPal censors journalists who criticize Israel" (Abunimah).

"An independent journalist in Eritrea" (Mountain).  MbZ wants to replace his military presence in Somalia!:  "Former rivals hail UAE's role in bringing peace between Ethiopia and Eritrea".  Egypt, not a dam lover!:  "Engineer of Ethiopia's Grand Renaissance Dam found dead".

"The Case for Stripping Former Officials of their Security Clearances" (Kiriakou):
"I’ve known John Brennan for 30 years. He was my boss in the CIA’s Directorate of Intelligence decades ago. John was hard to get along with. His superiors generally didn’t like him. He was once fired from a job at the CIA. He’s not particularly bright. And then he found a patron in former CIA director George Tenet, who saved his career. Brennan has had his run. He succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. He’s been CIA Director, deputy National Security Advisor, director of the Transnational Terrorism Information Center, and deputy Executive Director of the CIA. That’s pretty heady stuff for a kid from Bergen, New Jersey.

He also has very low self-esteem from those early days at the CIA. Almost everybody else had more degrees, spoke more languages, and went to better schools. Until Tenet, Brennan never had a political rabbi and was stuck at the GS-15 (journeyman) level for years. Now, all these years later, he again doesn’t have anyone to help his career. Barack Obama isn’t president anymore. And Brennan desperately wants to be Secretary of Defense. He says it to anybody willing to listen. That is what’s supposed to be his legacy, at least in his mind.

Besides legacy, Brennan and the others have cashed in on their government service. They’ve all become rich by sitting on corporate boards. Brennan is on the board of directors of a company called SecureAuth + CORE Security. He also serves on the board of The Analysis Corporation, which he helped found before joining the Obama Administration. Finally, and most importantly, Brennan is now the official talking head and “Intelligence Consultant” for NBC News and MSNBC.

To me, this is the point that is the most obviously wrong. How is it that former officials who now have no role in government are able to keep their active security clearances? This has abuse written all over it. First, these officials run the risk of exposing classified information in a television interview, either inadvertently or not. Second, and more cynically, what is to keep them from propagandizing the American people by simply spouting the CIA line or allowing the CIA to use them to put out disinformation? What’s to keep them from propagandizing the American people by selectively leaking information known only to the intelligence agencies and Congress? Or to release information passed to them by the FBI?

No former intelligence officials should have a security clearance. There’s no purpose for it other than propaganda and personal enrichment. And if Brennan or Hayden or Clapper or any other former intelligence official becomes an employee of a media company, he or she should not have a security clearance. Period. Donald Trump ought to act right now."
Madsen is often clearly on the wrong side of issues, and more so recently. It seems obvious that security clearances should automatically end with the end of the job for which the clearances are given.  Making money off them is grifting. 

Tweeting while woke (Glen type guy):
"They don't NEED your "help"
Go give a speech in front of Adelson for a quick hundred grand
GTFO Emperor"
"Did an innocent man die in prison for a murder committed by the East Area Rapist?"

Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Complicated past

"Fusion GPS Had Major Doubts About "Pee Tape" Dossier Source, Included Anyway" (Durden) (also:  "no there there"):
"Another approach used to beef up the FISA application's curb appeal was circular evidence, via the inclusion of a letter from Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (NV) to former FBI Director James Comey, citing information Reid got from John Brennan, which was in turn from the Clinton-funded dossier."
"The Three Stooges and the Ultimate Deal™" (Karmi). It is not clear to me that the Ultimate Deal™ is dead or if this is part of the show business of President Jared making a big splash when he reveals their fate to the Palestinians in September, when the political season kicks up again and he can receive his accolades from the (((media))) as a macher.  It is possible that recent Palestinian resistance has emboldened some of the non-Jewish Arab states - Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Algeria? - to refuse to sign off on the MbZ/MbS scheming.

Note how the Official Story is that he was not on any 'radars', which I guess is technically true, but as you read on about his background your jaw drops farther and farther!:  "Who was the Danforth shooter? Faisal Hussain had no criminal court files associated with his name, but a complicated past full of family misfortune".  'Complicated past'!

Normally, the PR/defense attorney advice would be to keep a low profile and get out of Dodge, but she, with the arrogance of inherited gangster money, decided to double down:  "Clare Bronfman, Seagram's heiress, among 6 arrested in NXIVM case".  It is unusual to see a court filing from the office of a prominent district attorney look so much like a conspiracy theory from 4chan or Reddit (of course, 4chan and Reddit have helpfully added such terms as pizzagate, 'James Alefantis', Podesta, Huma, Rothschild, and Hillary Clinton to the mix!).

"The Disco Triplets" (Sailer).  Sailer, who prides himself on 'noticing' what it is politically incorrect to notice, doesn't notice the most important thing about scientific racism, that it is a 'debate' within small cliques of group supremacists with a particular interest in the conclusion, although he comes close:
"Sadly, the triplets were split up for the first nineteen years of their lives by an expensive covert study sponsored by the Jewish Board of Family and Children Services, the largest not-for-profit in New York City. In 1961, the Jewish Board was hoping to prove the orthodox Freudian dogma that family dynamics outweigh genes in determining personality.
In nature-nurture debates, twins separated shortly after birth are the holy grail of research subjects. But it’s of course considered grossly unethical for researchers to split siblings, so they must look for twins who were already apart, sometimes reuniting them.
Scientists who lean toward nature over nurture are frequently denounced as nearly Nazis. So it’s interesting that the only known experimenters to actively separate twins were ardent nurturists.
According to a now-elderly research assistant interviewed in the film, the most obvious yet least expected fact that leaped out at the Jewish Board’s interviewers was that separated twins, despite their quite different family dynamics, behaved extraordinarily alike.
By 1980, fortunately, the winds were blowing against this high-handed experiment in which the adoptive parents were never even informed that their new children were not singletons.
Nor was the Freudian assumption that twins should be split up for the good of each child confirmed by less manipulative retrospective studies of reunited twins. Thomas J. Bouchard began his now-famous Minnesota twins study in 1979 and quickly learned that reunited twins generally loved being back together.
So the Jewish Board shut down the experiment around the time the triplets surfaced in the press. They locked up the data that had been collected weekly on the triplets and also on (approximately) five pairs of twins, all separated shortly after birth by the Louise Wise adoption agency, which was affiliated with the Jewish Board. (The whole affair remains so cloaked that we still don’t even know exactly how many children were used in the experiment.) No report was ever published, and the records wound up at Yale under seal until 2066.
Fortunately, a title card at the end of the film announces that, due to all the adverse publicity, the records are finally being released to the now-middle-aged subjects.
In 1980, the six adoptive parents tried to sue the deep-pocketed not-for-profit for withholding from them that their sons were triplets. It’s not explained in the movie, but I imagine the parents’ legal argument would have been not that they would have given up their sons, but that if informed, they would have made sure that the triplets got together regularly. They all lived in greater New York, so they could have spent time at one another’s houses growing up, just as they did upon reunification.
The parents contacted various lawyers, who were initially enthusiastic. But all the law firms eventually refused to take the case after discovering that none of their Jewish lawyers would ever be allowed to adopt a Jewish baby from Louise Wise.
By the way, the film’s unsympathetic, almost conspiratorial portrayal of the politically well-connected Jewish Board is a rare depiction of Jewish institutional power that doesn’t try to find some way to blame any misbehavior on the gentiles."
Sailer goes on to righteously criticize Freudianism, seemingly unaware that the same type of criticism would apply to his own group of scientific racists.

Tweet (Eva Working CLASS):
" Did everyone know that Novichok smelled like perfume? Charlie opened the bottle spilled some on his hands THEN, after he screwed in the applicator, Dawn sprayed it on herself even though it wasn't perfume. They then hid the bottle?"
As usual, the more you elaborate and attempt to explain a lie, the sillier it gets.  We can't blame him - if he attempts to tell the truth they'll tell us his health took a sudden turn and he unfortunately died.

"To Make a Sailor Blush" (Gilbert).  I think they misread this.  Corbyn's 'gas the Kikes' program is going to be the strongest campaign run by a British politician in years, and by taking these blows he creates the platform without having to say anything.  We're in a period of history where stating the truth is impossible, so we have to be more clever in expressing ourselves.

Too much to blog about - I give up!

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

There for the taking

"Violent Coup Fails in Nicaragua, U.S. Continues Regime Change Efforts" (Zeese).  People around the world are woke, and as much as they may have justifiable concerns, can now see that the Soros alternative - see Ukraine or Syria for a hint - is much, much, much worse than any conceivable worst-case future within the confines of legitimate political structures.  In contrast, the counter-constitutional color revolution going on in the United States has not failed, as the Americans, not yet fully woke, lack an antidote for their own poison. 

You might hope that failure of the Democrats in the upcoming midterms would send a clear message, but the Democrats won't hear it.  Americans face an unprecedented situation where the alternative party has essentially given up on electoral success in order to fully enjoy the proceeds of the 'donor' model.  It is not uncommon for left or far left parties to run in elections with no hope of success, to send a message or attempt to subtly influence the terms of the debate.  Communists run decade after decade with much less than 1% of the vote.  It is amazing when a political party that is supposed to win about half the time decides that it no longer wants to win if it would affect the volume of graft it might receive.

To reiterate, the 'donor' model is the dominance in political campaign financing by Khazar billionaires.  The mechanics is to funnel most of the money through Khazar owned (((media))) outlets, regarded by the (((experts))) as a necessary part of winning American elections, despite the fact that the Trump campaign went a long way to disproving it.  There is so much money sloshing around, billions and billions (but with little or no net cost to the Khazars, who recover most of it back in ((( media))) profits), that a considerable amount falls to the small army of political back room operators and (((media))) 'experts' and pundits, not to mention various identity politics 'activists', who control what political parties do.

The Khazars are all 'one issue guys', which means the 'donors' to both parties expect complete fealty to the building of Greater Israel across the Middle East, and the consequent necessity for the US to fight constant Wars For The Jews, regardless of the cost, financially, morally, and psychically, to Americans.  This is no big problem for Republicans, who are supposed to be out fighting wars (well, it is now a bit of a problem, as we see with the never-Trumpers who continue to whine about Trump's forays into isolationism), and are supposed to be looking after the interests of billionaires, and also receive considerable money from gentile billionaires who have traditional class interests, but causes a big contradiction within the Democrats, who are predominantly funded by Khazar billionaires while obviously, and consequently, warmongering and aggressively failing to look out for working class people.  It is a particular problem now, with Putin's success in stabilizing Syria and pushing back Yinon, thus causing the 'donors' to be in a frenzy for scheming for WWIII for the regime change that would put Putin in his place.  The contradictions in the Democratic party are papered over almost entirely with various forms of identity politics, even as the increasingly bizarre avenues this leads down is causing the average voter to recoil (and who have noticed that identity politics is offered not in addition to concrete material benefits to average Americans, but in lieu of).  The fall-back position is Russiagate, which of course is loved by the 'donors' pushing for WWIII, but it is so palpably ridiculous - not to mention obscenely hypocritical, given constant American meddling, and worse, in elections all over the world, including Russia's - that it is not enough to support the dying Democrat brand, and in fact has started to backfire.

As the phony outrage over Trump's 'treason' ratchets up, and Americans slowly see the enormity of the Barry/IC attempted coup, Trump's polling also ratchets up, particularly with Republicans who are now motivated to vote to block the increasingly crazy-looking and actually treasonous Democrats.  Trump sees this and wants Putin to show up in Washington just before the midterms, in a kind of bizarre campaign rally.  Still, that 'donor' graft is so tempting to Democrat back rooms that it not worth giving it up to win an election, even one that is there for the taking.

Monday, July 23, 2018

Did not blink

It is funny how the phony Putin election interference claims hide the actual interference in the election process by the Obama Administration and the American IC.  "FISA Fraud by Obama's DOJ and Intel Community by Publius Tacitus".

Peter Strzok relies entirely on 'belief', a questionable source (Steele) who is both on the FBI's payroll (improperly, as he was a 'former' British agent), and the payroll of the Clinton campaign (having improbably passed on from Jeb!'s campaign), and articles from the media, as the sole sources for the FISA application.  The Clintonistas tell us this is kosher as there is a long footnote in the application on Steele:  "In Tweets, Trump Baselessly Asserts Carter Page FISA App Shows DOJ, FBI Misconduct".  It appears that somebody in the FBI added an addendum to one footnote in an extension request to more accurately reflect Steele's dealings with the media, but did not think it important to note that the footnote in the original request was misleading, so it is now clear that trying to get one by the courts using footnotes - a legalistic fine print tactic of shysters - really doesn't pass the smell test.  Generally, you are supposed to go out of your way to make the court as informed as possible, particularly in such a constitutionally obtrusive piece of legislation.  The credibility of Steele becomes a huge issue when the FBI is essentially vouching for his credibility to the judge:
"If you ever doubted that Peter Strzok and James Comey were corrupt, this one paragraph should erase any uncertainty. Steele had lied to the FBI about a substantive matter, i.e., passing information to the press. Why then should the FBI assume that he was not lying about Russia and Trump? Particularly since they had already acknowledged that Steele had other motives for going after Trump.

Despite acknowledging that Steele had lied and that he was the source for Isikoff's September article, the FBI continued to include the Isikoff material in its application to renew the FISA warrant. Strzok and Comey did not blink. Neither did DOJ Assistant Attorney General Sally Yates."
See also: "A Review of the DOJ/FBI FISA Application Release…" (sundance):
"The overall FISA application is ridiculously short on substance, and generally is a long way from providing the evidence needed for Title-1 surveillance authority over a U.S. person.  In fact, the FISA application is very sloppy… almost as if it wasn’t a priority to have a solid and defensible document.  I think there’s a simple reason for that.
After all, the DOJ and FBI never thought anyone would ever be looking at this issue; they thought Hillary Clinton was going to win. To quote the disposition of FBI Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”  Key word: “unlikely“, they never contemplated -until later- the full scope of justification that would be needed…. they were setting up something no-one really thought would need to be utilized…. all of the legal apoplexy and ass-covering came in hindsight.
So when we review the FISA application, it is worth reminding yourself this was a tool, a temporary means to an end, they never thought they would actually need…. so they didn’t spend a great deal of time hammering out the finer points.  The political surveillance was useful, but it was likely never to be known how it was utilized.  Ms. Lisa Page was focused on empowering Hillary Clinton, stupid -albeit useful and obnoxiously arrogant- Pete was in charge of the less-than and likely unneeded insurance."
sundance then delves into strange anomalies in the actual redacted release itself, almost as if they are trying to maximize the obfuscation even beyond the obvious blacked-out lines, and continues into various other problems/lies.  The conclusion is in the middle:
"Occam’s Razor: The FISA Title I surveillance authority over Carter Page was cover, most likely retroactive cover, for the DOJ and FBI conducting surveillance on the Trump campaign."
"Is Carter Page a CIA Spook?" (Rogers).  He's a known FBI informant (a 'cooperating asset' in an operation against a Russian spy!) - the contradiction in being an FBI informant while allegedly working for the Russians is noted by sundance - so it isn't much of a stretch to wonder if he was inserted into the Trump campaign as an American IC spy, with the FISA warrant just a way to get his activities recorded.

Sunday, July 22, 2018

Deranged elite

"Ecuador Will Imminently Withdraw Asylum for Julian Assange and Hand Him Over to the UK. What Comes Next?" (Greenwald).  If he can stay in Britain until the next British election (although you can count on May to try to whisk him away to the US with unseemly haste), and can avoid being shivved by the CIA while in British jail, Assange should be all right.

"John Brennan, Melting Down and Covering Up" (Van Buren).  An IC coup, and Brennan is the head of it.

"America On It's Way to Being Stalin's Soviet Union by Publius Tacitus".  She didn't attempt to hide anything as she couldn't imagine that she was doing anything wrong.

"Protesters haul fake pipeline to Parliament Hill as Trans Mountain deadline nears" (Ramlakhan).  "The U.S. and Canada Are Preparing for a New Standing Rock Over the Trans Mountain Tar Sands Pipeline" (Brown/Parrish).  People are going to have a different view of Trudeau when he brings in the army to start slaughtering native protesters.

"Ukraine Furious After Italy's Salvini Calls 2014 Revolution "Fake" And "Foreign-Funded"" (Durden).  It is amazing how really, really rare it is to hear a prominent politician state an obvious inarguable truth out loud!

"In Nicaragua, is Operation “Contra bis” failing?" (Anfruns).  Soros/CIA employees can only do so much without a wider support base, and color revolutions are now notorious enough that even people with legitimate concerns, if they are well meaning, are no longer falling into the trap.  There also seems to be an international protocol for governments under Soros attack to deal with the problem.

"Great Nations Are Destroyed by Being Pulled into Wars to Defend Tiny Ones" (Sieff).  Khough, Khough.  Small hint - the Assholians don't give a shit about Poland, Lithuania, Estonia or Latvia.

"One positive aspect of the new phase of Cold War is that before it was largely concealed, and deceived, as a simplistic bifurcated confrontation of Americans versus Russians. Today it is evidently a situation of an American deranged elite versus the rest of the world, with the latter including ordinary American citizens who have much more to gain from standing in solidarity with Russian citizens."

Only sane thing I've read about Russiagate:  "Robert Mueller Indicts Russian President Vladimir Putin for Sinking Missouri Duck Boat".

Saturday, July 21, 2018

Rights for Jews

"Did Alleged Russian Agent Fail Spy School?" (Baker).  Baker suffers from a sad terminal case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, so can't draw the obvious conclusion that she is not a spy, any more than an American professor posted to Moscow for a few years, and debriefed by the State Department on his return, is a spy.  It is standard operating procedure, accepted by all sane governments, for foreign offices to attempt to gather intelligence from their ex-pats.  See Roberts:  "The Arrest of Maria Butina Is Another Hoax".

"Forget Trump: The Military-Industrial Complex Is Still Running The Show With Russia" (Fein).  'Owning' an American President isn't doing Putin much good!

"Zuckerberg On Denial and Being Wrong" (Atzmon).  The important part is in the second half, noting that the JQ is always set up to be a 'debate' amongst factions of Khazars.  Goyim, I  . . .  An excellent example is the case of BDS, whose terms, as Atzmon has noted, have been subtly changed to pose no threat to a Khazar ethno-supremacist state in the Middle East.  The 'opposition' is always controlled.

Tweet (Alex Emmons) (for example, goyim, racial segregation in the US is 'rights for whites'):
"If you've ever wondered how today's media would cover openly segregationist laws, you have your answer. From this morning's @nytimes:"
"New assault on Corbyn aims to ban criticism of Israel in Labour" (Winstanley):
"A leading pro-Israel lawmaker is being investigated by the Labour Party for allegedly slandering Jeremy Corbyn as a “fucking anti-Semite,” The Electronic Intifada can reveal."
Note all the tweets defending her which lead with a Holocaust reference!  Anglin, from 2016, having some fun:  "Corbyn Wins, Vows to Build Gas Chambers and Immediately “Cleanse Britain of the Ratfaced Kike Filth”".  It is striking how vitally important Holocaust worship is in blocking these obvious traitors from being permanently and summarily kicked out of the party. They are not just traitors to the party, but to the entire country, as their clear intent, for their vile supremacist reasons, is to block Corbyn from being Prime Minister, thus making this a real-life current example of the kind of behavior that has gotten Khazars in trouble as long as they have existed in gentile countries!

"A Brief History Of US Covert Action In Syria - Part 1" and "A Brief History Of US Covert Action In Syria - Part 2" (Van Wagenen).  In these days of The Clarification, we shouldn't be surprised at where Assholia finds its allies.  Note that all of this occurred under the reign of the most progressive man who has ever lived, Barry the Good (not to mention Elegant).  I like how when Kim Kardashian complained about anti-Armenian genocide, some Khazars at the Daily Beast called her a "sex tape vixen/reality TV starlet/entrepreneur" and implied she is too much of a bimbo to have an informed opinion on geopolitics.  It is remarkable how easily they get away with that kind of slurring when the actual nature of the 'rebels' in a Yinonizing civil war is inconsistent with the Official Story.

See also "Elizabeth Tsurkov on the failings of Syria’s “rebels”" (Cobban). Who knew that human organ eaters and head loppers weren't popular with their victims?

"The False Prosecution of Dzhokhkar Tsarnaev" (Roberts).  Quoting from "THE PROSECUTION OF DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV IN THE BOSTON BOMBING CASE" by John Remington Graham:
"During the trial, after I had looked into the case, I wrote an opinion, stating that, in light of known FBI-gathered evidence, there was no probable cause to charge Dzhokhar. Drawing from fragments at the scene of the explosions, the FBI crime lab and the indictment against Mr. Tsarnaev, and also the major news media, stated that the culprits were carrying black backpacks, filled with heavy pressure cooker bombs, at the time of the explosions, yet Dzhokhar in particular who was charged, not to mention his deceased brother Tamerlan, was shown in a still-frame photo from a street surveillance video used by the FBI to identify the suspects, carrying a light-weight white or silvery bag over his right shoulder only minutes before the explosions. It so happens that there were widely published photos at the time, these still available, showing men in paramilitary gear, wearing black backpacks which perfectly matched the black backpacks projected by the FBI crime lab, but these individuals were not questioned by the FBI."
Unfortunately, he continues into 'crisis actor' musings which are unnecessary and don't help his case.  The key point is that the backpacks of the brothers, as seen on surveillance photos, were the wrong color, and not big enough to hold pressure cookers.

"Ecuador Reportedly Preparing To Hand Assange To UK In "Coming Weeks Or Days"" (Durden).  "Ecuador’s Agenda: Squeezing and Surrendering Assange" (Kampmark).  Is the delay due to fear of what might be in the file that will be released on Assange's arrest?  He'd be wise to have some stuff in there that would put Moreno in jail for the rest of his sorry life.  We can wax poetic about 'press freedom' and the true nature of journalism all we want, but people like Pompeo just don't care.  In fact, one of their main goals is to make sure true journalism is over by making an example of what happens to people like Assange.

Friday, July 20, 2018


"Trump is not Putin's puppet and here's why" (Dobrokhotov).  The European market for gas.  "“I think the European Union is a foe,” Trump says on eve of Putin summit" (Stewart):

"“Well, I think we have a lot of foes,” Trump said when asked by CBS Evening News anchor Jeff Glor about who he thinks America’s biggest foe is, globally, right now. “I think the European Union is a foe, what they do to us is in trade. Now, you wouldn’t think of the European Union, but they’re a foe. Russia is a foe in certain respects. China is a foe economically, certainly they are a foe. But that doesn’t mean they are bad. It doesn’t mean anything. It means that they are competitive.”"
When Trump says 'foe' he means commercial competitor, and he regards the job of the US President as working for the top American CEOs to improve their business prospects against foreigners.  He didn't really get anywhere with respect to Russian gas and Nord Stream 2 due to two problems.  First, his 'donors' want to keep NATO as a Zionist army but his central bankers are telling him he needs to start to cut military spending, with one way to do that to get Europe to chip in more for NATO, but coming on too strong on the NATO arm-twisting left him with no chips left to play on gas.  Secondly, European plans are too far along and too connected to Russia to do a 180 now.  A US gas play needed to start at least five to ten years ago, during the time Barry was swanning around spending all of his time as President basking in the glow of being Barry, with no time to worry about gas (to be fair, the fracking gas surpluses didn't exist a few years ago, but Barry's experts should have told him it was coming and he had to find a big place to lay off a lot of it).

The bottom line is that Trump isn't acting like Putin's puppet on the most important issue at hand, and if Putin has anything on Trump, it isn't working.

"Republican Senators Introduce Bill to Snuff out Europe’s Independence" (Gorka). It is fairly fucking outrageous - and a convincing indictment of the current American policy of conducting warfare by sanctions - to sanction somebody for not buying your inferior product!

"You've Heard the Hysteria About the Trump-Putin Summit. Now Consider the Facts." (Sirohi).

One way to understand US politics is that the 'donor' model works better for Republicans than Democrats, as it does not reveal massive contradictions in the Republican set of policy positions.  The McCarthyism of current Democrats is simply amazing (the phony outrage over McFaul reminds me of even earlier American history - 'Remember the Maine').

Thursday, July 19, 2018

I hope my peers have the moral courage, as I sure don't

"A walk on the wild side as Trump meets Putin at Finland station" (Escobar):
"Trump knew he had nothing to offer Putin to negotiate on Syria. The Syrian Arab Army (SAA) now controls virtually 90% of national territory. Russia is firmly established in the Eastern Mediterranean, especially after signing a 49-year agreement with Damascus.

Even considering careful mentions of Israel on both sides, Putin certainly did not agree to force Iran out of Syria.

No “grand bargain” on Iran seems to be in the cards. The top adviser to Ayatollah Khamenei, Ali Akbar Velayati, was in Moscow last week. The Moscow-Tehran entente cordiale seems unbreakable. In parallel, as Asia Times has learned, Bashar al-Assad has told Moscow he might even agree to Iran leaving Syria, but Israel would have to return the occupied Golan Heights." (!)
"Chomsky on the Trump NATO Ruse" (Falcone)  If his accurately depicts Noam ('bitch', please!), he has a remarkably unsophisticated view of Trump - on a level like that of Bill Kristol - compared to that of, say, Korybko or Escobar.

"Israel’s nukes, not Syria: Man kicked out from Trump-Putin summit says AP misquoted him".  The (((media))) started to make a big thing about this - that dictator Putin kicking a journalist out! - until it came out what he was going to ask!

The Clarification is becoming awfully clear:  "Trump’s Treasonous Traitor Summit or: How Liberals Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the New McCarthyism" (CJ Hopkins). It is difficult to imagine, but there was a time when this type of meeting would have been the cause of considerable celebration, particularly on the left.  Part of an accurate comment by bevin:
"Frum of course is actually from Canada, the son of a successful real estate speculator and, I believe, dentist. His mother was a CBC news ‘presenter.’ His sister if I am not mistaken is an appointed Senator. Naturally he has strong feelings about foreigners interfering in US elections."
"Israel passes controversial 'Jewish nation-state' law". The Rubicon, with no turning back. They can no longer claim to be a 'normal country', but have now irrevocably proclaimed themselves to be a racist supremacist state.  They should now have permanent 'outlaw' status.  As a bonus, defining themselves as 'Jewish' completely excludes the phony-conversos, the Khazars, just as it should be.

"Leaked Netanyahu Tape: We Made Trump Cancel The Iran Deal" (Durden).

"Russia Plans $50 Billion Investment In Iran's Oil, Gas Industry" (Paraskova).

Mueller's just another Washington grifter:  "I’m the Reporter Mentioned in Mueller’s Indictment. Why Hasn’t He Spoken to Me?" (Stranahan).  He was in a hurry to get this material out before Helsinki, so who cares about minor details like proper investigation or getting the facts right?

"Ocasio-Cortez “Evolves” Her Position on Palestine to Please Zionist Democratic Mega-Donors" (Webb).  'Donors'. The problem is that an inability to pass even this simple test is also a good indication of whether you are a real socialist or just another grasper in politics for the shekels.

"Las Vegas hotel seeks immunity from lawsuits by shooting victims".  The resent series of revelations that both the internal security and police gave Paddock, or whoever actually did the shooting, all the time he needed to do his job, makes this even more outrageous.  Trying to latch onto some Homeland Security exemption is particularly rich when you remember that the main purpose of the shooting was to build up the business of installing x-ray security machines in places like casinos and hotels, to prevent gun-toting 'terrorists' from committing similar massacres.

"Columnist’s Suspension Highlights Boston Globe’s Poor Marathon Bombing Coverage" (Henry). 'Journalists' don't get into trouble for making stuff up - the (((media))) accepts that as the job.  The problem here was the all important lack of authenticity, pretending to be 'one of the guys' on the front line when he was not.

Another unsolved murder, this one 25 years old, apparently solved using familial DNA:  "Raymond ‘DJ Freez’ Rowe arrested for 1992 killing of schoolteacher Christy Mirack".  There must be some nervousness in the community of murderers that, even if you have managed to stay 'out of the system', you might be caught based on the DNA traces left by your relatives who have had no reason to be shy about their DNA.

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

US - Russia - China

I'm starting to think the China hacking story is second stage US IC manipulation.  It suddenly pops up, both from Lang's IC source, and from Page (also IC), right after Trump gets back from Helsinki.  Anti-Trump derangement is at a fever pitch, with the usual suspects calling Trump no less than a traitor.  On the other hand, some analysts are stating that Trump is actually carrying out big American strategic plans, attempting to weaken China by separating Russia and China.

Korybko realized how it was going to play out months ago:  "What The US Really Wants From Russia".  This makes the New Cold War anti-Russia hysteria, expressed in large part through Trump Derangement Syndrome, just part of the larger exercise to soften Putin up to be receptive to some kind of American IC deal - you pull back from China, and we'll tone down our anti-Russian rhetoric/sanctions.  Trump is playing the uncharacteristic role of being the well-meaning diplomat, coming to Putin as a man hounded by his own IC, just like Putin, and with a deal that will get the hounders off both their backs at the same time.  Is the entire purpose of Trump Derangement Syndrome just to set Trump up as a better negotiator with Putin?

I note that this analysis makes the whole Pissgate/Russiagate/Steele/'hacking' story just Washington political theater that nobody of importance takes seriously.  It is a way to prepare Trump to advance American interests.  It is winding down as it has served its greater American purpose (but a 180 degree shift to blaming the 'hacking' on China is a breathtaking demonstration of the low regard which the American IC has of Americans!).  Note that Trump-as-traitor is not intended to weaken Trump's hand, it is intended to strengthen it.

"The Coming American-Russian Alliance Against China" (Kazianis).

"Helsinki Talks - How Trump Tries To Rebalance The Global Triangle" (Moon).

Entous, an obvious US IC asset, was the vehicle by which the Russia approach was greased into the American consciousness, putting the whole idea, improbably, on MbZ.

Note how Israel finds itself in the odd place of being a cog in the US-Russia understanding due to the dramatic backfiring of Yinon, and the sudden realization that it can't win a three-front war.  "It’s Official, “Israel” Is Now a Joint Russian-American Protectorate" (Korybko).  "Israel Pushed Heavily for Trump to Meet with Putin" (Marshall).

The funny thing is, all of these machinations are about five years too late (as usual, we can blame everything on Barry's fecklessness).  Russia has firmly and irrevocably signed on to the Chinese/BRICS New World Order, or what we could call 'The Future'.  America is a rapidly failing mess with no future.  Putin will, of course, be diplomatic (as always) and polite, but the ship the American's are trying to board has already sailed.

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

China and the emails

"FBI: Lisa Page Dimes Out Top FBI Officials During Classified House Testimony; Bureau Bosses Covered Up Evidence China Hacked Hillary’s Top Secret Emails".  "Page confirmed China penetration of HC e-mail." (Lang).  Was Awan working for China?  This still doesn't make any sense.  Why would all these American IC guys cover up for China?  Awan got what looks like some kind of plea deal, pleading guilty to some ridiculous much lesser charge of lying on a credit application.  Will that arrangement still stand?  Or maybe Awan had nothing to do with any of this.  If so, the focus comes back to Killary's absurd supercilious negligence and wrongdoing about guarding her emails.