Monday, September 30, 2019

Worse than I had thought

"The Biden Affair in the Ukraine" (Shamir):
"The subject of the server makes many people in the Clintonite camp extremely nervous. They already marked it with “conspiracy” marker, meaning you may not touch it. In another “conspiracy debunking” item they created a straw man, saying “the notion that there is some missing “server,” and that the server might exist somewhere—like in Ukraine—has no basis in reality. The DNC’s network consisted of many servers and computers”. However, the server Trump asked about is not the DNC server, but the server allegedly used to hack DNC server. It had left some Russian-language traces, and it was presented as a proof of Russian involvement. But Alperovich’s hackers in the Ukraine also use Russian as their working language, and this allowed the Russia-hating Jew an opportunity to create the whole chain of “proofs” of Russian hackers’ activity with fancy names. Recovery of the server would put paid to the whole myth of Russian hacking, and would make the Clintonite case untenable."
Maybe, but I still think it more likely that the server Trump is referring to is the Clinton email server, which somebody has told Trump - perhaps as an excuse for not looking at it - was physically in Ukraine, whether or not that is true.

"For Dems, Ukraine Is Perfect Extension Of Russian Narrative" (Tracey).  I still find it remarkable that the crime Trump is accused of doing - the extraction of 'favors' involving personal, or political, benefit as a quid pro quo to some actual or implied removal of threat of the use of US power against the vassal state - didn't actually happen (whether through luck or because Trump is savvier than he is given credit for), but Biden did that very thing and boasted about it.  The impeachment thing looks more like an attack on Biden's chances as nominee, as the Democrat ((('donors'))) prefer Trump to any possible Democrat.  Democrats are not 'good for the Jews' or for the Zionist Empire right now, despite the kowtowing of Biden and Warren to the worst abuses of Israel, as there is an underlying Khazar skepticism rising in the party due to the sheer outrageousness of the Khazar Evildoing.

I would have said the exact opposite of this, that MbS remains as leader only so long as the King is alive and in place:  "Saudi Arabia - Another Defeat In Yemen - King's Bodyguard Killed" (Moon).  MbS's position - and life, due to the fact he has infuriated many with the kidnappings, torturing and shakedowns  - depends entirely on the respect the very conservative Royals have for the King and the hierarchy itself.

Tweet (Ben Norton) (Graham's tweets are essentially a meter on what the Mega Group has on him and the severity of the threats to release this material):
"After 8 years of a failed criminal proxy war that created ISIS, devastated Syria, and killed hundreds of thousands, neocon Lindsey Graham wants Trump to assassinate Bashar al-Assad (bombing his house like how Reagan bombed Qadhafi's, killing his daughter)"
Along with the most recent Pompeo gas lie, it appears the imminent end of the war in Syria - leaving aside the land Turkey is trying to steal - is causing the 'American' Khazar billionaires to blow a gasket, which fury is reflected in the goofy statements of their bribees/blackmailees.

"Mike Pompeo on the U.S. Victory in Afghanistan" (Leupp).

""Nasr min Allah! Nasr min Allah!" (a victory from God Almighty) Somebody show this to Trump!" (Lang). The Houthis have a sense of PR, releasing this when they think they have MbS on the ropes.

Tweet (Anya Parampil):
"Tho sadly, Iranian Foreign Minister @JZarif cannot visit his friend of 40 years, who is in a hospital a few blocks away from him, due to ABSURD restrictions the US has placed on Zarif‘s movement in NYC The US abuses it’s privilege of hosting the UN to wage war on diplomats"
Way past time to move the UN, as the Assholians can't live up to even the most basic standards of diplomacy or even decency: "It’s Past Time to Move the United Nations to Switzerland " (Madsen).

"Girls, Groupies, and Grim Reapers: The Religious Politics of Mass Response" (Forte).  He didn't need to venture into climate change denial to note that we're being had by another 'little girl' PR stunt, as the goal isn't to hide a scientific scam (denial is no longer working, and is probably backfiring as it is so ridiculous and obvious), but to prevent anything being done about it that might harm the financial interests of the 1%.

Sisi has been taking a somewhat independent foreign policy lately, and we can't have that:  "Egypt is being Targeted Again" (Kulikov).

"Freud, Sexual Abuse, and B'nai B'rith" (Guyénot) (see also:  "The Jonas Salk Polio Vaccine Lie"):
"It could easily be argued that, in matters of psychology, every sensible thing that Freud said had been said before him, and that almost everything he said that hadn’t been said before has been proven wrong.
So why did Freud become so famous? The long answer is that Freud benefitted from the same kind of communication networking that produced many other Jewish intellectual “geniuses”, and made French novelist André Gide comment in 1914 (in his diary) about “this tendency to constantly emphasize the Jew, … this predisposition to recognizing in him talent, even genius”[19] The shorter answer to the question above is: B’nai B’rith. I will not suggest that the B’nai B’rith supported Freud’s Oedipus theory because they saw its potential for the moral corruption of the West. Nor do I suggest that the B’nai B’rith and Freud conspired to ruin Western civilization with the pestilential idea of infantile sexuality. But I do suggest that, had Freud maintained his earlier conviction in the reality of the abuses suffered by his Jewish patients, he would not have received as much support.
To clarify this point, it is appropriate to recall a memorable demonstration of power by the B’nai B’rith, which has an obvious relevance to Freud’s intellectual biography. In 1913, the B’nai B’rith created the Anti-Defamation League to save the life and the reputation of Leo Frank, the wealthy young president of the Atlanta chapter of B’nai B’rith, who was convicted of the rape and murder of Mary Phagan, a thirteen-year-old girl working in his pencil factory. The evidence for Frank’s guilt was overwhelming, but tremendous financial resources were deployed for his legal defense—including false testimonies—and an intense publicity was orchestrated in the news media, with the New York Times devoting enormous coverage to the case. I quote from Ron Unz’s article:
“For almost two years, the nearly limitless funds deployed by Frank’s supporters covered the costs of thirteen separate appeals on the state and federal levels, including to the U.S. Supreme Court, while the national media was used to endlessly vilify Georgia’s system of justice in the harshest possible terms. Naturally, this soon generated a local reaction, and during this period outraged Georgians began denouncing the wealthy Jews who were spending such enormous sums to subvert the local criminal justice system. … All appeals were ultimately rejected and Frank’s execution date for the rape and murder of the young girl finally drew near. But just days before he was scheduled to leave office, Georgia’s outgoing governor commuted Frank’s sentence, provoking an enormous storm of popular protest, especially since he was the legal partner of Frank’s chief defense lawyer, an obvious conflict of interest. … A few weeks later, a group of Georgia citizens stormed Frank’s prison farm, abducting and hanging him, with Frank becoming the first and only Jew lynched in American history.”
Thanks to the mobilization of the Jewish power elite—“as one man”—, Leo Frank has been turned from a convicted pedophile and child murderer into a martyr of anti-Semitism. We don’t know what Freud thought of the case, but there is an obvious resonance between his “assault on truth” and the B’nai B’rith’s. If young Mary Phagan had visited a Freudian psychoanalyst before her atrocious death, and complained of her boss’ sexual overtures, she probably would have been told about her own “penis envy”; had she protested, she would have been told that her protest proved her sexual repression—exactly as happened to Freud’s patient Dora, Ida Bauer by her real name, an eighteen-year-old girl suffering from hysterical symptoms.[20]"
"In The Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud describes “religion”—meaning essentially Christianity—as a “universal obsessional neurosis” which has for believers the merit that “their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing a personal one.”[31] With a similar approach, Judaism can be described as a “collective sociopathy.” This does not mean that “the Jews” are sociopaths, but rather that, in proportion to the degree of their identification as Jews, they are victims of a sociopathic mindset patterned from the Tanakh, “marked in their flesh” (impressed traumatically in their subconscious) by circumcision, and fuel by their elites with the paranoia of anti-Semitism. The difference between collective sociopathy and individual sociopathy is the same as between collective neurosis and individual neurosis according to Freud: participation in a collective sociopathic mentality allows members of the community to channel sociopathic tendencies toward the outside of the community, and to maintain inside a high degree of sociability."

Tweet and responses (AlytaDeLeon):
"Elizabeth Warren says her parents had to elope because she was part Cherokee and part Delaware. This entire situation is worse than I had thought."

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Personal dispute

The classic story to explain the sudden absence of somebody after a failed coup:  "Saudi king's bodyguard shot in personal dispute, state media says".  There was shooting which was noticed, so they couldn't just say he had a heart attack.  Still, I think MbS has a long and healthy life ahead of him, up to the second that the King dies.

"[Yemeni] Armed Forces spokesman: Saudi Brigades Destroyed, Scores of Mercs Captured in Najran Offensive - TTG":  "Spin that, you miserable royal bastards!"

There's quite the Rashomon feel to the latest Clintonista-IC coup attempt - or rather the bizarre morphing of Russiagate into Enemy-of Russia-gate - against Trump, with the contrasting Clintonista accounts and the Republican/'alt' journalism accounts being so different that I wonder if they are writing about the same incidents.

Is Biden's running as a nominee just a method, akin to what you see with various forms of immunity for politicians in third-world countries, just a method of immunizing himself against criminal prosecution?:  "Trump Takes on Biden’s Corruption in Ukraine: Upside-Down World Establishment Media Attempts to Flip the Script" (Flores).

Tweet (Glenn Greenwald):
"Fascinating how people like @JohnBrennan never invoked these lofty principles about the virtues of whistleblowing for Edward Snowden or Chelsea Manning: who exposed the crimes of officials like Brennan and his friends. Only now that it's advantageous is whistleblowing heralded."
It is an interesting strategic decision of the CIA to use a 'whistleblower' to introduce the latest attempt at a coup.  Of course, with the extraordinary decrepitude of American 'journalism', they may have felt that introducing the anti-Trump material under the guise of a 'scoop' by some retypist - remember how Russiagate was almost quietly introduced by embarrassing scum like Corn and Isikoff? - wouldn't have had any credibility!

"Ready, Fire, Aim: U.S. Interests in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria" (Freeman).  Trillions of dollars, millions of deaths, yet Freeman somehow fails to notice the undeniable value of those magnificent shekel collections amongst the crooked politicians of Washington, not to mention in ineffable value of not going to jail when your pedo tendencies are revealed by the Mega Group.  These are things which can't be measured in dollars or lives, but only in the universal currency of Pure Evil, shekels.

A week's worth, for those keeping score:  "Jews, Crime and Corruption" (Semitic Controversies).

Even though I think I know a lot about them, the essential thuggishness of the Khazars, a very primitive people hiding in modern society, always surprises me:  "The Rule of the Mob: Labour Conference Banner Banned, Slashed" (Gregson).

"Note To Journos - When Pompeo Doubles Down On A Lie He Does Not "Confirm" It" (Moon).  What's the point of this lie?

Saturday, September 28, 2019


"Intel Community Quietly Scrapped Requirement For "First-Hand Knowledge" Before CIA 'Rumorblower' Relied On Hearsay" (Durden).

"Sainted Whistleblower Is Actually CIA" (Sailer):
"Huh … I’d assumed the whistleblower was a Karen Silkwood-type, a simple low-level American worker who’d stumbled upon Incriminating Information. Now he turns out instead to be CIA.
I worry that this could lead to Conspiracy Theories.
When you belong to the Intelligence Community, you never Bowl Alone.
Fortunately, the Editor of the New York Times assures us that CIA is “a nonpolitical agency.”"
It is going to take me some time to get over the fact that a significant number of Americans are taking this CIA 'whistleblower' bullshit at face value.

Just underlining the fact that this latest attack on Trump is another American IC conspiracy in a sad attempt to give CPR to the dead #Russiagate:  tweet (Nicholas Burns):
"I signed this letter with over 300 former USG officials to make one point—President Trump’s invitation to the Ukrainian President to interfere in our democracy was wrong and an abuse of Presidential power. Trump is not above the law."
"Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story".  Step back for a moment and consider how deeply weird Biden's story is - are we supposed to believe he is micromanaging Ukrainian staffing issues because he is concerned about local corruption?  You have to laugh.

The newest 'color revolutions':  "Greta Thunberg and Big-Biz' Climate Charade" (Cartalucci):
"Following the money is particularly easy in unravelling "Fridays for Future." The "movement's" own website - - under "About" contains a list of websites that make up the "movement's" network.

Each page listed contains the School Strike 4 Climate (SS4C) logo. They also contain links to various supporters and affiliates. The Canadian page - for example - has a "Promo Toolkit" page full of resources provided by corporate foundations.

One foundation in particular that turns up repeatedly is has published the "Climate Resistance Handbook" which includes a "foreword" by Greta Thunberg herself.

The handbook itself lists zero relevant concerns or actions regarding actual environmental issues and instead is a rehash of familiar CIA-honed tactics used by the US for its so-called "color revolutions" around the globe.

The handbook even cites the US overthrow of Serbia and Ukraine as examples for environmental activists to follow.

Regarding Serbia, the handbook would claim:
A group of young people in Serbia nonviolently fought their powerful, ruthless dictator in Serbia. Tey required every person who joined their movement to learn the upside-down triangle. They led trainings to explain the concept and their plan to remove the pillars they saw. 
This approach was a key ingredient to their movement. And they were successful in overthrowing the brutal Serbian dictator.
In reality, the US itself would eventually reveal no such tactics worked and instead it was the millions of dollars the US government funneled into Serbia to back a covert coup that eventually overthrew the Serbian government.

This coup was not to stop a "brutal dictator," but rather to fold Serbia, its people, and resources into America's eastward expansion toward Russian borders.

The New York Times in its article, "Who Really Brought Down Milosevic?," would admit:
Backed by extensive financing from the United States, Otpor steadily coaxed them from the inertia and introspective desperation of the 1990's, when the most decisive act of the best and the brightest was emigration or draft evasion. Through marches and mockery, physical courage and mental agility, Otpor grew into the mass underground movement that stood at the disciplined core of the hidden revolution that really changed Serbia. No other opposition force was as unsettling to the regime or as critical to its overthrow.
The New York Times would also admit details of the extent of US financing:
American assistance to Otpor and the 18 parties that ultimately ousted Milosevic is still a highly sensitive subject. But Paul B. McCarthy, an official with the Washington-based National Endowment for Democracy, is ready to divulge some details. 
The article continues:
...McCarthy says, "from August 1999 the dollars started to flow to Otpor pretty significantly." Of the almost $3 million spent by his group in Serbia since September 1998, he says, "Otpor was certainly the largest recipient." The money went into Otpor accounts outside Serbia. 
Not only were the "young people of Serbia" successful only because of dubious, secretive US funding, they were successful and their "efforts" lauded by the Western media only because their efforts ultimately served US special interests.

Serbia is no more "free" or "democratic" today than it was under Milosevic. The only real change has been efforts to draw the broken nation westward into Washington and NATO's orbit and away from its traditional ties to Russia. In essence, the youths of Serbia were drawn in as unwitting participants in expanding American hegemony, not promoting "democracy."

In many ways then - picked the perfect example to help illustrate just exactly what "Fridays for Future" is really about - a cynical public relations exercise obviously funded and directed by Western special interests using "youths" and a well-meaning agenda as cover.

Instead of specifically and explicitly targeting the worst environmental offenders on Earth - corporations like Monsanto, Bayer, DuPont, and Syngenta spraying our food and environment with poison, or Exxon, BP, and Shell for their attempts to perpetuate petrol-driven energy, or labor unions like America's United Automobile Workers which is part of a concerted effort to sabotage electric vehicle manufacturers like Telsa - "Fridays for Future" is allied with them in making ambiguous demands and giving naive youths the illusion that something is being done.

Worst still is the likelihood that this movement will actually result in much of the burden for these corporations' offenses against the environment and human health being shifted onto the public in the form of new taxes and regulations."
"SNAP! Color Revolutionaries of the World Gather for Group Photo in Berlin" (Batty).

Meanwhile, there's a whole world out there of invisible protests.  "Back to French tear gas in the morning: smells like liberté austérité" and "Why France’s 20- and 30-somethings hate the Yellow Vests" (Mazaheri).  From the first article:
"I can’t stand covering ecological protests – what a waste of time.

Firstly, climate change requires a cooperative solution on an international level, and obviously capitalism is predicated on competition at an international level. Therefore, there is no reason at all to do a damned thing about environmental issues – the only solution is to get socialism first. No socialism? Then no possible climate solution.

Secondly, is climate change a news beat which is not being covered enough already? Hardly – there are 900 billion Western journalists who simply adore covering this story. I note that the roughly 900 billion climate change articles in Western media on any given Tuesday hasn’t done much good. Don’t tell that to the eco-freaks, though – they think they’re God’s favourite servants.

Definitely don’t point out to them that the 1% just adores you wasting your political energy on climate change instead of class issues. Climate change is inherently neutered of any class aspect: billionaires and homeless alike all litter or leave a “climate impact” (or whatever) or don’t compost properly.

Climate change protests are thus so very, very useless that I cannot give a damn, and the protesters directly acknowledged this: they had one big ballon, which read “Give a f***”. Classy. And they’re the only ones who give a f***, right?

Smug punks. And climate change protesters are punks with a capital P – too many examples to list, but here’s a quick few:

The presence of alcohol at French political demonstrations is lamentable – this is not a party – but only at eco-protests do you see Champagne."
Tweet (Oh boy what a shot):
"#YellowVest (#GiletsJaunes) protests Bordeaux

 45 weeks of protests
 11 dead
 76 seriously injured
 2500 injured
 23 lost an eye
 5 lost a hand
 thousands arrested
 no mainstream media coverage

It would be a shame if this tweet went viral"
You can easily tell the fake activism/protests from the real by who gets full, laudatory (((media))) coverage, and who ends up dead, gravely injured, or in jail:  "Mother of assassinated activist Berta Cáceres speaks out against US-backed Honduran dictatorship" (Parampil).

Tweet (Tim Shorrock):
"3/78. Let's compare New York Times coverage of massive protests in South Korea in December 2016, when the 'candlelight' movement agains Park Guen Hye peaked, to coverage of the massive protests in Hong Kong in August 2019. Korea/2016: 3 stories HK/2019: 78 stories Source: Nexis."
"Banks worth $47 trillion adopt new U.N.-backed climate principles" (Rothshilds) (also).

"The ‘NYT’ gives another book review to a rightwing Zionist, who denies the Nakba" (North/Weiss). ""The Necessity of Anti-Semitism"" (Joyce).

Finally, as this vile and ridiculous SJW doxxing has to stop, and you won't get 'journalists' to stop unless they start paying a price (although he seems to have been fired for hypocrisy):  tweet (Matthew Keys):
"Reporter who unearthed man's controversial tweets he made as a teenager — only to have his own controversial tweets unearthed — has been fired" 
"Chelsea Manning, Reality Winner Excitedly Hoping Nation’s Newfound Approval Of Whistleblowers Will Get Them Out Of Jail" (Haim):
"“Americans recognize that what this anonymous whistleblower did was both courageous and patriotic, so I’m sure to be commended for releasing a report on interference in the 2016 election, right? I was ahead of my time, really. I’m not saying there will be a parade in my honor, but I sure wouldn’t be surprised. I’ll be out of here in a day or two, and then, who knows? Maybe I’ll even run for public office.”"
"The Left Press is Failing Bernie Sanders" (Studebaker).  Jacobin has an obvious ((('donor'))) problem.

For the title alone:  "Knot Racism Or Fake Noose?" (Sailer).

Tweet (DPRK News Service) (btw, I think the Conservatives erred in releasing the 'brownface' stuff too early - it has already blown over):
"Canadian president Justin Trudeau assures constituent that some of his best friends are white."
 Tweet (Hey!Let'sDoAThing!):
""When asked to contribute to Pow Wow Chow as a Native American, Elizabeth Warren accepted, and in addition to her own crabmeat omelette recipe, her white husband claimed Cherokee heritage in the book as well with his own recipe for ORIENTAL BEEF

I'm not joking.""

Friday, September 27, 2019

Coup, part deux

The very idea of a CIA 'whistleblower' is hilarious, the quintessence of some 'unclear on the concept' meme.  The Clintonistas and the IC just came up with some staging trick, a new wiggle on presenting the bizarre morphing of the attack against Trump from the utter failure of Russiagate to revival-of-coup Ukrainegate (even more bizarre when you consider how much the Uke-Nazis hate Russia, but it fits nicely with the intentional confusion promulgated by Clintonistas like Marshall, where Trump connections to Russia-hating Ukrainians is consistently presented as Trump's conspiring with Putin, reminiscent of similar neocon confusion connecting Saddam with his mortal enemy Sunni extremists, and, even more bizarre, Iran with the same groups!).  It is actually pretty lazy to use a CIA guy, given this whole sequence of attacks is just the continuing American IC attack on Trump.  If they'd worked a little harder, they could have found somebody not so obviously connected with the attempted coup plotting.

It is more than a bit rich for the CIA/Clintonistas to be relying on a 'whistleblower' prop given the way they consistently treat real whistleblowers.

"The Terrorists Among US8- Trump Whistle Blower & the ODNI FBI CIA DOD NATO-COE" (Eliason).


"New York Times Outs Individual Behind Ukraine Call Whistleblower Complaint, Sparks Outrage" (Gosztola) (also).  Actually, maybe this is a message-in-a-bottle from some patriot - I know, I know, it is hard to believe a patriot works in the JYT! - in the NYT to the American people that this whole scenario, with a hearsay CIA 'whistleblower', is very hinky.  The fact he is in the CIA is extremely relevant when you are watching an American IC attempted coup.

"Manafort Is the Key" (Marshall).  An attempt to connect the two coups.

"How Did Russiagate Begin?" (Cohen).  On the IC coup attempt, from May.

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Post Shakedown Availability

"Climate and the Money Trail" (Engdahl):
"Greta Thunberg is part of a well-connected network tied to the organization of Al Gore who is being cynically and professionally marketed and used by such agencies as the UN, the EU Commission and the financial interests behind the present climate agenda. As Canadian researcher and climate activist, Cory Morningstar, documents in an excellent series of posts, young Greta is working with a well-knit network that is tied to US climate investor and enormously wealthy climate profiteer, Al Gore, chairman of Generation Investment group. Gore’s partner, ex-Goldman Sachs official David Blood as noted earlier, is a member of the BIS-created TCFD. Greta Thunberg along with her 17-year-old US climate friend, Jamie Margolin, were both listed as “special youth advisor and trustee” of the Swedish We Don’t Have Time NGO, founded by its CEO Ingmar Rentzhog. Rentzhog is a member of Al Gore’s Climate Reality Organization Leaders, and part of the European Climate Policy Task Force. He was trained in March 2017 by Al Gore in Denver, and again in June 2018, in Berlin. Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project is a partner of We Don’t Have Time.
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), who made a huge splash in her first days in the US Congress for unveiling a “Green New Deal” to completely reorganize the US economy at a cost of perhaps $100 trillion, is also not without skilled guidance. AOC has openly admitted that she ran for Congress at the urging of a group called Justice Democrats. She told one interviewer, “I wouldn’t be running if it wasn’t for the support of Justice Democrats and Brand New Congress. Umm, in fact it was it was these organizations, it was JD and it was Brand New Congress as well, that both, that asked me to run in the first place. They’re the ones that called me a year and a half ago…” Now, as Congresswoman, AOC’s advisers include Justice Democrats co-founder, Zack Exley. Exley was an Open Society Fellow and got funds from among others the Open Society Foundations and Ford Foundation to create a predecessor to Justice Democrats to recruit select candidates for office.
The links between the world’s largest financial groups, central banks and global corporations to the current push for a radical climate strategy to abandon the fossil fuel economy in favor of a vague, unexplained Green economy, it seems, is less about genuine concern to make our planet a clean and healthy environment to live. Rather it is an agenda, intimately tied to the UN Agenda 2030 for “sustainable” economy, and to developing literally trillions of dollars in new wealth for the global banks and financial giants who constitute the real powers that be.
In February 2019 following a speech to the EU Commission in Brussels by Greta Thunberg, then-EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, after gallantly kissing Greta’s hand, appeared to be moved to real action. He told Greta and the press that the EU should spend hundreds of billions of euros combating climate change during the next 10 years. Juncker proposed that between 2021 to 2027, “every fourth euro spent within the EU budget go toward action to mitigate climate change.” What the sly Juncker did not say was that the decision had nothing to do with the young Swedish activist’s plea. It had been made in conjunction with the World Bank a full year before in September 26, 2018 at the One Planet Summit, along with the World Bank, Bloomberg Foundations, the World Economic Forum and others. Juncker had cleverly used the media attention given the young Swede to promote his climate agenda.
On October 17, 2018, days following the EU agreement at the One Planet Summit, Juncker’s EU signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Breakthrough Energy-Europe in which member corporations of Breakthrough Energy-Europe will have preferential access to any funding.
The members of Breakthrough Energy include Virgin Air’s Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Alibaba’s Jack Ma, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, HRH Prince Al-waleed bin Talal, Bridgewater Associates’ Ray Dalio; Julian Robertson of hedge fund giant, Tiger Management; David Rubenstein, founder Carlyle Group; George Soros, Chairman Soros Fund Management LLC; Masayoshi Son, founder Softbank, Japan. 
Make no mistake. When the most influential multinational corporations, the world’s largest institutional investors including BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, the UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England and other central banks of the BIS line up behind the financing of a so-called green Agenda, call it Green New Deal or what, it is time to look behind the surface of public climate activist campaigns to the actual agenda. The picture that emerges is the attempted financial reorganization of the world economy using climate, something the sun and its energy have orders of magnitude more to do with than mankind ever could—to try to convince us ordinary folk to make untold sacrifice to “save our planet.”"
Another case where there is a real problem to be solved, but the bad guys have preemptively gummed up the works.  Btw, I thought Greta's UNGA speech/rant was a PR disaster.

Tweet (Ahmed Kaballo):
 "My thoughts exactly"
This is a tremendously powerful argument if they can find an honest and competent judge who wants to go down in Canadian history as an important protector of Charter rights:  "Officials failed to execute arrest warrant for Meng Wanzhou properly: Defence" (Li) (my emphasis in red):
"Meng’s legal defence team began Wednesday by responding to the attorney general of Canada’s argument that border officials were simply following the law when they took Meng aside for questioning immediately after she stepped off a plane at Vancouver airport on Dec. 1.

Defence lawyer Scott Fenton said Canadian border security officers, like police, are peace officers and therefore were obligated to arrest Meng immediately, as the arrest warrant dictated.

This goes to the heart of one of the defence team’s main assertions: that Meng should have been arrested right away — and therefore given the constitutionally protected right to silence and right to a lawyer without delay — instead of being first questioned under what the defence alleges was the guise of an immigration check.

Meng’s lawyers say because there was a three-hour delay between her stepping off the plane and when she was arrested, during which she was questioned by Canadian border officials, this violated her charter rights.

During this disclosure hearing, the defence team’s goal is to show the judge there is an “air of reality” to their argument — in other words, that it is reasonable to think that Canadian law-enforcement officials may have violated Meng’s charter rights when they questioned and arrested her.

Meng’s team hopes this will convince the judge to order the Crown to disclose more evidence, such as emails and other communication sent between U.S. and Canadian officials ahead of the arrest. That evidence, her lawyers say, may prove meddling by U.S. authorities.

. . .

Wednesday is Day 3 out of what is expected to be an eight-day disclosure hearing that will continue into next week. Legal experts not involved in the case have said this extradition case could last as long as a decade."
"Hassan Rouhani: Refuses US nuclear talks until sanctions removed".  "In First, Iran Ready To Accept Changes To Nuclear Deal If Sanctions Lifted" (Durden).  "Video Captures Awkward Moment Macron & Johnson Plead With Rouhani To Meet With Trump" (Durden).  Sadly, the group of Israeli citizens/Mossad agents who staff the almighty Sanctions For The Jews division of the US government won't allow this to happen.

Tweet (Trita Parsi):
"EU countries who help Saudi bomb Yemen to pieces, "condemn in the strongest terms" attack on Saudi oil facilities.  #moralclarity"
Tweet (Yasha Levine):
"If this idiot didn’t gab about bombing people in America to an FBI agent online, he could have easily gone and joined Ukraine’s fascist Azov Battalion to kill Russians just like he planned. Hell, he would’ve been praised for it."
China's 'pivot' to Iran seems quite wise, if a little late:  "Saudi oil disruption could hit China hardest" (Daiss):
"The attacks on Saudi supplies have also highlighted another market trend: the emergence of US dominance in both global oil and gas markets, coincident with a decline in Saudi Arabia’s decades-long role as the world’s swing producer.
If the US had not ramped up its oil production capacity in recent years, bringing millions of extra barrels per day onto global markets, oil prices would have spiked way more than they did in the immediate aftermath of the attacks on Saudi Arabia.
As it happened, prices for global oil benchmark Bench crude jumped $12 per barrel to $69 per barrel, but then fell back to around $64, where prices have been trading for much of the US summer season.
If a similar scenario would have ensued a decade ago, before the US shale oil revolution, oil prices could have jumped by as much as 30-40% and not retreated as quickly as they did, industry analysts say.
The more moderate market response, the analysts say, can be largely attributed to US oil production dominance. In just six years, US crude oil production rose so rapidly that it surpassed that of both Russia and Saudi Arabia, increasing from 5.5 million bpd to now over 12 million bpd."
"Why The Saudis Are Lying About Their Oil Production" (Watkins)! (note also the mention of the failed Saudi attempt to collapse the US shale oil industry, an attempt that would, if successful, have also wrecked the too-big-to-fail American banking industry):
"The other measure that Saudi is taking - which it has vehemently denied but can confirm from various oil trading sources and from sources in the Iraq Oil Ministry – is looking to buy Iraq oil grades, which are close to the key export grades that Saudi ships to various destinations, including Asia. “Aramco Trading Company has been aggressively checking prices and lot sizes for Iraqi crude with various [oil] trading houses since the attacks and are looking are shorter-term potentially rolling contracts,” one trading source told last week.
“A number of the Iraqi grades are close in specifications to their Saudi counterparts, and part of this activity by Saudi to fill customer supply quotas for these grades is to make sure that the demand we are still seeing for such Iranian grades from Asia, but mainly China, is not boosted to make up for the shortfall from Saudi.,” a senior source who works closely with Iraq’s Oil Ministry told
The supreme irony, of course - as has repeatedly underlined, and as many in the oil markets now know, although apparently not the Saudis - is that a cornerstone strategy used by Iran to circumvent current U.S. sanctions against it (as was also the case in the previous period of sanctions) is to rebrand its oil into Iraqi oil, which is extremely easily done, both at the massive and porous border between the two or via various pipeline and shipping routes.
It may well be, then, that Saudi Arabia ends up boosting the bank accounts of the very people that it thinks was behind the attacks on its own oil infrastructure, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps – a staunch and active supporter of Yemen’s Houthis - through its various oil-industry associated businesses by buying Iranian oil, albeit with the stickers changed on the barrels."
"Aramco attack a defining moment in US-Saudi alliance" (Bhadrakumar) (it is a tragedy when the bullshit is flying around so much that it hits the wrong targets):
"In the circumstances, it is highly improbable that the Saudis would opt for a New York IPO for Aramco (which is billed as the mother of all IPOs.) Trump had strongly pitched for a New York IPO.

The point is, turning to the New York Stock Exchange would come with certain litigation risks that the Saudis may want to avoid at this juncture. With an eye on the rising anti-Saudi feeling in the US, the Saudis are worried that American citizens would sue Riyadh for compensation for the 9/11, 2001 attacks, leading to Aramco IPO being targeted."
 "Why Patriot Missiles Are Useless" (South Front).  Sounds like an excellent business opportunity for the usual MIC boondoggle to 'fix' the problem (American military procurement corruption lies at the root of American imperial decline - see also:  "US Navy Corruption Levels Put the Third World to Shame"; whichever sailor came up with the idea of calling it 'Post Shakedown' deserves a medal). 

This is the conspiracy theory involving the Americans turning off the defenses to allow the attack, highly unlikely as the attack itself was such a mighty and embarrassing blow to the US status as hegemon:  "The Attack on Saudi Arabia’s Oil Facility. The Patriot Air Defence System Failed. Why?" (Chossudovsky).

"Jeffrey Epstein victim’s defamation lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz will require testimony of Victoria’s Secret CEO Les Wexner" (Brown).

Duh!:  "Elizabeth Warren won’t stand up to Israel’s crimes" (Abunimah).  Tulsi's the only one without a crippling ((('donor'))) problem (though even she is shy about standing up to the Zionist atrocities).

"Democratic Donor And 'Dangerous Sexual Predator' Ed Buck Arrested After Third Man Overdoses In LA Apartment" (Durden). Third time's the charm.

Tweet (jon gabriel) (this backasswards 'confusion' underlies the entire Clintonista/Marshall attacks on Trump, involving Manafort and FBI informant Sater, and has never fit into the Russiagate template as it was supposed to):
"The same people who accused Trump of colluding with Putin for two years now claim he's colluding with Putin-haters in Ukraine. They're driving on a freeway and shifting from third gear to reverse." 
Tweet (Bryan Dean Wright) (there's a bipartisan consensus in Washington that, when your guys are in power, they are allowed to get filthy rich by exploiting that access to power, and Trump's 'impeachable offense', again, is failing to observe the niceties of allowing the Democrats to have their shot at the corruption):
"The Biden corruption story is not one invented by Trump. In fact, it was covered by the NY Times last May. And it includes a roster of not just the Biden family but Obama, Clinton & Kerry sycophants getting rich in Ukraine as well. This is horrifying."
Tweet (Jow Catron):
"Erdogan pulls a Bibi with UNGA presentation on Israeli expansion, condemns West for anti-Muslim ‘hate speech’"
"Wtf, I Love Erdogan Now!" (Anglin).  Quite something, needless to say barely mentioned in the American (((media))).

We're getting quite the outbreak of 'pilling', all at once, for those goyim who don't know how bad things really are.  "In Europe, Goyim Go to Prison for Talking Back to the Jews" (Frei).  "A Great Day for Zion" (Atzmon).  "Waterstones cancels launch for book on Labour and anti-Semitism" (Winstanley) (see also). "Kamila Shamsie’s book award withdrawn over her part in Israel boycott" (Flood).  Have your barf bag ready!:  "Among the Moderate Chic at Bari Weiss’s Book Party" (Kachka).  "UK minister vows to pressure councils and universities to adopt IHRA definition of anti-Semitism".  "Canada’s new definition of anti-Semitism is a threat to campus free speech" (Sachs).  "How a Small Group of Pro-Israel Activists Blacklisted MintPress on Wikipedia" (Webb).  "Justin Trudeau backs Israeli settlement wines" (Barrows-Friedman).  "Canadian government to appeal landmark decision on labels for West Bank settlement products" (Kawas).  "Democrats clash over bill to curb Israeli torture of children" (Abunimah) ("counterproductive to a peaceful, two-state solution"!)..

Well, son of a bitch

"Yep, these people are stone cold crooked" (Knapp).

So lemme get this straight.  Joe Biden expressly withholding loan guarantees to Ukraine in order to force them not to investigate the company enriching his son is fine, even something that Joe boasted about ("Well, son of a bitch. (Laughter.) He got fired.").  On the other hand, Trump's implied threat of withholding military aid - and you have to stretch to find the threat, as it is not express, and is only implied in the normal subservient approach of a leader of a vassal state to the President of the hegemon - unless Ukraine investigates the issue, is worthy of impeachment?  Wasn't Trump just doing his job?  Or is the fact that Joe Biden is on the other side of the partisan political spectrum mean that any wrongdoing/corruption by him and his son has to be allowed?  The entire Hunter Biden thing was mega-hinky at the time, and still is.

It is very interesting that Trump seems to think the Clinton email servers - you know, the ones that the FBI has never even tried to look at? - are physically in Ukraine, moved there presumably by the Ukrainian outfit CrowdStrike:  "Does Trump Actually Believe That 'Server' Bullshit? Yes, Ukraine Call Notes Show" (Cameron).  It is more than slightly weird that Trump is depicted as the confused victim of 'conspiracy theory' when the freaking most important point of this whole mess is that the FBI has never done its own research (I wonder if Trump is getting his information from the FBI, whose excuse for not investigating is that they can't get access to the servers which are hidden in Ukraine), and has relied entirely on the say-so of foreign nationals at a Clinton-connected 'security' firm, a firm that was itself completely embroiled in the scandal itself (remember this is the same people who waited a month after detecting alleged hacking before doing anything about it - not suspicious at all!)!

"The Bidens, Trump, Kiev and Impeachment" (Grossman) (I'm surprised to see this in the utterly degraded CounterPunch):
"Has anyone noticed how often the media, in condemning Trump’s treachery, swiftly and inconspicuously brush off the “unsubstantiated” and “vague” accusations against Hunter Biden’s and his father’s connection with Kiev as if they were of no concern, and only Trump mattered. Somehow the reports and op-eds I’ve read are simply not interested in such unimportant matters and Trump’s telephone calls make the case for impeachment unquestionably unimpeachable.
But a quick look back at the New York Times of May 1st 2019 gives food for thought, and rather undigestible food at that. We read that after getting thrown out of the Naval Reserve because of positive cocaine questions but negative results on experience with Ukrainian questions,  Biden Jr. got a job estimated at $15,000 a month with a notoriously corrupt, oligarch-led Ukrainian company interested in big fracking profits. When an overly conscientious prosecutor started investigating the case the two Bidens insisted he be fired – or else no more money from Washington. He was fired. When his successor, after obediently quashing the case, found it necessary to take it up again, son or father stepped in with new threats – which again worked.
At least that’s how it sounds in the New York Times report. And in a related interview, Bill Biden recalled how during a visit to Kiev he had threatened that he was leaving in six hours. Either the prosecutor would be fired by then or no billion. He was fired."
Tweet (Yasha Levine) (see also):
"The Ukrainian-American connection in RussiaGate and the Ukraine meddling scandal. Shout out to @MarkAmesExiled who first reported on this angle back in 2016. Naturally, a Nazi collaborator family is involved! My latest Immigrants as a Weapon letter:"

Wednesday, September 25, 2019


"Are We Approaching the End of Super Imperialism?" (Öncü).  Synthetic hegemonic currency.  You have to wonder if Trump's extreme disinclination to starting new Wars For The Jews - not to mention his series of failed attempts to get out of the current list of them - is because he has been told the US would actually have to pay for the next one, and can't come close to affording it.  Globo-homo-Rothschild-o would be sympathetic to this plight, while the 'American' Khazars, of course, want nothing less than WWIII, with the ruination of the US not the slightest concern.

The 'impeachment' probably also plays into this.  The Democrat 'donors' are associated with Globo-homo-Rothschild-o, think Sheldon is a bit too enthusiastic, and the impeachment proceedings, though doomed to fail in their nominal desired result, would accomplish two things:
  1. To defend himself, Trump would be forced to reveal the details on Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, thus forcing Biden out of the Democrat nomination race; and
  2. Trump would be perceived by the electorate as the innocent party, just trying to do his job to root out corruption, and his electoral chances would improve.
This makes sense if you think that Biden is the only nominee who can beat Trump, and you want Trump to win.  No more Wars For The Jews, but an extremely Israel-friendly Trump (with lots of
Sanctions For The Jews, and lots of 'recognizing' of Khazar thieving) , may be the consensus Khazar choice.

Tuesday, September 24, 2019

People's Holy Warriors

"Fighting Back Against the Israel Lobby" (Giraldi).  The non-revolutionary approach to the Lobby.  I don't think so.  If it was just bribes - Shlomo schlepping those big bags of shekels - this might work, but the Mega Group of gangsters has ensured Total Compliance with massive blackmail honeypot schemes, and the Congresscrooks have literally no option other than to comply unless they want total destruction of their lives, including jail time.  Phone calls and meetings with staffers won't fix this.

Comment by lysias to the recent Unz piece (the Mossad is literally running the massive Sanctions For The Jews program!):
"Sigal Mandelker, the Zionist Under Secretary of the Treasury in charge of enforcing sanctions and boycotts, was one of the high-ranking Department of Justice officials who signed off on the nonprosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Was she the one who told Acosta to back off on Epstein, as he belonged to intelligence and was above Acosta’s pay grade?"
"Making Sense of the Long-Predicted Trump ‘Pivot’ Abroad" (Marshall). Express statement that Trump's electoral 'desperation' makes him 'dangerous', i.e., he might wage peace in order to win reelection.

Tweet (Chase Madar) (tweet appears to have disappeared!):
"@John_Hudson, do you consider Jim Jones' Peoples Temple to have been a "dissident group"? "Shady cult of personality" would have been a more accurate tag, and better to translate the MEK's name into English (People's Holy Warriors), just as the WaPo does w/ other Iranian groups."
On the Listergate fabrication, and the surprising doubling down by the Yinonist 'journalists' after their loss:  "Using Forged Emails, ‘Progressive’ Journalists Smear Their Own for Challenging Syria Groupthink " (Rubinstein). Usually when this kind of thing happens the perps just slink away and pretend they didn't have anything to do with what they did.  The shekels must be flying to get such a strange self-abasing reaction.

"In Support of Brother Donald Lafleur, Executive Vice President, Canadian Labour Congress" (Larudee).  "Canadian Media Attacks Labour Leader for Syria Solidarity" (McKee).  Unions are generally pretty woke, and you can tell which ones of their 'leaders' are taking the shekels by their reaction in a situation like this.

"Stephen Harper Heads a Global Org That Helps Get Right-Wing Parties Elected. What Will It Do for Andrew Scheer?" (Harris).  "You Must Be This Conservative To Ride: The Inside Story of Postmedia’s Right Turn" (Craig).

"“A Lot of Powerful People...Could Go Down”: The Journalist Who Published Jeffrey Epstein’s Black Book and Jet Passenger Logs Comes in From the Fringe" (Pompeo).  Interview with Nick Bryant, the real journalist who tried to get the Epstein story out years ago, but was, of course, ignored by the (((media))) (except for Gawker).  The Miami (Hymietown II) Herald's reporting was part of the operation.  After all, Epstein was getting close to retirement and his Mossad gold watch, and some may have felt that the most useful pressure tactic was to hint at the real dangers of having the whole corpus of the blackmail released.  Damaging the operation, which was winding down anyway, was no longer an issue.

"No, Srebrenica Did Not ‘inspire’ Christchurch" (Parry) (my emphasis in red):
"Why did the UN peacekeepers fail to protect Srebrenica? It is an important question considering it brought the real turning point in the war. Not long after, NATO launched Operation Deliberate Force against Ratko Mladić’s forces resulting in the Bosnian Serbs capitulating to a return to negotiations in the Dayton Accord later that year. The former mayor of Srebrenica, Hakija Meholjić, claimed the town was deliberately sacrificed as part of a ‘red line’ agreement between Izetbegović and U.S. President Bill Clinton in a ‘false flag’ to prompt the NATO intervention, as shown in a 2008 Wikileaks Cable:

“Meholjic suggested that Bosniak leaders “sold” Srebrenica to the RS (and abetted genocide) when “key members of the international community started saying publicly that enclaves cannot survive.” (Note: Oric, who left Srebrenica in 1993, was not asked to defend it in 1995; ever since there have been accusations that the then Bosnian leadership deliberately allowed the enclave to fall.”
Hussain truly loses any remaining “progressive” credibility when he goes on to praise the Otpor! political organization which organized protests that led to the ouster of “dictator” Milošević (actually thrice democratically-elected) in 2000 following the three month NATO bombing campaign the previous year which left Serbia with the highest cancer rate in Europe from the use of depleted uranium ammunition, “justified” by the same lopsided argument made in the article. Otpor! was portrayed as a bona fide, grassroots movement while behind the scenes it was the recipient of millions of dollars from the US government through “soft power” NGOs and CIA-fronts like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the US Agency for International Development (USAID), and George Soros’ Open Society Institute, financed by the non-profit industrial complex or what author Arundhati Roy has called the “NGO-ization of resistance.” The success of Otpor! became the formula for Western regime change operations via indistinguishable “pro-democracy” Color Revolutions throughout Eastern Europe in the ensuing decade. Documentary filmmaker Boris Maligurski’s The Weight of Chains series is an excellent overview of the history of Yugoslavia and its first two installments are highly recommended, while the trailer for the forthcoming third film was just released.
Perhaps the reason Hussain unquestioningly heaps praise upon Otpor! is the enormous undisclosed conflict of interest on the part of The Intercept’s ownership in billionaire entrepreneur and eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, who established the site’s parent organization First Look Media. In The CIA as Organized Crime, journalist and author Douglas Valentine explains how Omidyar’s “philanthropic” investment firm co-financed with the U.S. State Department many of the NGOs in Ukraine’s Orange Revolution such as Center UA which flipped the 2004 Ukrainian election results to a pro-Western candidate. It went on to do the same funding the Euromaidan protests and subsequent coup in 2014 and both so-called Color Revolutions were modeled on the Otpor! movement . Then again, the entire premise behind First Look Media is suspect considering it made its name covering the revelations by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden while Omidyar’s eBay simultaneously owns Paypal, one of the biggest backers of NSA surveillance. What better way to commandeer dissent then to throw money at journalists?"

"The End of Israel" (Atzmon):
"Israel is rapidly becoming an Orthodox Jewish state. Israel’s Orthodox Jews are the fastest growing group in the country. They are also the country’s poorest population, 45 percent live below the poverty line in segregated communities. Ordinarily, one would expect the poor to support the left, but Israeli Torah Jews are rabid nationalists and openly lend their support to Benjamin Netanyahu and his party.
Prof. Dan Ben-David of Tel Aviv University warned recently that Israel could cease to exist in a couple of generations. He pointed to the astonishingly high birth rate among ultra Orthodox Jews and predicted that, based on current trends, they will comprise 49% of Israel’s population by 2065. The ultra Orthodox parties are destined to dominate the Knesset within a generation or less. Ben David predicts that their dependence on Israel’s welfare system will lead to a rapid decline is Israel’s economy. This is economically damaging enough and is made worse by the refusal of most rabbinical schools to incorporate standard Western subjects such as mathematics, science and English into their core curriculum. Consequently, Israel is educating a growing percentage of its population in a fashion that fails to equip them to contribute to the needs of a hi-tech society that is immersed in a conflict for survival.
The picture that comes across is peculiar. As Israel becomes increasingly Jewish and fundamentalist in its nationalist and religious ethos, it has also become more divided on everything else. The Russian immigrants find it impossible to live alongside the ultra Orthodox and vice versa. The secular enclave in Tel Aviv is committed to seeing their metropolis as an extension of NY. The Israeli Left has morphed into an LGBT hasbara unit. It has practically removed itself from the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Jewish settlers adhere to the concept of a ‘Two Jewish States Solution.’ They want to see the West Bank become a Jewish land. Orthodox Jews are barely concerned with any of these political issues. They well know that the future of the Jewish state belongs to them. All they need to do is sustain a productive secular Jewish minority to serve as their milk cow. On top of all of that we face Bibi’s survival wars that threaten to escalate any minute into a world conflict."
"Mystery surrounds arrest of a man on a cruise ship in Mykonos in investigation of a 1985 TWA hijacking that led to the torture-murder of a US Navy sailor" (Mitch Prothero) and tweet:
"it's a very confusing situation and even more confusing because Muhammed Ali Hamadi spent almost 20 years in German prison and thus should have all his fingerprint and biometric data on file in Europe. if it's not him, whoever it is should have been released by now."
"Man arrested in Greece had nothing to do with 1985 hijacking and murder, victim’s brother tells Military Times" (Altman).

"Luongo: Did Trump Just Fall Into Aramco's Trap?"(Luongo).  The Americans are just going to be human shields, with the neocons hoping for a future attack that can be blamed, again with no evidence (yet we know they must have evidence), on Iran, and thus WWIII.

Tweets (The War Nerd, citing Gary Brecher):
""Troops" is a misleading word. They won't be sending infantry but anti-missile techs, to prop up air defenses after the embarrassing failure of the anti-missile systems at Khurais and Abqaiq..."
It's bad for the hegemon brand when its 'protection' doesn't work, and on such a scale, particularly when the Russians have effective technology that is cheaper!:  "U.S. Ships More Air Defense Systems That Do Not Work To Saudi Arabia" (Moon).  An amusingly long history of the failure of Patriot missiles, which keep being bought because of the corruption of the American military procurement system, and the sway over their vassals that the Americans have.  You'd think the key take-way from this, other than the decrepitude of the Saudi Royals under the misleadership of MbS, and the whole asymmetrical warfare issue, is that the American Empire can no longer fulfill the key role of a hegemon, which is protecting its vassal states from third-party attacks.  Vassals start to get antsy and uncertain, and the whole imperial project falls apart:  "A Precision Strike on US Credibility – Shattering a US Paradigm" (Crooke).

"By Deploying Mujahadeen to Protect Mecca, Sultan Al-Trump Fulfills Key Campaign Promise" (Shmuley Ben Shekelheim).

"Beware False Flag Attacks - Opinion by Walrus.":
"The corollary to the Houthis brilliant use of do - it - yourself drones and perhaps cruise missiles, is that anyone else can do the same. This makes the possibility of false flag attacks using such weapons more likely in my opinion. Such attacks would not even necessarily require the resources of a State actor to execute, all the materials, bar perhaps the explosive, are freely available around the globe.

I will not explain the mechanics of manufacturing such weapons. Take it from me that a group of determined hobbyists could do so, provided they have sufficient security and money. Such weapons could be labeled for example “made in Iran” in such depth that it would be impossible to refute their origin, no matter how good ones forensics are.

A State actor, perhaps bent on mischief, could do this rather quickly. While this is just a guess, I would be surprised if various Western countries security services did not already have an operation underway to replicate the Houthi achievements, if only to answer the politicians question: “How did they do that??” and to start thinking about countermeasures.

My reason for being concerned enough to raise this topic is that President Trump has committed troops to Saudi Arabia and we already have other troops and assets in the region. If they were subject to attack and we took casualties, I don’t see how the President could avoid war assuming Iran was blamed."

Area 666.

Monday, September 23, 2019

Do you detect a pattern?

"Dutch court hears war crimes accusations against Israel’s Benny Gantz" (Nieuwhof).  It's so Very Israeli when part of the evidence is the boasting in the defendant's Israeli election campaign video!

"From Frontline Village of Krutaya Balka, Where Residents Under Constant Ukrainian Machine Gun Fire, Sniping, Bombing" (Bartlett).  "Town hall with Chrystia Freeland cut short by protesters".  I still find it hilarious that Freeland, wanting Trudeau's job, and just like with the SNC-Lavalin scandal, just can't bring herself to give a real endorsement of Trudeau.

Sometimes the lying is at an even more outrageous level than usual: tweet (Mark Ames):
"We’re supposed to believe that Houthis snitched on their best & only ally, Iran, because they don’t want to harm Saudi, the country that’s been slaughtering their children by the tens of thousands—so say “people familiar with the matter”."
Tweet (Tim Shorrock):
"Ed selling Signal. Who runs the Signal Foundation, where your "donations" go? That information is "coming soon." -> @Yashalevine
demystifies Signal here: Snowden is not the whole story."
This is completely consistent with Snowden being a CIA operation to take the NSA down as peg in the Washington pecking order.  Now he's directing suckers looking for privacy to give all their secrets to the CIA by using CIA-tapped communication apps.

"American Pravda: Understanding World War II" (Unz):
"To put things in plain language, during the years leading up to the Second World War, both Churchill and numerous other fellow British MPs were regularly receiving sizable financial stipends—cash bribes—from Jewish and Czech sources in exchange for promoting a policy of extreme hostility toward the German government and actually advocating war. The sums involved were quite considerable, with the Czech government alone probably making payments that amounted to tens of millions in present-day dollars to British elected officials, publishers, and journalists working to overturn the official peace policy of their existing government. A particularly notable instance occurred in early 1938 when Churchill suddenly lost all his accumulated wealth in a foolish gamble on the American stock-market, and was soon forced to put his beloved country estate up for sale to avoid personal bankruptcy, only to quickly be bailed out by a foreign Jewish millionaire intent upon promoting a war against Germany. Indeed, the early stages of Churchill’s involvement in this sordid behavior are recounted in an Irving chapter aptly entitled “The Hired Help.”
Ironically enough, German Intelligence learned of this massive bribery of British parliamentarians, and passed the information along to Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was horrified to discover the corrupt motives of his fierce political opponents, but apparently remained too much of a gentlemen to have them arrested and prosecuted. I’m no expert in the British laws of that era, but for elected officials to do the bidding of foreigners on matters of war and peace in exchange for huge secret payments seems almost a textbook example of treason to me, and I think that Churchill’s timely execution would surely have saved tens of millions of lives.
My impression is that individuals of low personal character are those most likely to sell out the interests of their own country in exchange for large sums of foreign money, and as such usually constitute the natural targets of nefarious plotters and foreign spies. Churchill certainly seems to fall into this category, with rumors of massive personal corruption swirling around him from early in his political career. Later, he supplemented his income by engaging in widespread art-forgery, a fact that Roosevelt later discovered and probably used as a point of personal leverage against him. Also quite serious was Churchill’s constant state of drunkenness, with his inebriation being so widespread as to constitute clinical alcoholism. Indeed, Irving notes that in his private conversations FDR routinely referred to Churchill as “a drunken bum.”

During the late 1930s, Churchill and his clique of similarly bought-and-paid-for political allies had endlessly attacked and denounced Chamberlain’s government for its peace policy, and he regularly made the wildest sort of unsubstantiated accusations, claiming the Germans were undertaking a huge military build-up aimed against Britain. These roiling charges were often widely echoed by a media heavily influenced by Jewish interests and did much to poison the state of German-British relations. Eventually, these accumulated pressures forced Chamberlain into the extremely unwise act of providing an unconditional guarantee of military backing to Poland’s irresponsible dictatorship. As a result, the Poles then rather arrogantly refused any border negotiations with Germany, thereby lighting the fuse which eventually led to the German invasion six months later and the subsequent British declaration of war. The British media had widely promoted Churchill as the leading pro-war political figure, and once Chamberlain was forced to create a wartime government of national unity, his leading critic was brought into it and given the naval affairs portfolio.
Following his lightening six-week defeat of Poland, Hitler unsuccessfully sought to make peace with the Allies, and the war went into abeyance. Then in early 1940, Churchill persuaded his government to try strategically outflanking the Germans by preparing a large sea-borne invasion of neutral Norway; but Hitler discovered the plan and preempted the attack, with Churchill’s severe operational mistakes leading to a surprising defeat for the vastly superior British forces. During World War I, Churchill’s Gallipoli disaster had forced his resignation from the British Cabinet, but this time the friendly media helped ensure that all the blame for the somewhat similar debacle at Narvik was foisted upon Chamberlain, so it was the latter who was forced to resign, with Churchill then replacing him as prime minister. British naval officers were appalled that the primary architect of their humiliation had become its leading political beneficiary, but reality is what the media reports, and the British public never discovered this great irony.
This incident was merely the first of the long series of Churchill’s major military failures and outright betrayals that are persuasively recounted by Irving, nearly all of which were subsequently airbrushed out of our hagiographic histories of the conflict. We should recognize that wartime leaders who spend much of their time in a state of drunken stupor are far less likely to make optimal decisions, especially if they are as extremely prone to military micro-management as was the case with Churchill.
In the spring of 1940, the Germans launched their sudden armored thrust into France via Belgium, and as the attack began to succeed, Churchill ordered the commanding British general to immediately flee with his forces to the coast and to do so without informing his French or Belgium counterparts of the huge gap he was thereby opening in the Allied front-lines, thus ensuring the encirclement and destruction of their armies. Following France’s resulting defeat and occupation, the British prime minister then ordered a sudden, surprise attack on the disarmed French fleet, completely destroying it and killing some 2,000 of his erstwhile allies; the immediate cause was his mistranslation of a single French word, but this “Pearl Harbor-type” incident continued to rankle French leaders for decades.
Hitler had always wanted friendly relations with Britain and certainly had sought to avoid the war that had been forced upon him. With France now defeated and British forces driven from the Continent, he therefore offered very magnanimous peace terms and a new German alliance to Britain. The British government had been pressured into entering the war for no logical reason and against its own national interests, so Chamberlain and half the Cabinet naturally supported commencing peace negotiations, and the German proposal probably would have received overwhelming approval both from the British public and political elites if they had ever been informed of its terms.
But despite some occasional wavering, Churchill remained absolutely adamant that the war must continue, and Irving plausibly argues that his motive was an intensely personal one. Across his long career, Churchill had had a remarkable record of repeated failure, and for him to have finally achieved his lifelong ambition of becoming prime minister only to lose a major war just weeks after reaching Number 10 Downing Street would have ensured that his permanent place in history was an extremely humiliating one. On the other hand, if he managed to continue the war, perhaps the situation might somehow later improve, especially if the Americans could be persuaded to eventually enter the conflict on the British side.
Since ending the war with Germany was in his nation’s interest but not his own, Churchill undertook ruthless means to prevent peace sentiments from growing so strong that they overwhelmed his opposition. Along with most other major countries, Britain and Germany had signed international conventions prohibiting the aerial bombardment of civilian urban targets, and although the British leader had very much hoped the Germans would attack his cities, Hitler scrupulously followed these provisions. In desperation, Churchill therefore ordered a series of large-scale bombing raids against the German capital of Berlin, doing considerable damage, and after numerous severe warnings, Hitler finally began to retaliate with similar attacks against British cities. The population saw the heavy destruction inflicted by these German bombing raids and was never informed of the British attacks that had preceded and provoked them, so public sentiment greatly hardened against making peace with the seemingly diabolical German adversary.
In his memoirs published a half-century later, Prof. Revilo P. Oliver, who had held a senior wartime role in American Military Intelligence, described this sequence of events in very bitter terms:
Great Britain, in violation of all the ethics of civilized warfare that had theretofore been respected by our race, and in treacherous violation of solemnly assumed diplomatic covenants about “open cities”, had secretly carried out intensive bombing of such open cities in Germany for the express purpose of killing enough unarmed and defenceless men and women to force the German government reluctantly to retaliate and bomb British cities and thus kill enough helpless British men, women, and children to generate among Englishmen enthusiasm for the insane war to which their government had committed them.
It is impossible to imagine a governmental act more vile and more depraved than contriving death and suffering for its own people — for the very citizens whom it was exhorting to “loyalty” — and I suspect that an act of such infamous and savage treason would have nauseated even Genghis Khan or Hulagu or Tamerlane, Oriental barbarians universally reprobated for their insane blood-lust. History, so far as I recall, does not record that they ever butchered their own women and children to facilitate lying propaganda….In 1944 members of British Military Intelligence took it for granted that after the war Marshal Sir Arthur Harris would be hanged or shot for high treason against the British people…
Churchill’s ruthless violation of the laws of war regarding urban aerial bombardment directly led to the destruction of many of Europe’s finest and most ancient cities. But perhaps influenced by his chronic drunkenness, he later sought to carry out even more horrifying war crimes and was only prevented from doing so by the dogged opposition of all his military and political subordinates.
Along with the laws prohibiting the bombing of cities, all nations had similarly agreed to ban the first use of poison gas, while stockpiling quantities for necessary retaliation. Since Germany was the world-leader in chemistry, the Nazis had produced the most lethal forms of new nerve gases, such as Tabun and Sarin, whose use might have easily resulted in major military victories on both the Eastern and Western fronts, but Hitler had scrupulously obeyed the international protocols that his nation had signed. However, late in the war during 1944 the relentless Allied bombardment of German cities led to the devastating retaliatory attacks of the V-1 flying bombs against London, and an outraged Churchill became adamant that German cities should be attacked with poison gas in counter-retaliation. If Churchill had gotten his way, many millions of British might soon have perished from German nerve gas counter-strikes. Around the same time, Churchill was also blocked in his proposal to bombard Germany with hundreds of thousands of deadly anthrax bombs, an operation that might have rendered much of Central and Western Europe uninhabitable for generations.
I found Irving’s revelations on all these matters absolutely astonishing, and was deeply grateful that Deborah Lipstadt and her army of diligent researchers had carefully investigated and seemingly confirmed the accuracy of virtually every single item."
"Roosevelt’s economic problems had led him to seek a foreign war, but it was probably the overwhelming Jewish hostility to Nazi Germany that pointed him in that particular direction. The confidential report of the Polish ambassador to the U.S. as quoted by John Wear provides a striking description of the political situation in America at the beginning of 1939:
There is a feeling now prevalent in the United States marked by growing hatred of Fascism, and above all of Chancellor Hitler and everything connected with National Socialism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews who control almost 100% [of the] radio, film, daily and periodical press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents Germany as black as possible–above all religious persecution and concentration camps are exploited–this propaganda is nevertheless extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and knows nothing of the situation in Europe.
At the present moment most Americans regard Chancellor Hitler and National Socialism as the greatest evil and greatest peril threatening the world. The situation here provides an excellent platform for public speakers of all kinds, for emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia who with a great many words and with most various calumnies incite the public. They praise American liberty which they contrast with the totalitarian states.
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a friendly manner and things are presented in such a way that it would seem that the Soviet Union were cooperating with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are completely on the side of Red Spain.
Given the heavy Jewish involvement in financing Churchill and his allies and also steering the American government and public in the direction of war against Germany, organized Jewish groups probably bore the central responsibility for provoking the world war, and this was surely recognized by most knowledgeable individuals at the time. Indeed, the Forrestal Diaries recorded the very telling statement by our ambassador in London: “Chamberlain, he says, stated that America and the Jews had forced England into the war.”

The ongoing struggle between Hitler and international Jewry had been receiving considerable public attention for years. During his political rise, Hitler had hardly concealed his intent to dislodge Germany’s tiny Jewish population from the stranglehold they had gained over German media and finance, and instead run the country in the best interests of the 99% German majority, a proposal that provoked the bitter hostility of Jews everywhere. Indeed, immediately after he came into office, a major London newspaper had carried a memorable 1933 headline announcing that the Jews of the world had declared war on Germany, and were organizing an international boycott to starve the Germans into submission.
In recent years, somewhat similar Jewish-organized efforts at international sanctions aimed at bringing recalcitrant nations to their knees have become a regular part of global politics. But these days the Jewish dominance of the U.S. political system has become so overwhelming that instead of private boycotts, such actions are directly enforced by the American government. To some extent, this had already been the case with Iraq during the 1990s, but became far more common after the turn of the new century.
Although our official government investigation concluded that the total financial cost of the 9/11 terrorist attacks had been an absolutely trivial sum, the Neocon-dominated Bush Administration nonetheless used this as an excuse to establish an important new Treasury Department position, the Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. That office soon began utilizing America’s control of the global banking system and dollar-denominated international trade to enforce financial sanctions and wage economic warfare, with these measures typically being directed against individuals, organizations, and nations considered unfriendly towards Israel, notably Iran, Hezbollah, and Syria.
Perhaps coincidentally, although Jews comprise merely 2% of the American population, all four individuals holding that very powerful post over the last 15 years since its inception—Stuart A. Levey, David S. Cohen, Adam Szubin, Sigal Mandelker—have been Jewish, with the most recent of these being an Israeli citizen. Levey, the first Under Secretary, began his work under President Bush, then continued without a break for years under President Obama, underscoring the entirely bipartisan nature of these activities.
Most foreign policy experts have certainly been aware that Jewish groups and activists played the central role in driving our country into its disastrous 2003 Iraq War, and that many of these same groups and individuals have spent the last dozen years or so working to foment a similar American attack on Iran, though as yet unsuccessfully. This seems quite reminiscent of the late 1930s political situation in Britain and America."
"Another striking historical parallel has the fierce demonization of Russian President Vladimir Putin, who provoked the great hostility of Jewish elements when he ousted the handful of Jewish Oligarchs who had seized control of Russian society under the drunken misrule of President Boris Yeltsin and totally impoverished the bulk of the population. This conflict intensified after Jewish investor William F. Browder arranged Congressional passage of the Magnitsky Act to punish Russian leaders for the legal actions they had taken against his huge financial empire in their country. Putin’s harshest Neocon critics have often condemned him as “a new Hitler” while some neutral observers have agreed that no foreign leader since the German Chancellor of the 1930s has been so fiercely vilified in the American media. Seen from a different angle, there may indeed be a close correspondence between Putin and Hitler, but not in the way usually suggested.
Knowledgeable individuals have certainly been aware of the crucial Jewish role in orchestrating our military or financial attacks against Iraq, Iran, Syria, and Russia, but it has been exceptionally rare for any prominent public figures or reputable journalists to mention these facts lest they be denounced and vilified by zealous Jewish activists and the media they dominate. For example, a couple of years ago a single suggestive Tweet by famed CIA anti-proliferation operative Valerie Plame provoked such an enormous wave of vituperation that she was forced to resign her position at a prominent non-profit. A close parallel involving a far more famous figure had occurred three generations earlier:
These facts, now firmly established by decades of scholarship, provide some necessary context to Lindbergh’s famously controversial speech at an America First rally in September 1941. At that event, he charged that three groups in particular were “pressing this country toward war[:] the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt Administration,” and thereby unleashed an enormous firestorm of media attacks and denunciations, including widespread accusations of anti-Semitism and Nazi sympathies. Given the realities of the political situation, Lindbergh’s statement constituted a perfect illustration of Michael Kinsley’s famous quip that “a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth – some obvious truth he isn’t supposed to say.” But as a consequence, Lindbergh’s once-heroic reputation suffered enormous and permanent damage, with the campaign of vilification echoing for the remaining three decades of his life, and even well beyond. Although he was not entirely purged from public life, his standing was certainly never even remotely the same."
The exact (((same people))), doing the exact same thing, over and over - history can't be that simple, can it? We've got the same control of the (((media))) now, full control of the (((Entertainment-Military-Industrial Complex))) and the message produced by it, full control of the sole permitted narrative of WWIII (Hitler bad, lots and lots of Holocaust), the deplatforming of dissenting voices on the internet (on the guise that they are 'haters'), following on the 'deplatforming' of the old and once revered historians through a systematic program of ignoring and vilifying (keeping the goy historians in line with the threat of similar shaming), and the recent revelation that the Jews are actively scouring their archives to remove documentary evidence of the Nakba, so they can scoff at future statements by historians ("where is the documentary basis for your defamation, you 'anti-Semite'"?).  Do you detect a pattern?