Saturday, March 20, 2021

I'm all for it!!!

"Twitter Deletes QAnon to Protect US from Upheaval; Russia May Delete Twitter for the Same Reason" (MacLeod).  It is difficult to imagine Twitter would be acting the way it acts if it were not being directed by Assholian intelligence agencies for Assholian government purposes.

"‘Independent’ report claiming Uyghur genocide brought to you by sham university, neocon ideologues lobbying to ‘punish’ China" (Singh).  An attempt to whitewash the fading reputation of Zenz, with lots of scoundrels, mostly led by ((())).

Tweets by Bryan MacDonald on the "rules-based international order".

"Aaugh! A Brief List Of Official Russia Claims That Proved To Be Bogus: Taibbi" (original).

"US Intel Thinks You’re Stupid: ODNI Report Blames Russia, Ignores Colombian Election Interference" (Cohen).

You have to admit it is too obvious for them to fold the Hunter Biden laptop story into Russiagate, thus simultaneously making the laptop disappear and reinforcing the Russiagate lies:  "Journalists, Illustrating How They Operate, Yesterday Spread a Significant Lie All Over Twitter" (Greenwald).

"How Do Big Media Outlets So Often "Independently Confirm" Each Other's Falsehoods?" (Greenwald):
"All of this prompted the obvious question: how could MSNBC and CBS News have both purported to “independently confirm” a CNN bombshell that was completely false? The reason this matters is because the term “independently confirm” significantly bolsters the credibility of the initial report because it makes it appear that other credible-to-some news organizations have conducted their own investigation and found more evidence that proves it is true. That is the purpose of the exercise: to bolster the credibility of the story in the minds of the public. 
But what actually happens is as deceitful as it is obvious. When a news outlet such as NBC News claims to have “independently corroborated” a report from another corporate outlet, they often do not mean that they searched for and acquired corroborating evidence for it. What they mean is much more tawdry: they called, or were called by, the same anonymous sources that fed CNN the false story in the first place, and were fed the same false story. And just as CNN did — repeated what they were told (almost certainly by Democratic Congressional members and/or their staff) without independently investigating it, because they knew any anti-Trump story would please their partisan audience — NBC News pretended they had obtained “independent confirmation” when all they had done was speak to the same sources that fed CNN."

"RE: Get ready for "Chicago Hot Dog Friday"" (WikiLeaks): 

"RE: Get ready for "Chicago Hot Dog Friday"

If we get the same "waitresses," I'm all for it!!!

Aaric S. Eisenstein

STRATFOR

SVP Publishing"


blog comments powered by Disqus